SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.73 suppl.1O6 CONSUMER DEMAND FOR ULTRA-PROCESSED VS. FRESH FOODS: WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON CANADIAN FARMERS’ REVENUES AND THE REST OF THE FOOD SYSTEM?O8 CONSTRUCCIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO DE CONSUMO DE ALIMENTOS ULTRA PROCESADOS (CAUP) PARA POBLACIÓN MEXICANA índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición

versión impresa ISSN 0004-0622versión On-line ISSN 2309-5806

Arch Latinoam Nutr vol.73  supl.1 Caracas oct. 2023  Epub 17-Dic-2024

 

Comunicaciones orales

O7 ULTRA-PROCESSED FOODS VS. ANIMAL-BASED DIETARY PATTERNS AND CARDIOVASCULAR-RELATED MORTALITY

PhD Renata Levy1 

Prof Maria Laura da Costa-Louzada2 

PhD Kiara Chang3 

Prof.  Christopher Millet3 

Phd Eszter P. Vamos3 

Prof Carlos Augusto Monteiro2 

PhD Renata Bertazzi Levy1 

1Preventive Medicine Department, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

2Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

3Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, England.


Resumen:

Introduction and Objective:

Both ultra-processed foods (UPF) and animal-based foods have been associated with cardiovascular disease in some studies. Our study aims to examine the prospective association of two dietary factors (UPF and animal-based foods), adjusted for each other, with cardiovascular-related mortality using the UK Biobank cohort.

Methods:

Participants of the UK Biobank from England, Scotland, and Wales with at least two 24-h dietary recall completed between 2009 and 2012 were included. The exposure of interest was 2 dietary factors: 1) proportion of dietary energy from UPF and 2) proportion of dietary energy from animal-based foods (red meat, poultry/fish, and eggs/ dairy). The main outcome was cardiovascular-cause mortality, identified through data linkage to mortality registries. Prospective association was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics.

Results:

Among 126,639 participants followed for a mean of 9.2 years, there were 1,327 cardiovascular deaths. In mutually adjusted models of both dietary factors (UPF and animal-based foods), the hazard ratio for the 5th compared with the 1st quintile of the proportion of dietary energy from UPF was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.76, comparing 41.5% with 9.4% dietary energy), whereas for animal-based food intake (meats, dairy, eggs) it was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.32, comparing 45.3% with 16.8% dietary energy). There was no evidence of interaction (P = 0.51). Among animalbased foods, none of the subgroups was associated with CVD mortality.

Conclusion:

Greater consumption of UPF was associated with higher cardiovascular-cause mortality in this UK population. The total of animal-based food consumption (meat, dairy, eggs) was not associated with cardiovascular mortality, neither red meat intake. These findings suggest that the proportion of UPF in the diet may be more important with respect to cardiovascular mortality than the proportion of animal-based foods. Funding Cancer Research UK and World Cancer Research Fund.

Keywords: ultra-processed foods; animal-based dietary; cardiovascular mortality

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License