SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 número4Factores que influyen en la diabetes mellitus post-trasplante en receptores de trasplante renal y el establecimiento de un modelo de predicción de riesgo.Efecto del SU5416 sobre la angiogenesis y la via ERK-VEGF/MMP-9 en la endometriosis de ratas. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Investigación Clínica

versión impresa ISSN 0535-5133versión On-line ISSN 2477-9393

Invest. clín vol.64 no.4 Maracaibo dic. 2023  Epub 22-Dic-2023

https://doi.org/10.54817/ic.v64n4a04 

Trabajos Originales

Antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus genus determined by the Etest® method: eleven years of experience at the Instituto Médico La Floresta. Caracas, Venezuela.

Susceptibilidad a los antifúngicos del género Aspergillus determinada por el método Etest®: once años de experiencia en el Instituto Médico La Floresta. Caracas, Venezuela.

Xiomara Moreno Calderón1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-6158

Carolina Macero Estévez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-7580

Débora Oliveira Oliveira1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3279-1591

1Microbiology Department. Instituto Médico La Floresta. Caracas, Venezuela.

2Microbiology Department. Bacteriology. Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Bioanálisis. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Caracas, Venezuela.


Abstract

This research aimed to determine the susceptibility of Aspergillus spp. to four antifungal agents using the Etest® method in several clinical samples (respiratory samples, soft tissue, otic tissue, and ocular tissue, among others) from a private health center in Venezuela. Thirty-three strains were evaluated: 11 Aspergillus section Flavi, eight Aspergillus section Fumigati, six Aspergillus section Nigri, four Aspergillus section Terrei, and four Aspergillus spp. A 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of a 5-day culture of each Aspergillus strain was prepared on Potato Dextrose agar and then inoculated on Sabouraud agar plates with 2% glucose. Voriconazole (VCZ), amphotericin B (AMB), caspofungin (CAS), and posaconazole (PCZ) were tested. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in μg/mL were determined after 24 and 48 hours of incubation at 35 °C and th range (R), geometric mean (GM), MIC50, and MIC90 were calculated. The results for the 33 Aspergillus spp. tested after 24 h were the following: VCZ (R = 0.031- 16; GM = 0.145; MIC50 = 0.125 and MIC90 = 0.5), AMB (R = 0.031-16; GM = 0.644; MIC50 = 0.5 and MIC90 = 8), CAS (R = 0.031-16; GM = 0.1076; MIC50 = 0.063 and MIC90 = 1), PCZ (R =0.031 - 0.5; GM = 0.0755; MIC50 = 0.063 and MIC90 = 0.25). This investigation allowed assessing the antifungal susceptibility profiles of Aspergillus spp. isolated from clinical samples by the Etest® method, which is practical, reproducible and easy to perform in microbiology laboratories.

Keywords: susceptibility; Aspergillus spp; cryptic species; antifungals; Etest diffusion method; minimal inhibitory concentration

Resumen

El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar la susceptibilidad de Aspergillus spp., a cuatro antifúngicos mediante el método de Etest®, en aislados clínicos (muestras respiratorias, partes blandas, óticas, y oculares, entre otras) provenientes de un centro de salud privado en Venezuela. Se evaluaron 33 cepas: 11 Aspergillus sección Flavi, ocho Aspergillus sección Fumigati, seis Aspergillus sección Nigri, cuatro Aspergillus sección Terrei y cuatro Aspergillus spp. Se preparó una suspensión al 0,5 MacFarland a partir de cultivos de 5 días de incubación de cada cepa de Aspergillus en agar Papa Dextrosa, que se inocularon posteriormente en placas de agar Sabouraud con glucosa al 2%. Los antifúngicos ensayados fueron: voriconazol (VCZ), anfotericina B (AMB), caspofungina (CAS) y posaconazol (PCZ). Posterior a la incubación a 35 °C, se determinó la Concentración Mínima Inhibitoria en μg/mL (CMI) para cada antifúngico a las 24 y 48 h. Se calculó el rango (R), media geométrica (MG), CMI50 y CMI90. Los resultados a las 24 h para las 33 cepas de Aspergillus fueron: VO (R = 0,031- 16; MG = 0,145; CMI50 = 0,125 y CMI90 = 0,5), AB (R = 0,031-16; MG = 0,644; MIC50 = 0,5 y MIC90 = 8), CS (R = 0,031-16; MG = 0,1076; MIC50 = 0,063 y MIC90 = 1), PO (R =0,031 - 0,5; MG = 0,0755; MIC50 = 0,063 y MIC90 = 0,25). Esta investigación permitió valorar los perfiles de susceptibilidad antifúngica en aislamientos clínicos de Aspergillus spp., mediante el método de Etest®, el cual es práctico, reproducible y fácil de realizar en los laboratorios de microbiología.

Palabras clave: susceptibilidad; Aspergillus spp.; especies crípticas; antifúngicos; método de difusión Etest; concentración mínima inhibitoria

INTRODUCTION

There has been a recent increase in epidemiological changes in filamentous fungi that cause diseases related to cryptic Aspergillus species. These species comprised 10 to 15% of Aspergillus isolates in epidemiological inquiries from Spain and the United States, particularly as the cause of invasive aspergillosis (IA) 1-3. They are referred to as “cryptic” due to being sister species whose morphological distinction is rather complex, as they exhibit different phenotypic and genotypic characteristics1.

Molecular studies have shown how the conventional identification method, based on morphological characteristics, is limited when it comes to differentiating Aspergillus species, as evidenced by the fact that such methodologies could only use one species or section (such as Fumigati, Flavi, Nidulantes, Usti, and Terrei) to identify morphologically identical species that could be separated through molecular methods 4.

The Aspergillus species most frequently isolated in a clinical context are A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, and A. terreus. The members of the Fumigati section, consisting of A. fumigatus sensu stricto and its cryptic species, are the most commonly isolated from clinical specimens and often from environmental sources. Furthermore, resistance to azoles has increased among clinical samples of the Fumigati section 5.

The prophylaxis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis are controversial due to its increasing morbidity and mortality 6. While voriconazole (VCZ) is the drug of choice, isavuconazole (ISZ) can be used against Aspergillus spp., and is considered the most effective by European guidelines 7,8. Posaconazole (PCZ) is recommended for primary antifungal prophylaxis during induction chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and salvage therapy for refractory IA 1-5. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B (AMB) and echinocandins are an alternative to azoles in aspergillosis treatment 9. However, epidemiological changes, including cryptic Aspergillus species’ resistance to azoles, are of growing concern 4.

This study evaluated the levels of azoles (VCZ, PCZ), echinocandins (CAS), and amphotericin B susceptibility in Aspergillus species found in human samples using the Etest® gradient diffusion method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Aspergillus isolates

Clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. were collected during 11 years (2011-2021) from patient samples processed in the Instituto Médico La Floresta microbiology laboratory in Caracas, Venezuela. Each clinical sample came from a different patient. The age, gender, and underlying disease of each patient were recorded. The isolates were preserved in distilled water with glycerol until the moment of the study. The different Aspergillus species’ identification was based on the criteria by De Hoog et al.10 and Klich et al. 11, assessing macro and microscopic aspects from subcultures on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA-Oxoid, USA), Mycosel Agar (Oxoid, USA), and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA-Oxoid, USA), incubated in a temperature range between 20-30 °C.

In vitro susceptibility using the gradient diffusion method Etest®

A subculture on PDA agar of each Aspergillus spp. isolates were made and incubated for five days to prepare a conidia suspension in 0.85% sterile saline solution. The conidia concentration was determined by a Neubauer counting chamber (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA) and standardized at 1 - 5 x 106 CFU/mL (Densimat™ bioMérieux, France) at 530 nm 12-14. Plates containing Müeller-Hinton Agar, 2% glucose with Methylene blue, were inoculated, streaked in three directions, and left to dry for 15 minutes. Etest® strips of each antifungal (AB bioMérieux, France); VCZ, PCZ (0.002-32 μg/mL), AMB, and caspofungin (CAS=0.016-256 μg/mL) were placed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each plate was incubated at 35 °C. MIC was measured at 24 h, with a maximum time of 48 h, in case the lecture was not possible at the stipulated time.

Criteria for interpreting the minimum inhibitory concentration

The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration at which the border of the elliptical inhibition zone intercepted the scale on the antifungal strip. To compare the MICs obtained during this study with the epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, M61 document, 2017), they were placed between two sequential dilutions taken to the subsequent higher dilution from the reference method. The values on the strip’s upper end were taken to the highest concentration allowed, while those on the lower end were left unchanged. According to de CLSI, ECVs in wild and non- wild isolates are classified based on the following MICs: VCZ: A. fumigatus=1 μg/mL; A. flavus, A. niger, and A. terrreus=2 μg/mL. PCZ: A. flavus=0.5 μg/mL; A. niger=2 μg/ mL, A. terreus=1 μg/mL. AMB: A, flavus and A. terreus=4 μg/mL; A. fumigatus, A. niger, and A. versicolor=2 μg/mL. CAS: A. flavus and A. fumigatus=0.5 μg/mL; A. niger=0.25 μg/mL, and A. terreus=0.12 μg/mL15.

Statistical analysis

A database was created in Excel® 2010. The data was analyzed through percentages and central tendency measures: ranges, geometric mean (GM), mode (Mo), and median (Mdn) for each antifungal. The MIC values that inhibited 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of the isolates were also calculated.

Quality control

American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®) control strains were used in order to evaluate the susceptibility tests: A. fumigatus ATCC® 204305, Candida krusei ATCC® 6258, and Candida parapsilosis ATCC® 22019.

RESULTS

The strains analyzed came from 33 patients, 18 female and 15 male, aged between 2-76 years and an average of 56 years. Thirty-three Aspergillus spp. isolates were identified, mostly from lower respiratory tract samples (17;51.5%), followed by isolates obtained from soft tissue (6;18.2%), ear discharge (4;12.12%), corneal ulcer scraping (2;6.06%), and one of each one from nasal septum, peritoneal fluid, bone marrow, and nail (1;3.03%). Table 1 shows Aspergillus species identified through phenotypic tests, isolation place, underlying disease, and MICs for each tested antifungal.

Table 1 Epidemiological, clinical characteristics and in vitro susceptibility to antifungal agents tested in Aspergillus spp. Isolates. 

Type of sample Aspergillus Age Gender Diagnosis

VCZ

(ug/ mL)

AMB

(ug/ mL)

CAS

(ug/ mL)

PCZ

(ug/ mL)
1 Sputum A. fumigatus 68 M Lung cancer 0.064 0.5 0.125 0.031
2 Sputum A. niger 62 F Bile duct cancer 0.031 0.063 0.015 0.031
3 Sputum A. terreus 62 M Bile duct cancer 0.031 8 0.015 0.015
4 Nasal septum A. versicolor 59 M Lung cancer 0.5 0.5 1 0.250
5 Sputum A. terreus 63 M Lung cancer 0.25 4 0.125 0.500
6 Sputum A. fumigatus 59 F COPD 0.125 0.5 0.250 0.064
7 Sputum A. fumigatus 70 F Pneumonía 0.060 0.125 0.015 0.064
8 Ear discharge canal A. flavus 45 F Otitis media 0.064 0.5 0.064 0.125
9 Sputum A. fumigatus 66 F COPD 0.250 0.064 0.015 0.064
10 Foot discharge A. terreus 69 F Breast cancer 0.125 8 0.031 0.031
11 Bronchoalveolar lavage A. fumigatus 57 F Aspergilloma ≥16 ≥16 0.064 0.5
12 Ear discharge canal A. flavus 2 M Otitis media 0.125 1 0.015 0.064
13 Jaw discharge A. fumigatus 76 F Reconstructive surgery 0.250 0.5 0.031 0.250
14 Ear discharge canal A. niger 68 M Otitis media 0.064 ≥16 0.064 0.031
15 Thigh discharge A. penicellioides 52 M Trauma 0.250 2 0.031 0.063
16 Sputum A. flavus 68 F COPD 0.250 2 ≥16 0.250
17 Sputum A. nidulans 68 F COPD 0.064 0.125 ≥16 0.031
18 Sputum A. niger 68 F Breast cancer 0.031 1 0.125 0.031
19 Corneal ulcer A. flavus 39 M Keratitis 0.125 2 0.015 0.063
20 Ear discharge canal A. niger 37 M Otitis media 0.125 1 0.063 0.031
21 Peritoneal fluid A. penicellioides 49 F Renal insufficiency 0.250 1 0.5 0.031
22 Bronchoalveolar lavage A. flavus 58 M COPD 0.25 1 0.015 0.031
23 Sputum A. flavus 57 F Colon cancer 0.015 0.250 0.015 0.063
24 Endotracheal discharge A. flavus 63 M Lung cancer 0.015 0.125 0.031 0.063
25 Bronchial discharge A. flavus 53 M Pneumonia 0.063 0.5 0.015 0.125
26 Bone marrow A. fumigatus 58 F Lymphoid leukemia 0.5 0.5 0.015 0.125
27 Finger discharge A. niger 61 F Diabetes 0.063 0.125 0.015 0.031
28 Ankle tissue A. terreus 42 F Trauma 0.250 16 0.250 0.063
29 Nail A. flavus 72 F Diabetes 0.5 1 1 0.250
30 Sputum A. flavus 68 M Lung cancer/ COVID 0.5 1 0.063 0.250
31 Leg ulcer A. flavus 81 F Colon cancer 0.250 0.015 1 0.015
32 Sputum A. fumigatus 18 M Idiopathic hepatitis 1 0.5 0.25 0.063
33 Corneal ulcer A. niger 35 M Keratitis 0.031 2 0.063 0.250

VCZ: voriconazole; AMB: amphotericin B; CAS: caspofungin; PCZ: posaconazole, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

According to the ECV of CLSI, the results showed that 97% of Aspergillus isolates tested against VCZ were categorized as wild strains, while for PCZ, all the isolates were categorized as 100% wild strains. However, for AMB, 18.2% of isolates were wild strains.

Fig. 1 (A, B, C, D) shows the graphical distribution of each Aspergillus spp. against antifungals with their respective MICs. Table 2 describes the in vitro activity according to MICs, CMI50 and CIM90.

Fig. 1 Distribution of the different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) obtained for Aspergillus spp. isolates (n=33), compared by antifungal agents tested. A) voriconazole; B) amphotericin B; C) caspofungin; and D) posaconazole. 

Table 2 Activity of antifungal agents tested by the E-Test® gradient diffusion method against Aspergillus spp. (n=33) 

Antifúngicos Range Mean Mode Median MIC50 MIC90
Voriconazole 0.015-16 0.015 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.5
Anphotericin B 0.015-16 0.1732 0.5 1 0.5 8
Caspofungin 0.015-16 0.0848 0.015 0.063 0.063 1
Posaconazole 0.015-0.5 0.0723 0.031 0.063 0.063 0.25

MIC50: minimal inhibitory concentration that inhibited the growth of 50% of the isolates; MIC90: minimal inhibitory concentration that inhibited the growth of 90% of the isolates. MIC: μg/mL.

DISCUSSION

Although it was found that the resistance of Aspergillus spp. tested in this study was low, without involving Aspergillus species with intrinsic resistance to some antifungals; it is necessary to be cautious when discussing susceptibility patterns in these species of filamentous fungi. The aim is to highlight the importance of monitoring resistance at local, national and international levels while investigating emerging resistance mechanisms 6.

Aspergillus flavus was the most frequent Aspergillus species isolated in this study, followed by A. fumigatus. This result is not comparable to that reported in the international literature, according to which A. fumigatus is the most identified species 1,4,14,16,17. Susceptibility tests showed that 94% of Aspergillus species tested against VCZ had MICs lower than 1 μg/mL compared to the ECVs reported by CLSI, where these species were categorized as wild strains. However, one of the isolates MIC showed ≥16 μg/mL, which could be attributed to the fact that the Fumigati section contains A. lentulus, which has been observed to be intrinsically resistant to VCZ 18. The molecular techniques corroborating this description were not feasible for this study. These results were similar to those reported by Castanheira et al.17, who also obtained MICs90 of 0.5 μg/mL in A. fumigatus, A. terreus, and A. niger against VCZ, as well as to those obtained by EspinellIngroff et al.12. As is the case for most azoles, VCZ acts on 14-α-sterol demethylase, and on 24-methylene dihydrolanosterol demethylase, another enzyme from the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway.

This mechanism of action could explain the effectiveness of this antifungal compared to other azoles 19. These drugs, VCZ in particular, are the first line of prophylaxis and treatment for fungal infections, although fluconazole is inactive against filamentous fungi 20.

PCZ is one of the last triazoles effective against various filamentous fungi, even Mucorales. Therefore, it has become the antifungal of choice in primary and salvage prophylaxis, especially for oncohematology patients 21. The mean of the MIC (0.063 μg/mL), the MIC50 (0.063 μg/mL), and the MIC90 (0.25 μg/mL) obtained through this research shows the excellent in vitro activity of this triazole when compared to the ECVs reported by CLSI. The most frequently obtained MICs were 0.031 μg/mL and 0.063 μg/mL, although MICs for PCZ were relatively low. These results are similar to those obtained by Build et al.22, confirming this drug’s effectiveness in the tested isolates. However, that study suggests that high doses of PCZ could be used to treat azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. isolates.

Several studies have reported about the resistance of A. fumigatus to azoles. This is probably due to cross-resistance between triazoles used in agriculture 14,17,23,24. These resistances are transmitted to humans through food and water consumption 9. Most of them are mediated by the cyp51A gene. Depending on the specific mutation, one or even all triazoles can be resistant 4. Resistance rates vary widely among medical centers worldwide, reporting high rates or rates of 1% or less 23-25. MICs varied between Aspergillus species against AMB. Fortunately, resistance to this antifungal is very rare. Even so, the MIC was above the ECV reported by the CLSI in six of the Aspergillus species isolates. Four A. terreus isolates showed MICs ≥ 4 μg/mL, while MICs of both one A. niger isolate and one A. fumigatus were ≥ 2 μg/mL.

The Fumigati section susceptibility profile is not consistent because this section contains A. lentulus and A. fumigatiaffinis, which have high MICs for azoles and AMB 26. Despite this, it should be noted that data obtained from the Fumigati section regarding MICs were two dilutions lower than those reported by Denardi et al.9 (Brazil) and Castanheira et al. 17 (global study).

Aspergillus terreus is known to be intrinsically resistant to AMB, but this depends on the cryptic species within the Terrei section 16. Despite testing a few isolates, this study’s A. terreus MICs results are comparable to those reported in the literature. Aspergillus terreus has emerged as an opportunistic pathogen, capable of causing pulmonary aspergillosis, onychomycosis, and fungal keratitis, among other diseases; it has also garnered attention due to its natural in vitro and in vivo resistance 19.

Amphotericin B is the antifungal of choice to treat severe fungal infections. Most hospitals or healthcare services commonly use it. The selective pressure in these environments could contribute to the emergence of resistant phenotypes. Resistance to AMB is most likely associated with low levels of ergosterol in the cell membrane, which reduces the effectiveness of the drug because of mutations in the Erg3 gene that inactivate 5,6 sterol desaturase, an enzyme that functions as a step in the sterol biosynthetic pathway, creating dysfunctional sterols. There are also Aspergillus species capable of producing enzymes with reducing activity, decreasing the oxidative stress of AMB in fungal metabolism 28,29.

In this study, other isolates, such as A. niger and A. nidulans, were categorized as non-wild-type or AMB-resistant strains. In any case, although other studies have reported similar results, the number of isolates tested from these species was not significant enough to obtain sufficient data to draw more informed conclusions 7-29.

Echinocandins are one of the new antifungals used for aspergillosis treatment. These molecules inhibit the synthesis of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthase, indirectly affecting β-(1,3)-d-glucan incorporation into fungal cell walls. Caspofungin is used successfully in salvage therapy against IA. During this study, 94% of Aspergillus species were resistant against CAS, and showed mean, MIC50, and MIC90 values of 0.063 μg/mL, 0.063 μg/mL, and 1 μg/mL, respectively, when compared to the ECVs reported by CLSI. The GM of the Aspergillus spp. against CAS (0.063 μg/mL) is a lower dilution than that of Denardi et al. 9 (0.078 μg/mL) regardless of the methodology used. In the treatment of aspergillosis, echinocandins are focused mainly on the wall of the apical region of the Aspergillus hyphae, ignoring the rest of the fungal structures. The activity of this group of antifungals thus affects the growth rate of the fungus but leaves other physiological aspects intact 30. Two other isolates, A. flavus and A. nidulans, showed MIC ≥ 16 μg/mL, categorizing them as non-wild. Resistance to echinocandins is not common among Aspergillus species; however, some recent reports of resistance to CAS 30,31 are consistent with our findings.

These cryptic species are significant mainly because they can display intrinsic resistance with an in vitro rate of around 40% against at least one antifungal 6,13. The resistance rate against azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins varies by region, hence the importance of getting global epidemiological data. Furthermore, MICs from environmental and clinical samples of azole-resistant Aspergillus species should be compared to understand this antifungal resistance phenomenon. In order to determine a precise ECV that could improve the use of clinical cut-off points for Aspergillus species, it seems imperative to obtain both more epidemiological and more semiotic data (clinical and molecular), which includes the treatment of IA caused by resistant strains to different antifungal drugs 1,17,23.

We ratify the need to identify the different species in each section using molecular techniques and include susceptibility tests. In this study, the Etest® agar strip diffusion method proved to help obtain ECV-guided MICs established by CLSI. These MICs provided clinical guidelines for treating infections caused by Aspergillus species isolated in Venezuela.

REFERENCES

1. Cho S-Y, Lee D-G, Kim W-B, Chun H-S, Park C, Myong J-P, Park Y-J, Choi JK, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Park SH, Choi SM, Choi HJ, Yoo JH. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility profile of Aspergillus species: comparison between environmental and clinical isolates from patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57: e02023 18. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.02023-18. [ Links ]

2. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Mellado E, Peláez T, Pemán J, Zapico S, Alvarez M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M, FILPOP Study Group. Population- based survey of filamentous fungi and antifungal resistance in Spain (FILPOP Study). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57(7):3380-3387. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.00383-13. [ Links ]

3. Balajee SA, Kano R, Baddley JW, Moser SA, Marr KA, Alexander BD, Andes D, Kontoyiannes DP, Perrone G, Peterson S, Brandt ME, Pappas PG, Chiller T. Molecular identification of Aspergillus species collected for the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47:3138-3141. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.01070-09. [ Links ]

4. Sabino R, Gonçalves P, Melo A, Simões D, Oliveira M, Francisco M, Viegas C, Carvalho D, Martins C, Ferreira T, Toscano C, Simões H, Veríssimo C. Trends on Aspergillus epidemiology-Perspectives from a National Reference Laboratory Surveillance Program. J Fungi 2021; 7, 28. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jof7010028. [ Links ]

5. Snelders E, Van Der Lee HAL, Kuijpers J, Rijs AJ M.M, Varga J, Samson RA, Mellado E, Donders ART, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLOS Medicine 2008; 5(11): 1629-1637. [e219]. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050219. [ Links ]

6. Cantón E, Córdoba S, Melhem M, Pemán J, Rivas P. Estudio de la sensibilidad a los antifúngicos en los pacientes con Enfermedad Fúngica Invasora. En: Aproximación Clínica Diagnóstica de la Enfermedad Fúngica Invasora. Capítulo 7. Micellium 2017. [ Links ]

7. Bassetti M, Bouza E. Invasive mould infections in the ICU setting: complexities and solutions. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72(1): i39-i47. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jac/dkx032. [ Links ]

8. Cornely OA, Hoenigl M, Lass-Flörl C, Chen SC, Kontoyiannis DP, Morrissey CO, Thompson III GR, for the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSG -ERC) and the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Defining breakthrough invasive fungal infection-Position paper of the mycoses study group education and research consortium and the European Confederation of Medical Mycology. Mycoses 2019;62(9):716-729. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/myc.12960. [ Links ]

9. Bedin Denardi L, Hoch Dalla-Lana B, Pantella Kunz de Jesus F, Bittencourt Severo C, Morais Santurio J, Zanette RA, Alves SH. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus in Brazil. The Braz J Infect Dis 2018; 22(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.10.005. [ Links ]

10. De Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ. Atlas of Clinical Fungi. Segunda edición. Central bureau voor Schimmel cultures, Utrecht: Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus; 2000. p. 442-519. [ Links ]

11. Klich MA, Pitt JI. A laboratory guide to the common Aspergillus species and their 19 teleomorphs. Canberra: CSIRO - Division of Food Processing. 2da. Edition. 1998. p. 116. [ Links ]

12. Espinel-Ingroff A, Rezusta A. E-test method for testing susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. to the new triazoles voriconazole and posaconazole and to established antifungal agents: comparison with NCCLS broth microdilution method. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40(6):2101-2107. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2101-2107.2002. [ Links ]

13. Guinea J, Peláez T, Alcalá L, Bouza E. Correlation between the E-Test and the CLSI M38-A microdilution method to determine the activity of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and itraconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagn Micr Infec Dis 2007; 57:273-276. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.09.003. [ Links ]

14. Imbert S, Normand AC, Ranque S, Costa JM, Guitard J, Accoceberry I, Bonnal C, Fekkar A, Bourgeois N, Houzé S, Hennequin C, Piarroux R, Dannaoui E, Botterel F. Species identification and in vitro antifunagal susceptibility of Aspergillus terreus species complex clinical isolates from a French Multicenter Study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: e02315-02317. https//doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.02315-17. [ Links ]

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamnetous Fungi, Approved Guideline. CLSI document M61. Wayne, PA; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [ Links ]

16. Guinea J. Updated EUCAST clinical breakpoints against Aspergillus, implications for the clinical. J Fungi 2020; 6: 343. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jof6040343. [ Links ]

17. Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Davis AP, Rhomberg PR, Pfaller MA. Monitoring antifungal resistance in a global collection of invasive yeasts and molds: application of CLSI epidemiological cut-off values and whole-genome sequencing analysis for detection of azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 22;61(10): e00906-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.00906-17. [ Links ]

18. Balajee SA, Gribskov JL, Hanley E, Nickle D, Marr KA. Aspergillus lentulus sp. nov., a new sibling species of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:625-632. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/EC.4.3.625-632.2005. [ Links ]

19. Pérez-Cantero A, López-Fernández L, Guarro J, Capilla J. Azole resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus: update and recent advances. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;55(1):105807. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.011. [ Links ]

20. Ruiz-Camps I, Cuenca-Estrella M. Antifúngicos para uso sistémico. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2009; 27(6):353-362. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eimc.2009.04.001. [ Links ]

21. Cornely OA, Mertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Wals TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiecki J, Stockelberg D, Goh YT, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 348-359. https://doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJMoa061094. [ Links ]

22. Buil JB, Hagen F, Chowdhary A, Verweij PE, Meis JF. Itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole CLSI MIC distributions for wild-type and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Fungi (Basel, Switzerland). 2018; 4(3): e103. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jof4030103. [ Links ]

23. Fuhren J, Voskuil WS, Boel CH, Haas PJA, Hagen F, Meis JF, Kusters JG. High prevalence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from high-risk patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70:2894-2898. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jac/dkv177. [ Links ]

24. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, Rice C, Tendolkar S, Hollis R, Diekema DJ. In vitro survey of triazole cross-resistance among more than 700 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:2568-2572. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/JCM.00535-08. [ Links ]

25. Pham CD, Reiss E, Hagen F, Meis JF, Lockhart SR. Passive surveillance for azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, United States, 2011-2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2014; 20:1498-1503. https://doi.org/ 10.3201/eid2009.140142. [ Links ]

26. Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Aspergillus Section Fumigati: antifungal susceptibility patterns and sequence-based identification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52(4):1244-1251. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/AAC.00942-07. [ Links ]

27. San Juan JL, Fernández CM, Almaguer M, Perurena MR, Martínez GF, Velar RE, IIInait MT. Sensibilidad in vitro de cepas cubanas de Aspergillus spp. de origen clínico y ambiental. Biomédica 2017; 37:452-459. https://doi.org/ 10.7705/biomedica.v34i2.3447. [ Links ]

28. Cavassin FB, Bau´-Carneiro JL, Vilas-Boas RR, Queiroz-Telles F. Sixty years of amphotericin B: an overview of the main antifungal agent used to treat invasive fungal infections. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10(1):115-147. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40121-020-00382-7. [ Links ]

29. Seo K, Akiyoshi H, Ohnishi Y. Alteration of cell wall composition leads to amphotericin B resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Microbiol Immunol 1999; 43:1017-1025. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1999.tb01231.x. [ Links ]

30. Mayr A, Aigner M, Lass-Flörl C. Caspofungin: ¿When and how? The microbiologist’s view. Mycoses 2011; 55:27-35. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02039.x. [ Links ]

31. Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. Wild-type minimum effective concentration distributions and epidemiologic cut-off values for caspofungin and Aspergillus spp. as determined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 67(1):56-60. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.01.001. [ Links ]

Funding The Instituto Médico La Floresta Microbiology Department entirely financed the study.

Authors Contribution

3XM study conceptualization and design; research; analysis and interpretation of results; preparation, writing, review and editing of the final manuscript. CM and DO research; analysis, interpretation of results and final manuscript editing.

Received: January 15, 2023; Accepted: May 18, 2023

Corresponding author: Xiomara Moreno Calderón. Microbiology Department, Bacteriology Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Bioanálisis. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto Médico La Floresta. Caracas, Venezuela. Tel.: +584143722227. Email: xmorenoc1356@gmail.com

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License