SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 número3Caracterización de polaciones microbianas presentes en la macroalga comestible Monostroma undulatum, WittrockCaracterização química parcial e bioquímica de sementes de Bauhinia forficata link índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición

versión impresa ISSN 0004-0622versión On-line ISSN 2309-5806

ALAN v.54 n.3 Caracas sep. 2004

 

Mineral content of the honey produced in Zulia state. Venezuela

Betzabé Sulbarán de Ferrer, Graciela Ojeda de Rodríguez, Jorge Peña, Janeth Martínez y María Morán

Laboratorio de Alimentos. Departamento de Química. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo, Venezuela

SUMMARY

    The mineral content of the honey produced in five zones of the Zulia state, Venezuela, during dry and rainy seasons was determined. The analyzed elements were: sodium, potassium (by emission spectroscopy), calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, manganese (by atomic absorption spectroscopy), phosphorus (phosphate ions, by colorimetric method), and ash content of raw honey samples directly collected from different beekeepers. The mean values for Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and P were 353+84; 1774+138; 237+66; 52+24; 0.76+0.43; 13.5+10.23; 0.92+0.42 and 1642+323 mg/kg respectively. The mean ash content was 0.431+0.15%. Potassium was the most abundant of the elements determined. This results confirm that Zulian honey can be considered a good source of minerals.

Key words: Honey, mineral content, Zulia state, AAS.

RESUMEN

    Contenido de minerales en las mieles producidas en el estado Zulia. Venezuela. El contenido mineral de la miel producida en cinco zonas del estado Zulia, Venezuela, durante las estaciones de sequía y de lluvia, fue determinado. Los elementos analizados en las muestras de miel cruda, recogidas directamente de varios apicultores fueron: sodio, potasio (por espectroscopía de emisión), calcio, magnesio, cobre, hierro, manganeso (por espectroscopía de absorción atómica), fósforo (iones de fosfato, determinado por colorimetría). Los valores promedios para el Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn y P fueron: 353+84; 1774+138; 237+66; 52+24; 0,76+0,43; 13,5+10,23; 0,92+0,42 y 1642+323 mg/kg respectivamente. El contenido promedio de cenizas fue de 0,431+0.15%. El contenido de potasio fue el mas abundante de los elementos determinados. Estos resultados confirman que las mieles producidas en el estado Zulia pueden ser consideradas una buena fuente de minerales.

Palabras clave: miel, contenido mineral, estado Zulia, absorción atómica.

Recibido:17-12-2003

Aceptado:21-06-2004

INTRODUCTION

    The Zulia state is a region of 63.355 km2. It is located in the north-western part of Venezuela, surrounded by the Venezuelan gulf on its north side. The total annual precipitation exceeds 501.7 mm. The average temperature is 28.50C during the year.

    The greatest part of the honey comes from the dry and wet tropical forests, where Citrullus vulgaris, Curcubita maxima, Achras sapota, Passiflora sp, Annona muricata, and Persea americana are the predominant species. Honey annual production, year 2001, in Venezuela was 296 ton. (1).

    Mineral content in honey has been widely studied in several countries Spain, Saudi Arabia, Poland and Italy (2-5). There are some profiles of components which could probably be used for the detection of the geographical origin (e.g. aroma compounds, oligosaccharides, amino acids, minerals and trace elements, etc.), as well as an indication of environmental pollution (minerals and trace elements), and the combination of methods could be an approach to prove authentic. (4, 6, 7).

    Previous research (8) has been made to establish the mineral content of honey in ten of the twenty two Venezuelan states, but the mineral content has not been studied in the Zulia state, the North-west part of the country. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine this parameter in Zulian honeys.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples

    The samples were 30 raw, strained, liquid honeys collected from different beekeepers in five zones of the Zulia state, during dry and rainy seasons, in the North-western region of Venezuela. See Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Zulia State map. North-west region of Venezuela

Ash determination

    The ash content was determined by heating 10 g of honey until sample was completely black. Foaming was prevented by adding a few drops of olive oil, and calcination was obtained at 600oC. This method is suggested in the Venezuelan regulations for honey quality (9).

Mineral analysis

    Solutions containing sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, and manganese, were obtained by dissolution of the ash in 10 ml of hydrochloric acid (0.1 N) and subsequent dilution to 100 ml with distilled water. The analyzed elements were: sodium, potassium (by emission spectroscopy), calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, manganese (by atomic absorption spectroscopy), using a Perkin Elmer 3110 equipment (Table 1). Phosphorus (phosphate ions) was determined by measuring the yellow color developed by the reaction in acid medium of phosphates with molybdate-vanadate reagent at 465 nm (AOAC, 1980). All determinations were made by triplicates.

TABLE 1

Standard operation conditions for spectroscopy analysis

Minerals

Flame

l nm

Standard, ppm

Ca

Air-acetilene

422.7

500

Mg

Air-acetilene

285.2

1000

Na

Air-acetilene

589.0

1000

K

Air-acetilene

766.5

1000

Fe

Air-acetilene

248.3

1000

Cu

Air-acetilene

324.8

1000

Mn

Air-acetilene

279.5

1000

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Data from results of the seven minerals determined in honey samples are summarized in Table 2. The variability of results for all minerals is large, reflecting the wide variation in the composition of honey samples. The ash content is near the maximum value (0.5%) established for Venezuelan standard (11), which is lower than Italian and Saudi Arabian standards (12,13). Honey normally has low ash content and this value depends on the floral type used by bees during foraging (3).

Table 2

Mineral content (mg/kg) and ash content (%) of the Zulian honeys

Minerals

Number of

samples

Mean

Range

S.D.

C.V.

Na

30

353

155-444

84

0.24

K

30

1774

379-5071

138

0.78

Ca

30

237

144-367

66

0.28

Mg

30

52

26-120

24

0.47

Cu

30

0.76

0.3-1.67

0.43

0.57

Fe

30

13.5

3,5-39.0

10.23

0.76

Mn

30

0.92

0.4-1.84

0.42

0.46

P

30

1642

1304-2274

323

0.20

Ash

30

0.431

0.352-0.643

0.15

0.46

S.D.: Standard deviation , C.V.: Coefficient of variation

    The ash content for Zulian honey was similar to the one reported for north-west Spanish honey (14), but higher than the value reported for honeys from Molise, Italy (12), Anatolia (15), Saudi Arabia (13), and south-east Spain (16).

    Mineral content in Zulian honey turned out to be, in decreasing order: K, P, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Cu, most of them are similar to that reported for central and eastern regions of Venezuela: K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Fe, and Cu (8).

    Potassium, represents 41% of the total ash content, being the most abundant mineral determined in this work; the mean content of 1774mg/kg is twelve times higher than that reported for honey from central and eastern regions of Venezuela (8). Saudi Arabian honey (13) also has potassium as the highest constituent of the ash content, although K reported value is five times lower than K in Zulian honey. Other works in honey from north-west Spain (Galicia) and from south-eastern Anatolia (14, 15) reported K values around 12% and 83%, respectively, which were lower than the value obtained in this work.

    The next most abundant mineral was phosphorus with a mean value of 1642 mg/kg, this value is lower than the minimum value reported for Saudi Arabian honey (13150 – 3080 mg/kg) (3).

    Sodium, calcium and iron content were higher than the values reported in the literature, while copper and manganese content were lower (3, 13- 16).

    Magnesium content was similar to the one reported for Saudi Arabian honey (3); it was lower than the one reported for north-west Spanish honey (14), and higher than that for Anatolian honey (15). The results obtained in this work show that the Zulian honey can be considered a good source of minerals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The authors wish to thank the Universidad del Zulia and its Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico (CONDES) for its financial support.

REFERENCES

1. Instituto de Comercio Exterior de Venezuela. Resumen Anual. Ministerio de Fomento, República Bolivariana de Venezuela. 2001; pp 224-225.        [ Links ]

2. Pérez-Arquillue C, Conchello P, Ariño A, Juan T and Herrera A. Quality evaluation of Spanish rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) honey. Food Chem. 1994; 51:207-210.        [ Links ]

3. Abu-Tarboush H, Al-Kahyani A, and El-Sarrage M. Floral type identification and quality evaluation of some honey types. Food Chem. 46. 1993; 13-17.        [ Links ]

4. Przybylowski P, and Wilcznska A. Honey as environmental marker. Food Chem. 2001;74:289-291.        [ Links ]

5. Buldini P, Cavali s, Mevoli A and Sharma J. Ion chromatographic and voltametric determination of heavy and transition metals in honey. Food Chem. 2001;73:487-495.        [ Links ]

6. González A, Gómez A, García-Villanova R, Rivas T, Ardanuy R, and Sánchez J. Geographical discrimination of honey by using mineral composition and common chemical parameters. J. Sci. Food and Agric. 2000; 80(1):157-165.        [ Links ]

7. Anklam E. A review of the analytical methods to determine the geographical and botanical origen of honey. Food Chem. 1998;63:549-562.        [ Links ]

8. Vit P, Rios A, Novoa M, Reinosa J, and Carmargo J. Antibacterial activity and mineral content of Venezuelan stingless bee honeys. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tropical Climates. Brazil. 1994; 254-258.        [ Links ]

9. COVENIN 2136-84. Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales: Miel de abejas, métodos de ensayo. Caracas. Venezuela. 1984.        [ Links ]

10. AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis (15 th edn), ed. K. Helrich. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA. USA.        [ Links ]

11. COVENIN 2191-84. Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales: Miel de abejas. Caracas. Venezuela. 1984.        [ Links ]

12. Esti M, Panfili G, MarconI E and Trivisono M. Valorization of the honeys from Molise region through physico-chemical, organoleptic and nutritional assessment. Food Chem. 1997. 58:125-128.        [ Links ]

13. Mesalam A and El-Shaarawy M Quality attributes of honey in Saudi Arabia. Food Chem. 1987; 25:1-11.        [ Links ]

14. Rodríguez-Otero J, Paseiro P, Simal J and Cepeda A. Mineral content of the honeys produced in Galicia (North – West Spain). Food Chem. 1994; 49: 169 -171.        [ Links ]

15. Yilmaz H and Yavuz O. Content of some trace metals in honey from South – eastern Anatolia. Food Chem. 1999; 65: 475 – 476.        [ Links ]

16. Martínez M, Guerra E, Mintilla J and Minils J. Physicochemical analysis of Spanish commercial Eucalyptus honeys. J Apic Res. 1993; 32(3/4):121-126.        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons