<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0004-0622</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[ALAN]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0004-0622</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0004-06222016000100008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of extracts from potato and tomato wastes as natural antioxidant additives]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robles-Ramírez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María del Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monterrubio-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mora-Escobedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rosalva]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beltrán-Orozco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María del Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Politécnico Nacional Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[México ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>66</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>066</fpage>
<lpage>073</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0004-06222016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0004-06222016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0004-06222016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The industrialization of potato and tomato produces large amount of wastes. Previous studies have demonstrated that these by-products are rich in antioxidant compounds. In this study, the composition and antioxidant efficacy of extracts from potato and tomato by-products were determined in order to evaluate their potential as food additives. Potato and tomato wastes showed to be good sources of fiber, protein and antioxidants. The antioxidant activity and total phenolic, carotenoid and lycopene contents were determined in methanol, ethanol and acetone extracts of the residues. Methanol was the best solvent for the extraction of phenolics while acetone was the best in the extraction of carotenoids in both residues. The greatest antioxidant activity (14.10 &#956;mol Trolox/g) resulted when potato peels were extracted with ethanol. The oxidative stability of canola oil containing either ethanol extracts of potato and tomato wastes (200 and 400 mg/kg) or the synthetic antioxidant BHT (200 mg/kg), compared to oil without antioxidants, was evaluated by measuring their peroxide values, conjugated dienes and p-anisidine value after 72 and 144 h storage at 65 °C. The order of antioxidant efficacy was as follows: potato peels > BHT > tomato residues. The results showed that ethanol extracts of potato and tomato waste could be used as natural antioxidant additives in the protection of vegetable oils.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Evaluación de extractos obtenidos a partir de desperdicios de papa y jitomate, como aditivos antioxidantes naturales. La industrialización de la papa y el jitomate genera grandes cantidades de desechos. Estudios previos han demostrado que estos subproductos son ricos en compuestos antioxidantes. En este trabajo se determinaron la composición y la eficacia antioxidante de subproductos de papa y jitomate con el fin de evaluar su potencial como aditivos alimentarios. Los desechos de papa y jitomate demostraron ser buenas fuentes de fibra, proteína y antioxidantes. Se determinó la actividad antioxidante y el contenido de compuestos fenólicos, carotenoides y licopeno en extractos metanólicos, etanólicos y acetónicos de los residuos. El mejor disolvente para la extracción de compuestos fenólicos fue el metanol mientras que la acetona fue el mejor disolvente para extraer los carotenoides. La mayor actividad antioxidante (14.10 &#956;mol Trolox/g) se obtuvo cuando las cáscaras de papa se extrajeron con etanol. La estabilidad oxidativa de aceite de canola adicionado con los extractos etanólicos de desechos de papa o jitomate (200 y 400 mg/kg) o con el antioxidante sintético BHT (200 mg/kg), comparándolos con aceite sin antioxidantes, se evaluó mediante la medición de su índice de peróxidos, dienos conjugados e índice de anisidina, después de almacenarlo a 65°C durante 72 y 144 h. El orden de eficacia antioxidante fue como sigue: cáscara de papa > BHT > residuos de jitomate. Los resultados demostraron que los extractos etanólicos de los desperdicios de papa y jitomate podrían ser usados como aditivos antioxidantes naturales en la protección de aceites vegetales.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Tomato by-products]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[potato peels]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[total phenolics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[total carotenoids]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[lycopene]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[antioxidant additives]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Subproductos de jitomate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cáscaras de papa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fenólicos totales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[carotenoides totales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[licopeno]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aditivo antioxidante]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><font face="Verdana"><b>Evaluation of extracts from potato and tomato wastes  as natural antioxidant additives.</b></font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana">  <font size="2">María del Carmen Robles-Ramírez, Ricardo Monterrubio-López,  Rosalva Mora-Escobedo, María del Carmen Beltrán-Orozco.</font></font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México,  D.F. México.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>SUMMARY: </b>The industrialization of potato and tomato  produces large amount of wastes. Previous studies have  demonstrated that these by-products are rich in antioxidant  compounds. In this study, the composition and antioxidant  efficacy of extracts from potato and tomato by-products  were determined in order to evaluate their potential as food  additives. Potato and tomato wastes showed to be good  sources of fiber, protein and antioxidants. The antioxidant  activity and total phenolic, carotenoid and lycopene contents  were determined in methanol, ethanol and acetone extracts of  the residues. Methanol was the best solvent for the extraction  of phenolics while acetone was the best in the extraction  of carotenoids in both residues. The greatest antioxidant  activity (14.10 &#956;mol Trolox/g) resulted when potato peels  were extracted with ethanol. The oxidative stability of canola  oil containing either ethanol extracts of potato and tomato  wastes (200 and 400 mg/kg) or the synthetic antioxidant  BHT (200 mg/kg), compared to oil without antioxidants, was  evaluated by measuring their peroxide values, conjugated  dienes and p-anisidine value after 72 and 144 h storage at  65 °C. The order of antioxidant efficacy was as follows:  potato peels &gt; BHT &gt; tomato residues. The results showed  that ethanol extracts of potato and tomato waste could be  used as natural antioxidant additives in the protection of  vegetable oils.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>Key words: </b>Tomato by-products, potato peels, total phenolics,  total carotenoids, lycopene, antioxidant additives.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  RESUMEN: </b>Evaluación de extractos obtenidos a partir  de desperdicios de papa y jitomate, como aditivos antioxidantes  naturales. La industrialización de la papa y el  jitomate genera grandes cantidades de desechos. Estudios  previos han demostrado que estos subproductos son ricos en  compuestos antioxidantes. En este trabajo se determinaron  la composición y la eficacia antioxidante de subproductos de  papa y jitomate con el fin de evaluar su potencial como aditivos  alimentarios. Los desechos de papa y jitomate demostraron  ser buenas fuentes de fibra, proteína y antioxidantes. Se  determinó la actividad antioxidante y el contenido de compuestos  fenólicos, carotenoides y licopeno en extractos metanólicos,  etanólicos y acetónicos de los residuos. El mejor  disolvente para la extracción de compuestos fenólicos fue el  metanol mientras que la acetona fue el mejor disolvente para  extraer los carotenoides. La mayor actividad antioxidante  (14.10 &#956;mol Trolox/g) se obtuvo cuando las cáscaras de papa  se extrajeron con etanol. La estabilidad oxidativa de aceite de  canola adicionado con los extractos etanólicos de desechos  de papa o jitomate (200 y 400 mg/kg) o con el antioxidante  sintético BHT (200 mg/kg), comparándolos con aceite sin  antioxidantes, se evaluó mediante la medición de su índice  de peróxidos, dienos conjugados e índice de anisidina, después  de almacenarlo a 65°C durante 72 y 144 h. El orden de  eficacia antioxidante fue como sigue: cáscara de papa &gt; BHT  &gt; residuos de jitomate. Los resultados demostraron que los  extractos etanólicos de los desperdicios de papa y jitomate  podrían ser usados como aditivos antioxidantes naturales en  la protección de aceites vegetales.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>Palabras clave: </b>Subproductos de jitomate, cáscaras de papa,  fenólicos totales, carotenoides totales, licopeno, aditivo antioxidante.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>INTRODUCTION</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Lipids can undergo a series of chemical reactions  such as autoxidation, thermolysis and polymerization  when they are exposed to heat, light, oxygen and  other oxidizing agents (1). This results in the decrease  of the nutritional value of food as well as changes  in colour, texture and other sensory and physiological  properties. Lipid peroxidation resulting from the  reaction between the unsaturated fatty acids and molecular  oxygen is a severe problem for the fat and oil  industry. It not only deteriorates the quality of fat and  fatty foods causing chemical damage, but also produces  free radicals and reactive oxygen species that are  associated with carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, inflammation,  aging and cardiovascular disease. Because of  this, the consumers do not accept oxidized products  and, as a consequence, the food industries suffer economic  losses (2).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Synthetic antioxidants, such as BHT (butylated  hydroxytoluene), BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole)  and TBHQ (tertiary butyl hydroquinone) have been  widely used for the preservation and protection of  high-fat products against oxidation. However, some  studies indicate that these compounds may be involved  in many health risks, including hepatic damage  and cancer (3). Therefore, research has been focused  on the study of naturally occurring antioxidants, such  as those from agricultural by-products, as sources of  food additives (4-8). The efficiency of methanolic  extracts of wastes from pomegranate, apple, banana,  citrus, corn, wheat, and rice for improving the oxidative  stability of corn oil has been proven (5). The  methanolic extracts of peels from tomato, cucumber,  and watermelon also had antioxidant activity against  sunflower oil oxidation (8) while extracts of potato  peels and sugar beet pulp were effective in stabilizing  sunflower and soybean oils (2).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Tomatoes and potatoes are two crops widely  grown in the world. In 2013 the world production of  tomatoes and potatoes was approximately 163 and  374 million tons, respectively (9). The industrialization  of these vegetables produces large amounts of  waste (20-50 kg/ton and 100-120 kg/ton of the initial  weight of tomatoes and potatoes, respectively) that  could be used in the production of antioxidants (10-  11). Dry tomato by-products (seeds and peels) have a  high content of carotenoids (approximately 950 mg/  kg), mainly lycopene, lutein and &#946;-carotene (11), as  well as the phenolic compounds quercetin and kaempherol  (8). On the other hand, chlorogenic, caffeic,  protocatechuic, hydroxybenzoic, p-coumaric, ferulic,  and gallic acids have been identified in potato peels  (8,12). The high antioxidant activity of all of these  compounds has been demonstrated in different studies.  Phenolic compounds have an ideal structure for  scavenging free radicals because they have phenolic  hydroxyl groups that are prone to donate a hydrogen  atom or an electrone to a free radical and have a conjugated  aromatic system to delocalize the impaired  electrone (1). On the other hand, carotenoids can interact  with free radicals and have the ability to quench  singlet oxygen due to their conjugated double bond  system (8).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The objectives of this study were to determine the  total phenolic compounds, carotenoids and antioxidant  activity of extracts from potato and tomato wastes  obtained with different solvents, and to evaluate its  effectiveness in preventing the oxidation of canola oil.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  MATERIALS AND METHODS</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>Reagents</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  ABTS (2,2&#8242;-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-  6-sulfonic acid)|, potasium persulfate, trolox (6-hydroxy-  2, 5, 7, 8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic  acid), gallic acid, BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene),  and p-anisidine, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich  (St. Louis, MO).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>Materials</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Alpha)  and tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Saladette)  were obtained from a local retail market of  Mexico City. Both vegetables (20 kg each) were of a  maturity state similar to that used for the industry and  without any physical damage. Potatoes were washed  and peeled with a mechanical peeler, whereas tomatoes  were previously fractionated and heated at 90°C  for 60 sec (hot break) and then sieved to obtain the  by-products (peels and seeds). Both residues were  then dried in a convection oven at 45°C, ground and  sieved trough a 0.5 mm standard mesh. Canola refined  oil without antioxidants were obtained from a local  refinery of Mexico.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Proximate analysis of potato and tomato residues  Moisture, crude protein, crude fat, ash, and crude  fiber were determined according to the methods of  AOAC (13), whereas carbohydrates were calculated  by difference.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Extraction of antioxidant compounds</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Ground materials (10 g) were extracted in a shaker  with 100 mL of 80% ethanol at room temperature  overnight. Afterward, the extract was recovered by  centrifugation at 6182 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the residue  was re-extracted under the same conditions. The  combined extracts were evaporated in a rotary evaporator  at 40 °C. Dry extracts were weighed and stored  at -20°C in the dark for further use in the oxidative  stability determination. The antioxidant compounds  were extracted with different solvents (80% ethanol,  80% methanol, and acetone) in order to select the best  solvent to give the highest yield of antioxidants. For  the determination of phenolic compounds, carotenoids,  lycopene, and antioxidant activity, extracts were  used without evaporation.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Total phenolics determination</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Total phenolic content was determined using the  modified Folin-Ciocalteu method (14). A 0.5 mL aliquot  of extract solution was mixed with 4.5 mL of  distilled water and 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent,  and allowed to react at room temperature for 3 min.  Then, 1 mL of 1N sodium carbonate was added, and  the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1  h. The absorbance was measured at 725 nm. Gallic  acid was used as standard and total phenolic content  was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents  (GAE) per 100 g dry weight (DW) sample.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Total carotenoids and lycopene determination</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Carotenoids and lycopene contents were determined  according to the methods of Scott (15), and Fish  et al. (16), respectively, with slight modifications. In  brief, 10 mL of sample extract was added to 10 mL  of hexane into an assay tube previously wrapped in  aluminum foil. The tube was introduced in an ice bath  and stirred in an orbital shaker at 180 rpm for 15 min.  Then, 3 mL of deionized water was added to each tube,  and the samples were shaken for 5 min more. Shaking  was stopped, and tubes were left at room temperature  until phase separation. The absorbance of the hexane  layer (A) was measured at 450 nm for total carotenoids  determination, and at 503 nm for lycopene content,  using a blank of hexane. The total carotenoid (TC)  concentration was calculated as follows: TC (mg/kg)  = (A x V x 104) / (A1% x m); where A is the absorbance  at 450 nm, V is the hexane volume, A1% is the  extinction coefficient for total carotenoids (2500), and  m is the weight of the sample in the extract. The lycopene  content was estimated by the relation: Lycopene  (mg/kg) = A x 31.2 / m; where A is the absorbance at  503 nm, and m is the weight of the sample in 10 mL  of solvent.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  ABTS radical-scavenging activity</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The ABTS radical-scavenging activity was determined  according to the method of Re et al. (17). The  ABTS•+ stock solution was prepared by mixing 7 mM  of ABTS with 2.45 mM of potassium persulfate (final  concentration), and allowed to react at room temperature  in the dark for 12-16 h. The stock solution was  diluted with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02  at 734 nm. Extracts, synthetic antioxidant (BHT) or  Trolox standard solutions (20 &#956;L) were allowed to  react with 1980 &#956;L of ABTS•+ for 7 min, and then the  absorbance was measured at 734 nm. Ethanol (80%)  was used as a blank. The antioxidant activity was expressed  as &#956;mol of Trolox equivalents (TE) per gram  of dry weight.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Oxidative stability determination</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The Schaal method was used to evaluate the effect  of the extracts against canola oil oxidation (2,18).  The extracts of potato peels and tomato residues were  applied to refined canola oil (free of antioxidants) at  different concentrations (200 and 400 mg/kg of dry  extract). BHT at a level of 200 mg/kg was also applied  for comparison. An oil sample, without antioxidant,  was used as a control. Glass jars (50 mL, wide mouth,  with screw caps) were filled with 30 mL of the test  samples and were capped. The jars were subjected to  accelerated oxidative storage in an oven at 65°C for  144 h. Peroxide value, conjugated dienes, and anisidine  value were evaluated in triplicate at zero time, 72  and 144 h.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Determination of the canola oil oxidation</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The peroxide value (PV) was determined iodometrically  following the AOAC official method (13).  To measure the conjugated dienes, the specific extinction  at 232 nm was determined using a spectrophotometer.  Previously, the oil samples were diluted  with iso-octane to bring the absorbance within limits  (0.2-0.8).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The p-anisidine value (AV) was determined according  to Cd 18-90 method of AOCS (19). Briefly, 0.2  g of oil samples were dissolved in 25 mL iso-octane  and absorbance of this solution was measured at 350  nm using a spectrophotometer. Five milliliters of the  above mixture was mixed with 1 mL of 0.25% p-anisidine  in acetic acid (w/v) for 10 min, and absorbance  was read at 350 nm. Anisidine value was calculated  according to the equation: </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  AV = 25 x (1.2As – Ab)/ m;  where As is the absorbance of the fat solution after  reaction with the p-anisidine reagent, Ab is the absorbance  of the fat solution, and m is the mass of the oil  sample (g).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Statistical analysis</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  All analyses were performed in triplicate. The results  were expressed as the mean ± standard devia  tion, and significance was determined by ANOVA  and Tukey post-hoc test using Microsoft Excel 2007  and the methods described by Montgomery (20). Differences  were considered statistically significant if  p &lt;0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was also  calculated using Excel.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>RESULTS</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>  Proximate composition of potato and tomato  residues</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Table 1 shows the proximate composition of tomato  and potato by-products. Both wastes had high  protein and fiber contents. However, tomato waste had  higher fiber and fat amounts and lower ash and carbohydrate  contents than potato peels (p&#706;0.05), whereas  there was no difference in the protein content of both  residues (p&gt;0.05).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Total phenolics, carotenoids and antioxidant  activity in tomato and potato extracts</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Table 2 shows the contents of total phenolic  compounds, carotenoids and lycopene as well as the  antioxidant activity of the samples. The amount of  phenolic compounds varied in the different extracts,  ranging from 11.46 to 79.20 mg GAE/100 g DW for  potato peels, and from 3.23 to 43.43 mg GAE/100  g DW for tomato residues depending on the solvent  used to extract them. The results indicated that ethanol  and methanol were better than the acetone (p&#706;0.05) to  extract phenolic compounds from these kind of materials.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  In the case of total carotenoid and lycopene content,  acetone was better solvent than methanol and  ethanol to extract these components. Total carotenoids  were in the range of 2.24 to 3.77 mg/kg for potato  peels, and 13.39 to 294.59 mg/kg for tomato wastes,  whereas lycopene varied from 0.65 to 0.96 mg/kg for  potato peels, and from 3.4 to 101.7 mg/kg for tomato  wastes, depending on the solvent used in the extraction.  The extracts obtained from potato peels showed  to be more efficient ABTS radical scavengers (14.13,  14.10, and 1.63 &#956;mol trolox/g) than extracts obtained  from tomato waste (5.19, 4.77, and 7.21 &#956;mol  trolox/g), using methanol, ethanol and acetone.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Methanol and ethanol were better solvents to extract  antioxidants from potato peels than acetone while acetone  was better for tomato by-products. It is worth noting  that there was no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) between the ABTS activity  of the methanol extracts  and the activity of  ethanol extracts in both  wastes.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  </font><a name="t1"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v66n1/art08.1.jpg" width="394" height="289"></p>     
<p align="justify"><a name="t2"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v66n1/art08.2.jpg" width="589" height="330"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    There was a strong  positive correlation between  antioxidant activity  (ABTS) of potato peel  extracts and its total phenolic  content (r=0.99;  p&lt;0.0001) but no significant  correlation was  observed with respect  to total carotenoids, and  it was negative with respect  to lycopene content  (r=-0.81 (p&lt;0.05).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  On the contrary, the correlation coefficient between  antioxidant activity and total phenolics in the  tomato waste extracts was negative (-0.90; (p&#706;0.001)  while was positive with respect to total carotenoid and  lycopene contents (0.83 (p&lt;0.01), and 0.74 (p&lt;0.05),  respectively).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Effect of the extracts on canola oil oxidation  The antioxidant efficacy of the ethanol extracts  towards the stabilization of canola oil was examined.  The extract yields obtained with 80% ethanol were  11.97% of potato skins extracts and 9.9% of tomato  waste extracts. Peroxide value, conjugated dienes and  anisidine value were determined to evaluate the extent  of lipid oxidation during the accelerated storage of canola  oil at 65°C.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  An increase in PV with the increase in the storage  time was observed in all samples (Figure 1A). The  rate of peroxides formation was slower in the first 72  h with respect to the following 72 h, showing an induction  period. A statistically significant diminution  of the PV of 21.1, 67.7, 20.0, and 26.3% in canola oil  samples added with 200 and 400 mg/kg of potato peel  extracts (P200 and P400), and 200 and 400 mg/kg of  tomato waste extracts (T200 and T400), respectively,  was observed after 72 h of storage time. The PV of  canola oil added with BHT was increased by 9.9% at  this storage time.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="f1"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v66n1/art08.3.jpg"></p>     
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Canola oil samples containing either potato peel  extracts (200, 400 mg/kg) or tomato waste extracts  (200, 400 mg/kg) and BHT (200 mg/kg) reached  maximum peroxide values of 18.42, 17.45, 20.45,  19.23, 19.24 meq/kg, respectively. These values were  significantly lower than those obtained in the canola  oil without antioxidants which had a maximum PV of  26.69 meq/kg after 144 h of accelerated storage. The  PV of oils added with P200 and P400 were significantly  lower and that of the oil added with T200 higher  than the PV of the oil with BHT (p&lt;0.05) while there  was no difference between the PV of the oil added  with T400 and that of the oil with BHT (p&gt;0.05).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Figure 1B presents the relative increase in conjugated  dienes (CD) content in the oil samples as  function of storage time at 65°C. The highest content  of conjugated dienes was observed in the canola oil  free of antioxidants which reached a maximum value  of 21.47 after 144 h of storage. This was followed by  T200 (12.96), T400 (5.35), BHT (4.56), P200 (2.98)  and P400 (1.89). The differences with respect to control without antioxidants were highly significant  (p&#706;0.0001). However, the CD content of oils added  with tomato waste extracts was lower than that of the  oil with BHT (p&lt;0.01) whereas the CD content of oils  added with potato peel extracts was higher than that of  the oil with the synthetic antioxidant (p&lt;0.001).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Figure 1C shows the p-anisidine value for canola  oil samples stabilized with ethanolic extracts of pota-  70 Evaluation of extracts from potato and tomato wastes  to and tomato by-products, BHT, and control. Control  oil reached a maximum value of 10.27 after 144  h of storage while BHT, P200, P400, T200 and T400  reached average values of 6.82, 6.94, 7.34, 9.16, and  6.46, respectively. The differences with respect to  control without antioxidants were highly significant  (p&lt;0.01). There was no difference between BHT and  P200 (p=0.41) while oils added with P400 and T200  had AV higher than the oils added with BHT (p&lt;0.05), and the oils added with T400 had AV lower than the  oils with the synthetic antioxidant (p&lt;0.001).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>DISCUSSION</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  There are already some published works about the  potential of potato and tomato waste as antioxidants  (2,5,6,8). However, this study provides new data that  can help to make sustainable the industrialization of  these vegetables. In this work, information about the  antioxidant potential of by-products from potato and  tomato of botanical varieties not reported by other studies  was obtained. Moreover, the relative differences  between the two by-products in terms of the nature of  the compounds responsible for their antioxidant activity  were established.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The proximate analysis of potato and tomato byproducts  showed that these residues are good sources  of fiber and protein. A food product is considered a  “good source” of any nutrient if it provides 10-19%  of the recommended dietary allowance (21). The consumption  of 35 g of these by-products provides more  than 10% of the dietary reference intakes of protein  and fiber in a diet of 2500 kcal. The potential health  benefits of dietary fiber are well documented. The  consumption of dietary fiber reduces the risk of developing  diseases such as diabetes, obesity, coronary  and cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal disorders,  hypertension, strocke, and colon cancer (22).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The composition of potato peels determined in this  work differed from that obtained by Mohdaly et al. (2)  who found values of 6.55% moisture, 8.46% crude fat,  13.9% crude protein, 8.48% ashes, 13.0% crude fiber,  and 56.2% of carbohydrates, in potato peels from Diamond  variety. These differences could be attributed to  variations in culture conditions, method of peeling,  and potato variety. On the other hand, the composition  of tomato residues was similar to that found by Knoblich  et al. (11) for tomato seeds (20.2, 6.4, 53.8, and  5.2% for protein, fat, fiber and ashes, respectively).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Ethanol and methanol were better than acetone  to extract phenolic compounds from the potato and  tomato residues. It is known that the extraction efficiency  of polyphenols depends on the solvent polarity  and on the molecular weight of phenolic components  among other factors (1). The low molecular weight  polyphenols, which predominate in the potato and tomato  residues, are best extracted with methanol and  ethanol which have higher polarity than acetone. Hanson  et al. (23) found values ranging between 29 and  161 mg GAE/100 g in different varieties of tomatoes  while Nawal et al. (8) and Samarin et al. (6) obtained  39 and 52.2 mg GAE/100 g potato peels, respectively,  using methanol as solvent.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  On the other hand, acetone was better solvent than  methanol and ethanol to extract the carotenoid components  of the samples, probably due to their lipidic  nature. Lipids are more soluble in less polar solvents.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The higher amount of these compounds was found  in tomato residues. Tomato and their by-products are  considered an important source of carotenoids and the  major source of lycopene (8,11). In the present work,  a maximum of 294.59 mg/kg total carotenoids and  101.72 mg/kg lycopene was obtained using acetone as  solvent. Knoblich et al. (11) reported 734 mg/kg lycopene  in tomato peels and 130 mg/kg in tomato seeds.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined  by ABTS method which was chosen because it  can be applied to determine antioxidant capacity of  both hydrophilic and hydrophobic antioxidants of  plant extracts (1). The extracts obtained from potato  peels showed to be more efficient ABTS radical scavengers  than extracts obtained from tomato waste  although the latter had the highest levels of carotenoid  compounds. This was due to that phenolic compounds  apparently contributed more to ABTS scavenging activity  than carotenoid compounds. The highest antioxidant  activity was obtained from the extracts with  80% methanol and with 80% ethanol, while the values  obtained with acetone (in which predominate  carotenoid compounds) were very low. The Pearson’s  correlation coefficients indicate that polyphenols are  largely responsible for the antioxidant activity of potato  peel extracts while carotenoids and lycopene are  responsible for the antioxidant activity in tomato residues.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The main antioxidant compounds that have been  identified in potato peels are caffeic acid, chlorogenic  acid, protocatechuic acid, para-hydroxybenzoic acid,  and gallic acid, while in tomato peels are trans-lyco-  pene, cis lycopene, &#946;-carotene, lutein, quercetin, and  kaemperol (8), probably all of them contributed to the  antioxidant activity of the extracts. Due to the the high  content of fiber and antioxidants of potato and tomato  residues they could be used as ingredients of functional  foods.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  Because of their major efficiency, economy and  low toxicity, the ethanol extracts were chosen to evaluate  the antioxidant effectiveness of potato peels and  tomato by-products during oxidation of canola oil.  The extract yields obtained with 80% ethanol were  11.97% of potato skins extracts and 9.9% of tomato  waste extracts. These yields were higher than those  obtained by Mohdaly et al. (24), and Samarin et al.  (6) who obtained 10.15% and 5.65%, respectively, of  ethanol extracts from potato peels, and Nawal et al.  (8) who found 8.14% of methanol extracts from tomato  peels.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  To evaluate the antioxidant efficacy of the extracts  in the stabilization of canola oil, the peroxide value,  conjugated dienes and anisidine value were determined  under accelerated storage. Peroxide value (PV) is  one of the most used tests for the measurement of the  peroxides and hydroperoxides concentration formed  in the primary steps of lipid oxidation (24). The results  showed that the most efficient extract was that obtained  from potato peel in a concentration of 400 mg/  kg, being superior to the BHT synthetic antioxidant. It  has been shown that the flavor scores of oils aged four  days at 60°C are equivalent to scores of oils aged four  months at room temperature (18). Sunflower oil develops  off-flavors at a PV of 13 meq/kg. In the present  work, the canola oil free of antioxidants reached this  value in approximately 3.5 days of treatment (equivalent  to 3.5 months of storage at room temperature),  while the oil with 400 mg/kg of potato peel extract  (that had the best performance) reached this PV in 5.5  days (5.5 months at room temperature).  Although PV is a widely used method to determine  the lipid autoxidation, these results were confirmed  with other oxidation indices such as conjugated dienes  and anisidine value.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  The hydroperoxide formation in the chain of a  polyunsaturated fatty acid starts with the hydrogen  abstraction or the addition of an oxygen radical. This  causes the displacement of a double bond towards the  carbon of the adjacent methylene group, resulting in  the formation of a conjugated diene (25). The measurement  of the UV absorbance at 232 nm (corresponding  to conjugated dienes) is thus a good indicator for  evaluating the initial oxidation process of a fat. The  greater the levels of conjugated dienes, the lower the  oxidative stability of the oil. The results demonstrated  a remarkable diminution in the generation of conjugated  dienes in canola oil added with the extracts of potato  and tomato by-products. Again, the extracts from  potato peels had better performance than the synthetic  antioxidant BHT.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  PV and CD only indicate the extent of oxidation  in the initial stages of lipid oxidation. Hydroperoxides,  the primary oxidation products, are readily decomposed  to form a mixture of volatile compounds,  mainly aldehydes. In this work the p-anisidine (AV)  method was used to determine the secondary oxidative  products of lipid oxidation, particularly 2-alkenals  and 2,4-dienals. It has been demonstrated that AV is  highly correlated with overall odour intensity in heated  oils (26). AV, like PV and CD of all oil samples  added with the antioxidant extracts, was lower than  the control sample, thus showing that the extracts of  potato and tomato waste are efficient in protecting the  oils against oxidation.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>CONCLUSION</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  From the results of the present study, it is clear that  ethanol extracts of potato and tomato waste can be a  good alternative to replace the synthetic antioxidants  used in the protection of vegetable oils and fatty foods  against rancidity. The phenolic compounds rather than  carotenoids appear to be responsible for the antioxidant  activity of these vegetable wastes. On the other  hand, the dry by-products from the industrialization of  potatoes and tomatoes are good sources of fiber, protein  and antioxidants which could be used as functional  food ingredients.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  This work was financed by Instituto Politécnico  Nacional, México (Project SIP20141059).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>REFERENCES</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  1. Dai J, Mumper RJ. Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis  and their antioxidant and anticancer properties.  Molecules 2010, 15: 7313-7352.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532898&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  2. Mohdaly AAA, Sarhan MA, Mahmoud A, Ramadan  MF, Smetanska I. Antioxidant efficacy of potato peels  72 Evaluation of extracts from potato and tomato wastes  and sugar beet pulp extracts in vegetable oils protection.  Food Chem. 2010, 123: 1019-1026.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532900&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  3. Deshpande SS. Handbook of food toxicology. CRC  Press. New York, USA, 2002, pp. 253-257.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  4. Abdelazim AA, Mahmoud A, Ramadan-Hassanien  MF. Oxidative stability of vegetable oils as affected by  sesame extracts during accelerated oxidative storage.  J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50: 868-878.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532903&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  5. Sultana B, Anwar F, Asi MR, Chatha SA. Antioxidant  potential of extracts from different agro waste: stabilization  of corn oil. Grasas y Aceites. 2008, 59: 205-  217.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532905&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  6. Samarin A M, Poorazarang H, Hematyar N, Elhamirad  A. Phenolics in potato peels: extraction and utilization  as natural antioxidants. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012,  18: 191-195.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532907&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  7. Babbar N, Singh HO, Kaur SS, Kumar VB. Influence  of different solvents in extraction of phenolic compounds  from vegetable residues and their evaluation  as natural sources of antioxidants. J. Food Sci. Tech.  2014, 51: 2568-2575.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532909&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  8. Nawal NZ, Zeitoun MAM, Barbary OM. Utilization  of some vegetables and fruits waste as natural antioxidants.  Alex. J.Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 5: 1-11.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532911&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  9. FAOSTAT database 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization  of the United Nations. Available at <a href="http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E">http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E</a> .</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  10. Al-Weshahy A, El-Nokety M, Bakhete M, Rao V.  Effect of storage on antioxidant activity of freezedried  potato peels. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50: 507-512.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532914&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  11. Knoblich M, Anderson B, Latshaw D. Analyses of tomato  peel and seed byproducts and the use as a source  of carotenoids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85: 1166-  1170.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532916&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  12. Shieber A, Aranda SMD. Potato peels: a source of  nutritionally and pharmacologically interesting compounds  – A Review. Food. 2009, 3: 23-29.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532918&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  13. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC Intl.  16th ed. Methods 920.39c, 923.03, 928.08, 950.46.  Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington,  DC., 1995</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  14. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM.  Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates  and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu  reagent. Methods of Enzymology 1999, 299: 152-178.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532921&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  15. Scott KJ. Detection and measurement of carotenoids  by UV/VIS spectrophotometry. In: Current protocols  in food analytical chemistry. pp. F2.2.1-F2.2.10.  Wrolstad RE (ed). John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New  York, USA., 2001.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  16. Fish WW, Perkins-Veazie P, Collins JK. A quantitative  assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes  of organic solvents. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002, 15:  309-317.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532924&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  17. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang  M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an  improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay.  Free Radical Bio. Med. 1999, 26: 1231-1237.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532926&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  18. Warner K, Frankel EN, Mounts TL. Flavor and oxidative  stability of soybean, sunflower and low-erucic  acid rapessed oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1989, 66:  558-564 .    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532928&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  19. AOCS. Official methods and recommended practices  of the AOCS. 5th ed. Method Cd 18-90. American Oil  Chemists’ Society, Champaign, IL., USA., 1999.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  20. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments.  John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, NY., 2003.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  21. COVENIN 2952-1: 1997. Directrices para la declaración  de propiedades nutricionales y de salud en el  rotulado de los alimentos envasados. Comisión venezolana  de normas industriales, Venezuela, 1997.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  22. Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH, Ferrreri S, Knudtson  M, Koraym A, Waters V, Williams CL. Health benefits  of dietary fiber. Nutr. Rev. 67:188-205.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532933&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  23. Hanson PM, Yang R, Wu J, Chen J, Ledesma D, Tsou  SCS. Variation for antioxidant activity and antioxidants  in tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129:  704-711.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532935&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  24. Mohdaly AAA, Sarhan MA, Smetanska I, Mahmoud,  A. Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts  of potato peel, sugar beet pulp and sesame cake. J. Sci.  Food Agric. 2010, 90: 218-226.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532937&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  25. Repetto M, Semprine J, Boveris A. Lipid peroxidation:  Chemical Mechanism, Biological Implications  and Analytical Determination. pp. 3-30. In: Biochemistry,  Genetics and Molecular Biology. A. Catala  (ed). InTech Publisher, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  26. Tomkins C, Perkins EG.The evaluation of frying oils  with p-Anisidine value. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999,  76: 945-947.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=532940&pid=S0004-0622201600010000800018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">  <b>Recibido:</b> 11-10-2015  <b>Aceptado:</b> 31-12-2015</font></p>       ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mumper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Molecules]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>7313-7352</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohdaly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AAA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramadan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smetanska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Antioxidant efficacy of potato peels 72 Evaluation of extracts from potato and tomato wastes and sugar beet pulp extracts in vegetable oils protection]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Chem.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>123</volume>
<page-range>1019-1026</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdelazim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramadan-Hassanien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Oxidative stability of vegetable oils as affected by sesame extracts during accelerated oxidative storage]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Food Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>868-878</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sultana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anwar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chatha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Antioxidant potential of extracts from different agro waste: stabilization of corn oil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Grasas y Aceites.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<page-range>205- 217</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Samarin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poorazarang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hematyar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elhamirad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phenolics in potato peels: extraction and utilization as natural antioxidants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World Appl. Sci. J.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>191-195</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Babbar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HO]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of different solvents in extraction of phenolic compounds from vegetable residues and their evaluation as natural sources of antioxidants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Food Sci. Tech.]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>2568-2575</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nawal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NZ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zeitoun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MAM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbary]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Utilization of some vegetables and fruits waste as natural antioxidants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Alex. J.Food Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>1-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Weshahy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Nokety]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bakhete]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of storage on antioxidant activity of freezedried potato peels]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Res. Int.]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>507-512</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knoblich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latshaw]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and the use as a source of carotenoids]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Sci. Food Agric.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<page-range>1166- 1170</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shieber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SMD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Potato peels: a source of nutritionally and pharmacologically interesting compounds - A Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>23-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singleton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Orthofer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamuela-Raventós]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Methods of Enzymology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>299</volume>
<page-range>152-178</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fish]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perkins-Veazie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Collins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A quantitative assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Food Compos. Anal.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>309-317</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Re]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pellegrini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Proteggente]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pannala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rice-Evans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Free Radical Bio. Med.]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>1231-1237</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frankel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mounts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Flavor and oxidative stability of soybean sunflower and low-erucic acid rapessed oils]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>558-564</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrreri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knudtson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koraym]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waters]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Health benefits of dietary fiber]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nutr. Rev.]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>188-205</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hanson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ledesma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tsou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SCS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Variation for antioxidant activity and antioxidants in tomato]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>129</volume>
<page-range>704-711</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohdaly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AAA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smetanska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahmoud,]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of potato peel sugar beet pulp and sesame cake]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Sci. Food Agric.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>90</volume>
<page-range>218-226</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The evaluation of frying oils with p-Anisidine value]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<page-range>945-947</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
