<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0378-1844</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Interciencia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[INCI]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0378-1844</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASOCIACIÓN INTERCIENCIA]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0378-18442002000800003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[changes in forest biomass, litter dynamics and soils following shifting cultivation in southern mexico: an overview]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Deborah]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Duke University  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Harvard University Harvard Forest ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<fpage>400</fpage>
<lpage>408</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0378-18442002000800003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0378-18442002000800003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0378-18442002000800003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se evaluó el impacto relativo de los condicionantes ambientales y los efectos del uso de la tierra a nivel de lotes, sobre procesos del ecosistema en un bosque tropical seco del sur de la Península de Yucatán, a través del muestreo a lo largo de gradientes naturales y hechos por el hombre. Los objetivos fueron 1) describir los gradientes ambientales naturales de precipitación y suelos en escala regional, 2) explorar la respuesta de propiedades clave y procesos del ecosistema a tales gradientes, y 3) comprender los efectos de la edad del bosque sobre lotes dentro de una región dada del gradiente. Se estudiaron la biomasa superficial (viva y detrítica), la producción y química de hojarasca, y los suelos. En cada uno de 3 sitios con un gradiente de lluvia estacional entre 900-1400 mm/año se muestrearon 10 a 13 lotes, incluyendo bosque secundario y maduro. La caída de hojarasca aumentó y su contenido de nutrientes bajó en el pico de la estación seca. En el bosque maduro los factores ambientales asociados al gradiente de precipitación limitaron la producción de hojarasca, biomasa y materia orgánica del suelo. La historia humana del área, incluyendo la tala y decisiones acerca de áreas no afectadas (p. e. vertientes altas), añadió información crítica para comprender diferencias en la biomasa superficial del bosque maduro. Todos los aspectos de estructura y función en bosques secundarios jóvenes (biomasa viva superficial, producción de hojarasca, masa en el piso y propiedades críticas del suelo) están fuertemente influenciadas por la edad del lote. La recuperación de los niveles de bosque maduro se estima conservadoramente en 55-95 años. P y/o N parecen limitar procesos esenciales del ecosistema como producción de hojarasca, descomposición y biomasa superficial. Se sugiere que una vez superada la limitación de agua, el P se hace limitante. La evidencia incluye mayor reabsorción de P de la hojarasca, una fuerte respuesta de la concentración de P, pero no de la de N, al gradiente de precipitación, y un aumento en la eficiencia de uso de P con el aumento en la edad del lote. La presencia de humanos en el sur de Yucatán resulta en mayores cambios del ecosistema que aquellos inducidos por variación natural del ambiente en escala regional. Para comprender mejor estos paisajes y para llevar estudios puntuales a evaluaciones regionales y globales, resulta vital integrar los impactos humanos en los procesos del ecosistema.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Sampling along natural and human-made gradients, we evaluated the relative impact of broad environmental drivers and stand-level effects of land use on ecosystem processes in a dry tropical forest of the southern Yucatan peninsula. The objectives were to 1) describe natural environmental gradients in precipitation and soils at the regional scale, 2) explore the response of key ecosystem properties and processes to these gradients, and 3) understand the effects of forest age on stands within a given region of the gradient. Aboveground biomass (live and detrital), litter production and chemistry, and soils were studied. Ten to 13 stands, including secondary and mature forests, were sampled in each of 3 sites spanning a highly seasonal rainfall gradient of 900-1400 mm/yr. Litterfall increased and litter nutrient concentrations decreased at the peak of the dry season. In mature forest, environmental factors associated with the precipitation gradient did constrain litter production, forest floor mass and soil organic matter. To understand differences in the live aboveground biomass of mature forests, the human history of the area added critical information, including logging history and decisions about untouched areas (e.g. upper slopes). All aspects of structure and function in young secondary forests (live aboveground biomass, litter production, forest floor mass, and critical soil properties) are strongly influenced by the age of the stand. Recovery to current mature forest levels is conservatively estimated to take 55-95 years. P and/or N seem to limit essential ecosystem processes, such as litter production, decomposition and aboveground biomass. We suggest that once water limitation is alleviated, P becomes limiting. Evidence includes greater reabsorption of P from litter, a strong response to the precipitation gradient of P but not N concentration and total inputs, and an increase in P-use efficiency with increasing stand age. The presence of humans in the Southern Yucatan results in ecosystem changes that are greater than those induced by natural, environmental variation at the regional scale. For the best understanding of these landscapes, and for scaling up from case studies to regional and global assessments, integrating human impacts on ecosystem processes is vital.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Avaliou-se o impacto relativo dos condicionantes ambientais e os efeitos do uso da terra a nível de lotes, sobre processos do ecossistema em um bosque tropical seco do sul da Península de Yucatán, através da amostragem ao longo de gradientes naturais e feitos pelo homem. Os objetivos foram 1) descrever os gradientes ambientais naturais de precipitação e solos em escala regional, 2) explorar a resposta de propriedades clave e processos do ecossistema a tais gradientes, e 3) compreender os efeitos da idade do bosque sobre lotes dentro de uma determinada região do gradiente. Estudaram-se a biomassa superficial (viva e detrítica), a produção e química de hojarasca, e os solos. Em cada um de 3 sítios com um gradiente de chuva estacional entre 900-1400 mm/ano mostraram-se 10 a 13 lotes, incluindo bosque secundário e maduro. A caída de hojarasca aumentou e seu conteúdo de nutrientes baixou no auge da estação seca. No bosque maduro os fatores ambientais associados ao gradiente de precipitação limitaram a produção de hojarasca, biomassa e matéria orgânica do solo. A história humana da área, incluindo a tala e decisões sobre as áreas não afetadas (p. e. vertentes altas), acrecentou informação crítica para compreender diferenças na biomassa superficial do bosque maduro. Todos os aspectos de estrutura e função em bosques secundários jovens (biomassa viva superficial, produção de hojarasca, massa no chão e propriedades críticas do solo) estão fortemente influenciadas pela idade do lote. A recuperação dos níveis de bosque maduro estima-se conservadoramente em 55-95 anos. P e/ou N parecem limitar processos essenciais do ecossistema como produção de hojarasca, decomposição e biomassa superficial. Se sugere que uma vez superada a limitação de agua, o P se faz limitante. A evidência inclui maior reabsorção de P da hojarasca, uma forte resposta da concentração de P, mas não da de N, ao gradiente de precipitação, e um aumento na eficiência de uso de P com o aumento na idade do lote. A presença de humanos no sul de Yucatán resulta em maiores mudanças do ecossistema que aqueles induzidos por variação natural do ambiente em escala regional. Para compreender melhor estas paisagens e para levar estudos pontuais a avaliações regionais e globais, resulta vital integrar os impactos humanos nos processos do ecossistema.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Nutrient Cycling]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Land Use Change]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Forest Recovery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Phosphorus]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Nitrogen]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <B><FONT size=4>     <P align=justify>CHANGES IN FOREST BIOMASS, LITTER DYNAMICS AND SOILS FOLLOWING  SHIFTING CULTIVATION IN SOUTHERN MEXICO: AN OVERVIEW</P></B></FONT>     <P align=center>Deborah Lawrence and David Foster</P>     <P align=justify>Deborah Lawrence.<B> B.A. Harvard University. Ph.D. Duke  University. Address: Department of Environmental Sciences, University of  Virginia, P. O. Box 400123, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4123, USA. e-mail:  lawrence@virginia.edu</P></B>     <P align=justify>David Foster.<B> B.A. Connecticut College. M.S. and Ph.D.  University of Minnesota. Address: Harvard Forest, Harvard University, P. O. Box  68, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366, USA.</P>     <P align=justify>Resumen</P></B><I>     <P align=justify>Se evaluó el impacto relativo de los condicionantes ambientales  y los efectos del uso de la tierra a nivel de lotes, sobre procesos del  ecosistema en un bosque tropical seco del sur de la Península de Yucatán, a  través del muestreo a lo largo de gradientes naturales y hechos por el hombre.  Los objetivos fueron 1) describir los gradientes ambientales naturales de  precipitación y suelos en escala regional, 2) explorar la respuesta de  propiedades clave y procesos del ecosistema a tales gradientes, y 3) comprender  los efectos de la edad del bosque sobre lotes dentro de una región dada del  gradiente. Se estudiaron la biomasa superficial (viva y detrítica), la  producción y química de hojarasca, y los suelos. En cada uno de 3 sitios con un  gradiente de lluvia estacional entre 900-1400 mm/año se muestrearon 10 a 13  lotes, incluyendo bosque secundario y maduro. La caída de hojarasca aumentó y su  contenido de nutrientes bajó en el pico de la estación seca. En el bosque maduro  los factores ambientales asociados al gradiente de precipitación limitaron la  producción de hojarasca, biomasa y materia orgánica del suelo. La historia  humana del área, incluyendo la tala y decisiones acerca de áreas no afectadas  (p. e. vertientes altas), añadió información crítica para comprender diferencias  en la biomasa superficial del bosque maduro. Todos los aspectos de estructura y  función en bosques secundarios jóvenes (biomasa viva superficial, producción de  hojarasca, masa en el piso y propiedades críticas del suelo) están fuertemente  influenciadas por la edad del lote. La recuperación de los niveles de bosque  maduro se estima conservadoramente en 55-95 años. P y/o N parecen limitar  procesos esenciales del ecosistema como producción de hojarasca, descomposición  y biomasa superficial. Se sugiere que una vez superada la limitación de agua, el  P se hace limitante. La evidencia incluye mayor reabsorción de P de la  hojarasca, una fuerte respuesta de la concentración de P, pero no de la de N, al  gradiente de precipitación, y un aumento en la eficiencia de uso de P con el  aumento en la edad del lote. La presencia de humanos en el sur de Yucatán  resulta en mayores cambios del ecosistema que aquellos inducidos por variación  natural del ambiente en escala regional. Para comprender mejor estos paisajes y  para llevar estudios puntuales a evaluaciones regionales y globales, resulta  vital integrar los impactos humanos en los procesos del ecosistema.</I></P>     <P align=justify><B>Summary</P> </B><I>     <P align=justify>Sampling along natural and human-made gradients, we evaluated  the relative impact of broad environmental drivers and stand-level effects of  land use on ecosystem processes in a dry tropical forest of the southern Yucatan  peninsula. The objectives were to 1) describe natural environmental gradients in  precipitation and soils at the regional scale, 2) explore the response of key  ecosystem properties and processes to these gradients, and 3) understand the  effects of forest age on stands within a given region of the gradient.  Aboveground biomass (live and detrital), litter production and chemistry, and  soils were studied. Ten to 13 stands, including secondary and mature forests,  were sampled in each of 3 sites spanning a highly seasonal rainfall gradient of  900-1400 mm/yr. Litterfall increased and litter nutrient concentrations  decreased at the peak of the dry season. In mature forest, environmental factors  associated with the precipitation gradient did constrain litter production,  forest floor mass and soil organic matter. To understand differences in the live  aboveground biomass of mature forests, the human history of the area added  critical information, including logging history and decisions about untouched  areas (e.g. upper slopes). All aspects of structure and function in young  secondary forests (live aboveground biomass, litter production, forest floor  mass, and critical soil properties) are strongly influenced by the age of the  stand. Recovery to current mature forest levels is conservatively estimated to  take 55-95 years. P and/or N seem to limit essential ecosystem processes, such  as litter production, decomposition and aboveground biomass. We suggest that  once water limitation is alleviated, P becomes limiting. Evidence includes  greater reabsorption of P from litter, a strong response to the precipitation  gradient of P but not N concentration and total inputs, and an increase in P-use  efficiency with increasing stand age. The presence of humans in the Southern  Yucatan results in ecosystem changes that are greater than those induced by  natural, environmental variation at the regional scale. For the best  understanding of these landscapes, and for scaling up from case studies to  regional and global assessments, integrating human impacts on ecosystem  processes is vital.</P></I><B>     <P align=justify>Resumo</P></B><I>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>Avaliou-se o impacto relativo dos condicionantes ambientais e  os efeitos do uso da terra a nível de lotes, sobre processos do ecossistema em  um bosque tropical seco do sul da Península de Yucatán, através da amostragem ao  longo de gradientes naturais e feitos pelo homem. Os objetivos foram 1)  descrever os gradientes ambientais naturais de precipitação e solos em escala  regional, 2) explorar a resposta de propriedades clave e processos do  ecossistema a tais gradientes, e 3) compreender os efeitos da idade do bosque  sobre lotes dentro de uma determinada região do gradiente. Estudaram-se a  biomassa superficial (viva e detrítica), a produção e química de hojarasca, e os  solos. Em cada um de 3 sítios com um gradiente de chuva estacional entre  900-1400 mm/ano mostraram-se 10 a 13 lotes, incluindo bosque secundário e  maduro. A caída de hojarasca aumentou e seu conteúdo de nutrientes baixou no  auge da estação seca. No bosque maduro os fatores ambientais associados ao  gradiente de precipitação limitaram a produção de hojarasca, biomassa e matéria  orgânica do solo. A história humana da área, incluindo a tala e decisões sobre  as áreas não afetadas (p. e. vertentes altas), acrecentou informação crítica  para compreender diferenças na biomassa superficial do bosque maduro. Todos os  aspectos de estrutura e função em bosques secundários jovens (biomassa viva  superficial, produção de hojarasca, massa no chão e propriedades críticas do  solo) estão fortemente influenciadas pela idade do lote. A recuperação dos  níveis de bosque maduro estima-se conservadoramente em 55-95 anos. P e/ou N  parecem limitar processos essenciais do ecossistema como produção de hojarasca,  decomposição e biomassa superficial. Se sugere que uma vez superada a limitação  de agua, o P se faz limitante. A evidência inclui maior reabsorção de P da  hojarasca, uma forte resposta da concentração de P, mas não da de N, ao  gradiente de precipitação, e um aumento na eficiência de uso de P com o aumento  na idade do lote. A presença de humanos no sul de Yucatán resulta em maiores  mudanças do ecossistema que aqueles induzidos por variação natural do ambiente  em escala regional. Para compreender melhor estas paisagens e para levar estudos  pontuais a avaliações regionais e globais, resulta vital integrar os impactos  humanos nos processos do ecossistema.</P></I><B>     <P align=justify>KEYWORDS / Nutrient Cycling / Land Use Change / Forest Recovery  / Phosphorus / Nitrogen /</P></B>     <P align=justify>Received: 01/15/2002. Modified: 06/17/2002. Accepted:  07/02/2002</P>     <P align=justify>Over the past four decades the southern Yucatan peninsular  region has undergone increasing amounts and intensity of land use change,  ranging from selective logging to widespread shifting cultivation agriculture to  land clearing for intensive agriculture and village establishment. These land  uses alter the structure and function of forested lands and often generate new  feedbacks in terms of subsequent human use. Consequently, a major goal in  assessing regional environmental change is to understand how biogeochemical  processes respond to land use change, emphasizing the potential of a  human-dominated landscape to sustain continued human use. One of the greatest  challenges in these studies is to distinguish the effects of environmental  gradients in climate, geology or natural disturbance from the effects of human  activity. In the Southern Yucatan Peninsula Region project (SYPR), our approach  to this challenge has been to investigate ecosystem processes in several study  sites arrayed across the dominant environmental gradients while focusing on the  influence of local, human-controlled factors within a given area.</P>     <P align=justify>In the southern Yucatan, annual precipitation increases by more  than 50% over 120km from the northeastern border of the Calakmul Biosphere  Reserve to the Guatemalan Border. Median annual precipitation varies from ca.  900mm in the north of our study area to ca. 1400mm in the south. This range  encompasses approximately 50% of the variation in precipitation of dry tropical  forests worldwide (Murphy and Lugo, 1986). Thus, the gradient represents a broad  sampling of the environment of the southern Yucatan peninsula and provides data  relevant to many other dry forests. Rainfall is highly variable on an annual and  a monthly basis, but all sites share a distinct seasonal pattern regardless of  total annual precipitation. A pronounced dry period (&lt;50 mm/mo) may begin as  early as November or December, but often begins in January. It may last from  three to seven months, depending on the year and the latitude <A HREF="#Fig1"> (Figure 1)</A></P>     <P align=justify>The major stand-level factors determining the rate and dynamics  of ecosystem processes are forest age, cultivation history, and management (land  use type and landowner practices). Because shifting cultivation of maize (milpa)  is the dominant cause of deforestation in the region (Turner <I>et al</I>.,  2001), forest recovery following this kind of disturbance was the central focus  of investigations. The main objective of this study was to assess how nutrient  cycling, productivity and biomass change throughout the course of secondary  forest development following (temporary) abandonment of agricultural land.  Plot-based studies of forest recovery within stands at a given site were placed  into a broader context by comparing data across sites. This allowed us to test  for the influence of regional environmental drivers.</P>     <P align=justify>The two-tiered conceptual approach, investigating local sites  within a regional framework, facilitates an understanding of the multiple  constraints on the trajectory of individual patches on the landscape. The  landscape under shifting cultivation consists of many such patches at various  stages of recovery. The approach employed also makes it possible to characterize  the structure and function of the entire landscape at any one point in time, and  to project it into the future, through integration with predictive models  (Geoghegan <I>et al</I>., 2001). Before making projections, it is necessary to  understand current constraints on forest recovery in the SYPR. With that goal in  mind, three questions are addressed in this paper:</P>     <P align=justify>1) What are the regional environmental influences on forest  processes at the scale of 10s to 100s of kilometers? Do precipitation and soil  fertility vary significantly at this scale?</P>     <P align=justify>2) How do natural environmental gradients in soil and  precipitation affect ecosystem processes and characteristics?</P>     <P align=justify>3) Within a given region, how do ecosystem processes vary as a  function of forest age?</P><B>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>Methods</P></B><I>     <P align=justify>Study sites</P></I>     <P align=justify>Field work was concentrated in three study sites positioned  60-120km apart in order to sample across the regional precipitation gradient   <A HREF="#Fig2"> (Figure 2)</A>. Thirteen stands were studied in El Refugio (ER), the driest site  (ca. 890mm/yr) near the northeastern border of Calakmul Biosphere Reserve in the  State of Campeche. At Nicolás Bravo (NB), an area of intermediate rainfall (ca.  1150mm/yr) 60km to the southeast in the State of Quintana Roo, an additional 13  stands were studied. Approximately 120km south of ER on the border of Quintana  Roo, Campeche, and Guatemala, 10 stands were studied in the village of Arroyo  Negro (AN), the wettest part of the study area (ca. 1400mm/yr). Stands were  sampled in both mature forest (2-3 per site) and secondary forest fallows  regenerating after shifting cultivation of maize (8-10 per site). The mature  forest stands were at least 50 years old (Read and Lawrence, in press) and had  not been cleared for agriculture in recent history. None of the fallow stands  had received inputs of fertilizer, pesticide, or herbicide. The secondary forest  stands ranged in age from 2-25 years since the last harvest <A HREF="#TabI"> (Table I)</A>. Despite  the absence of stumps or other evidence of past disturbance in the immediate  vicinity of our stands, all of the forests may have experienced selective timber  extraction in the last 40-100 years (Klepeis and Turner, 2001).</P>     <P align=justify>Secondary forest stands were selected from the database  compiled by the socio-economic members of our research team (see Geoghegan <I>et  al</I>., 2001, Klepeis and Turner, 2001). We used information on the historical  details of individual parcels, units of ownership and management by a single  household. A parcel may encompass open, cultivated lands and forest stands of  different age depending on when they were last used for cultivation. Information  on parcel history made it possible to account for confounding factors such as  differences in prior land use type, intensity of cultivation, and use of  chemical inputs. These factors can modify the trajectory of recovery and should  be sampled explicitly rather than inadvertently (e.g. Bushbacher <I>et al</I>.,  1988, Fernandes and Sanford, 1995, Hughes <I>et al</I>., 1999). The effect of  cultivation history was investigated in a separate paper, we deal primarily with  forest age and regional environmental gradients in this study.<A NAME="Fig1"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img1.jpg" width="554" height="411"></P><FONT size=2>     
<P align=justify> <A HREF="#Fig1"> Figure 1</A>. Monthly precipitation in the area of the principal  study sites for the period 1986-1998 (courtesy of Instituto Nacional de  Geografía Estadística e Informática, INEGI, Mexico). Records from the three  villages nearest to the study sites: Zoh Laguna, 20km south of El Refugio,  Nicolás Bravo, and Agua Blanca, 70km east-northeast of Arroyo. Zero  precipitation values indicate missing data. Data from extreme storm events in  1988 and 1993 were clipped.</P>     <P align=justify></FONT>In each of the three study sites, several parcels were located  containing young, middle-aged, and old fallow stands. Although clearing and  cultivation practices may differ by landowner, within a given farmer’s parcel it  is possible to minimize management differences while also minimizing local  differences in soil texture, inherent soil fertility, and topography. Thus, in  establishing chronosequences within a given parcel, we expect to sample the  effects of forest age, rather than the effects of contrasting management  approaches or subtle edaphic variation. The true sampling unit was, in a sense,  the farmer. The various forest stands owned by each farmer represents one  trajectory of forest recovery. This approach, using the uniformity of practice  within farm ownership is unusual and was facilitated by the cross-disciplinary  nature of our project.</P> <I>     <P align=justify>Litter production and nutrient cycling</P></I>     <P align=justify>One 500m2 circular plot was established in each stand within a  given parcel  <A HREF="#Fig3"> (Figure 3)</A>. Litter was collected once a month (Nov. 1998 - Jan.  2000) in four 1m2 litter traps per plot. The plots were located permanently,  about 20cm off the ground and 8m from the center along orthogonal axes. Fine  litter (leaves, reproductive material, bark and wood &lt;2cm diam.) was  separated from coarse litter (bark and wood &gt;2cm in diam.), dried at &lt;70°C  and weighed. The nutrient content (C, N, and P) of the fine litter was used to  gauge the effects of land use change and forest recovery on nutrient cycling  (c.f. Odum, 1969, Vitousek, 1984, Proctor <I>et al</I>., 1983). The dry mass of  fine litter was used as an index of productivity. Although biomass accumulation  in stems and branches represent a substantial portion of productivity in  secondary forests, our analysis suggests that the rate is constant throughout  the first 25 years of growth at approximately 3-4 Mg/ha/yr (Read and Lawrence,  in press). Furthermore, the rate of litter production was found to be 50-100%  higher than total biomass production across the study area.<A NAME="Fig2"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img2.jpg" width="400" height="324"></P><FONT size=2>     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=center> <A HREF="#Fig2"> Figure 2</A>. Map of study sites in the Southern Yucatan Peninsula  Region (SYPR), Mexico.</P></FONT> <A NAME="TabI"> </A>    <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img3.jpg" width="650" height="902"></P>     
<P align=center>&nbsp;</P> <A NAME="Fig3"> </A>    <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img4.jpg" width="303" height="246"></P>     
<P align=center>&nbsp;</P><FONT size=2>     <P align=justify> <A HREF="#Fig3"> Figure 3</A>. Methods for sampling soil, litter and vegetation. All  trees &gt;10cm dbh were measured for dbh in one circular 500m2 plot within the  stand. Stems 5-10cm dbh were measured in a central 100m2 plot and stems 1-5cm  dbh were measured in three 10m2 plots. Tree heights were measured at 13 points  systematically arrayed throughout the plot. Permanent litter traps (1m2) were  established 8m from the plot center along orthogonal axes. Forest floor mass was  measured in 1m2 plots adjacent to litter traps. Eight soil cores were taken  around each litter trap to a depth of 15cm. </P></FONT>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P><I>     <P align=justify>Aboveground biomass</P></I>     <P align=justify>In each plot, aboveground biomass was sampled, including live  vegetation and detritus. To estimate the biomass of detritus on the forest  floor, all fine litter was sampled in four 1m2 areas, each 1-2m from an existing  litter trap, during Nov. and Dec. 1998. This data yields a low estimate of  forest floor biomass as peak litterfall had occurred in all regions and all  forest ages eight to nine months prior. All stems &gt;10cm in diameter at breast  height (dbh) were recorded for the entire 500m2 plot. A nested design was used  to sample smaller stems, with stems 5-10cm dbh measured in a central 100m2 plot,  and stems 1-5cm dbh measured in three 10m2 plots (see  <A HREF="#Fig3"> Figure 3</A>; Read and  Lawrence, in press). At 13 systematically arrayed points within the large plot,  measurements of height and diameter were taken on the nearest individual in each  dbh class. These data (1395 trees from all plots) were used to create  regressions to estimate heights for all trees sampled. Then, standing live  biomass was estimated from dbh, height and wood density, using established  regressions based on studies of dry tropical forest of similar structure (cf.  Martínez-Yrizar <I>et al</I>., 1992; see Read and Lawrence, in press for further  details).</P><I>     <P align=justify>Soil properties</P></I>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>In each stand, composite samples (32 cores per plot) were  collected of the top 15cm of mineral soil  <A HREF="#Fig3"> Figure 3</A>. Sieved, air-dried samples  (one composite per stand) were analyzed for physical and chemical properties by  Brookside Laboratories (New Knoxville, OH). To assess regional soil differences  while avoiding the confounding influences of shifting cultivation, mature forest  soils were compared. To determine changes in soil properties as a function of  forest age, stands were divided into three secondary forest age classes (2-5  y.o., 6-10 y.o., and 12-25 y.o.) plus mature forests, and analyzed without  regard to region. Secondary forest age classes were based on apparent physical  similarities and the degree of certainty with which actual age could be  determined. As stated previously, mature forest stands had not been cleared for  agriculture in the past 100 years.<A NAME="Fig4"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img5.jpg" width="450" height="304"></P><FONT size=2>     
<P align=justify> <A HREF="#Fig4"> Figure 4</A>. Seasonal pattern of fine litter production (leaves,  twigs, and wood &lt;2cm in diameter). Mean ±SE across all plots within a given  region. Variation indicative of the range in productivity as a function of  forest age. Region is indicated by symbol as shown in legend.</FONT></P>     <P align=justify><B>Results and Discussion</P></B><I>     <P align=justify>Effects of seasonal variation in rainfall</P></I>     <P align=justify>As in the dry forests of Western Mexico and portions of the  Northern Yucatan, and in the wetter forests of Guatemala further south, litter  production in the southern Yucatan peninsula was strongly tied to the timing of  precipitation (Kunkel Westphal and Kunkel, 1979, Martínez-Yrizar and Sarukhan,  1990, Whigham <I>et al</I>., 1990). Both the production and nutrient  concentration of litter responded to seasonal drought from Dec. to May. Fine  litter production was relatively constant throughout most of the year, at 25-30  g/m2/mo. Several months into the dry season, however, litterfall increased  five-fold, apparently due to water stress (Reich and Borchert, 1984, Holbrook  <I>et al</I>., 1995;  <A HREF="#Fig4"> (Figure 4)</A>. Thirty percent of total annual litter production  fell during the peak, between Mar. and Apr., and roughly 60% fell from Jan. to  May.<A NAME="Fig5"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img6.jpg" width="450" height="320"></P> <FONT size=2>     
<P align=center><A HREF="#Fig5"> Figure 5</A>. Seasonal pattern in litter nitrogen and phosphorus  concentrations. Mean ±SE for all 36 plots.</P></FONT>     <P align=justify>Litter nutrient concentrations reached their minima during peak  litterfall  <A HREF="#Fig5"> (Figure 5)</A>; Read and Lawrence, submitted). This evidence suggests that  the trees reabsorbed essential nutrients prior to massive leaf loss (Chapin,  1980, Killingbeck, 1996). Litter P concentrations were reduced 47% from the  maximum observed in a given site. In contrast, litter N concentrations were  reduced by only 33% (Read and Lawrence, submitted). Lower nutrient  concentrations in the dry season have been reported elsewhere as well, in both  wetter and drier forests (Swift <I>et al</I>., 1981, Wieder and Wright, 1995,  McGrath <I>et al</I>., 2001). Despite a reduction in nutrient concentration, the  increase in litterfall during the dry season is likely to result in a pulse of  nutrients with the onset of the rains in June (Swift <I>et al</I>., 1981, Singh  <I>et al</I>., 1989, Campo <I>et al</I>., 1998, McGrath <I>et al</I>., 2001).  The entire SYPR is likely to exhibit a similar pattern of highly seasonal soil  nutrient dynamics.</P> <A NAME="TabII"> </A>    <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img7.jpg" width="650" height="722"></P>     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>&nbsp;<I>Soil gradients: driver of inter-regional variability  and consequence of land </P>     <P>use history</P></I>     <P align=justify>Although the study area is relatively homogeneous in topography  and parent material, the physical and chemical properties of mature forest soils  did vary <A HREF="#TabII"> (Table II)</A>. Some of this variation results from interactions between  vegetation and soils through geologic time. It may also be caused by differences  in the intensity of historic land use during the past century. It could also  result from ancient Mayan activity. An important part of the variation,  especially in soil organic matter, is most likely a result of the regional  precipitation gradient. In particular, the southern site tended to have a higher  organic matter content, as expected if litter inputs were higher due to greater  precipitation (c.f. Vitousek, 1984). Other aspects of soil variation, such as  the higher percentage of sand-sized particles at AN may relate to the  topographic position of the sampled stands. Over time, smaller particles tend to  move downslope, leaving a coarser soil texture at the top of a catena (Brady,  1990). Mature sites in AN were somewhat higher and closer to the ridge top.  Sites in ER and NB were lower on the slope.</P>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P>     <P align=justify>Soil pH was generally quite high across the region (7.4-7.7) as  a result of parent material rich in calcium carbonate. However, the Ca content  of soils in NB was significantly lower than that of the other two sites.  Consequently, soils in NB also had lower pH and lower concentrations of total  exchangeable cations. Overall fertility may be lower in NB given lower levels of  soluble sulfur and higher concentrations of detrimental and potentially toxic  metals (Al, Cu, Fe, and Mn; <A HREF="#TabII"> Table II</A>). This lower fertility could reflect the  longer history of agriculture there. ER and AN were established 20-30 years ago,  but NB has been settled since the 1950s. NB has large areas of Bracken fern, an  invasive species whose dominance may be facilitated by nutrient-poor soils  (Suazo, 1998) and/or by repeated fire such as that associated with shifting  cultivation.<A NAME="Fig6"> </A></P>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img8.jpg" width="493" height="142"></P><FONT size=2>     
<P align=justify>&nbsp;</P>     <P align=justify><A HREF="#Fig6"> Figure 6</A>. Aboveground live biomass (&gt;1cm dbh) (a), annual  fine litter production (b) and forest floor biomass (c) in mature forests, by  study region. ER = El Refugio (n=3), NB = Nicolás Bravo (n=3), AN = Arroyo Negro  (n=2). Mean ±SE for all plots within a region. Statistically significant  differences between regions indicated by different letters.</P></FONT>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>Unlike the other indices of fertility noted above, K levels  were significantly higher in NB. This result is consistent with more rapid  turnover of organic matter or greater amounts of material cycling through the  forest floor litter layer. In either case, K could accumulate in the mineral  soil due to greater leaching from litter on the forest floor. This is not  incongruent with limitations on productivity due to soil fertility. Rapid  nutrient cycling through the litter can be an important mechanism for conserving  and efficiently using essential nutrients that have been depleted in the mineral  soil (Chapin, 1980, Jordan and Herrera, 1981). </P>     <P align=justify>The simplest explanation for enrichment in metals and loss of  Ca may be topography. NB is at a slightly lower elevation, on a flatter part of  the study area, and thus it is relatively older geologically than the more hilly  areas we sampled to the northwest and the southwest (Grant Goodell, personal  communication). The timeframe for weathering is at least modestly longer in NB.  The relative abundance of metals can increase during the weathering process  through differential loss rates of the elemental constituents of minerals  (Brady, 1990). Over time, more Ca could have been lost from the system through  weathering followed by leaching. It is unclear whether the difference in  geological age is adequate to explain the differences observed. An alternative  explanation is that ancient Mayan land use may have disproportionately and  negatively affected the soils around NB. Ruins are extremely abundant from NB  west to Becan (Turner, 1974). ER is also within the potential realm of influence  of major temple sites, and yet its soils were more fertile than those in NB. The  intensity of recent historic land use seems to be the best explanation for the  difference among sites, but further study is necessary to eliminate the  alternative hypotheses. </P><I>     <P align=justify>Effects of regional environmental gradients on biomass and  nutrient cycling</P></I>     <P align=justify>Differences in total annual precipitation and soil  characteristics may contribute to variation in structure and function among the  study sites <A HREF="#Fig6"> (Figure 6)</A>. To isolate the regional influence on forest processes  from the effects of forest age and cultivation history, mature forests were  examined separately. Forest floor biomass increased with increasing  precipitation <A HREF="#Fig6"> (Figure 6c)</A>. Higher precipitation should enhance decomposition,  leading to lower forest-floor biomass if litter production were to remain  constant. Thus, the observed increase in forest floor biomass suggests a  concomitant increase in litter production. Mean litter production was greater in  the south <A HREF="#Fig6"> (Figure 6b)</A>, but the result was not statistically significant due to  small sample size and high variability in AN. One of the two sites demonstrated  surprisingly low biomass and production. Martínez-Yrizar and Sarukhan (1990)  found higher litter production in the moister of their two study sites in  Chamela, Mexico. Their results support our contention that differences in annual  precipitation may have led to differences in litter production between the  driest and the wettest sites.</P>     <P align=justify>Despite significant differences in rainfall and certain soil  properties, live aboveground biomass did not vary significantly among the  regions <A HREF="#Fig6"> (Figure 6a)</A>. The highest values came from NB, where soils were  apparently less fertile. The lower than expected values in AN may be due to  unquantified impacts of recent logging (see Klepeis and Turner, 2001). Mature  forests in AN had fewer trees (&gt;10cm dbh) and lower basal area than mature  forests in the drier sites, suggesting that some trees may have been extracted  in recent history (Read and Lawrence, in press). On the other hand, high biomass  in NB may be the result of an over-abundance of lianas, perhaps another legacy  of historic disturbance, human or natural (Boose <I>et al</I>, 1994, Gerwing and  Lopes Farias, 2000). The mean contribution of lianas to total biomass was 10.2%  in NB <I>vs</I>. 5.6% in ER and 4.8% in AN (Read and Lawrence, in press).</P>     <P align=justify>Phosphorus, but not nitrogen, dynamics followed trends in  annual precipitation. Total annual inputs of P were greater in the wettest  region, AN <A HREF="#Fig7"> (Figure 7a)</A>, as a result of both greater productivity <A HREF="#Fig6"> (Figure 6b)</A> and  higher P concentrations in the litter (Read and Lawrence, submitted). The  exception to this trend was in NB, where intermediate P inputs would be  expected. Instead, the low relative soil fertility discussed above seems to have  mitigated the effect of added precipitation on P cycling. Nitrogen inputs  increased slightly with increasing precipitation, but the trend was not  significant <A HREF="#Fig7"> (Figure 7b)</A>. This modest trend reflects only differences in total  productivity, as litter nitrogen concentrations did not vary significantly among  regions (Read and Lawrence, submitted). The response of forest P cycling to  regional precipitation gradients and the lack of response in the N cycle suggest  that forests in the SYPR are more limited by P than by N. When water stress was  alleviated, additional P, but not additional N, was introduced into the system.  Thus, the manifestation of nutrient limitation depends upon water availability.  This may explain why Campo <I>et al</I>. (2001) reported that P did not appear  to be limiting in the very dry forests of Chamela, although small amounts of P  were retained in the system. The indication of P limitation in this study came  out of a regional analysis, where more P, but not more N, was observed to cycle  in the wettest region. N cycling appears less sensitive to increased  precipitation than P cycling.</P><I>     <P align=justify>Effects of forest age on biomass and nutrient cycling</P></I>     <P align=justify>As defined by the range of variation induced, forest age had a  greater impact on ecosystem properties and function than did regional  environmental gradients. Across all regions, live aboveground biomass increased  significantly as a function of forest age <A HREF="#Fig8"> (Figure 8a)</A>. There was a pronounced  difference between mature forests and the oldest secondary forests sampled  (12-25 y.o.). Although total woody basal area of stems &gt;1cm dbh had recovered  to 63% of mature forest levels by 25 years, live biomass reached only 40% of  mature forest levels (58 <I>vs</I>. 136 Mg/ha; Read and Lawrence, in press).  Earlier analysis, based on tree basal area only, suggested that basal area  (&gt;10cm dbh) increased to 80% of mature forest levels within 25 years (Turner  <I>et al</I>., 2001). Subsequent analysis of biomass based on all stems  (including lianas and small trees &lt;5cm dbh) suggests a slower rate of  recovery (Read and Lawrence, in press). Our prior analysis depended on the  assumption of a linear increase in biomass beyond 25 years. If biomass growth is  not linear, and the biomass increment declines, for example, by 50% after  forests achieve a closed canopy, then recovery would be slowed further. If we  assume that total canopy closure occurs 25 years following abandonment, instead  of reaching mature forest levels in another 15-35 years, it may take 30-70  years. Thus, our most conservative estimate is 55-95 years for recovery to  current mature forest levels.<A NAME="Fig7"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img9.jpg" width="373" height="139"></P> <FONT size=2>     
<P align=justify><A HREF="#Fig7"> Figure 7</A>. Total annual phosphorus (a) and nitrogen (b) inputs  deposited via fine litter in mature forests of each region. Calculated from  monthly dry mass and monthly litter nutrient concentrations (Read and Lawrence,  submitted). Mean ±SE for all plots within a region.</P></FONT>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>As noted previously, the mature forests of study were logged  for mahogany and Spanish cedar, removing the largest stems. Domination by these  or other large trees might take an additional 10-25 years, assuming an ultimate  density of 6 trees/ha with diameters of 100cm (see Rodríguez Caballero, 1944;  Snook, 1998). Thus, we estimate that forests similar in total aboveground  biomass to those observed in the 19th century (before logging) might be reached  65-120 years after agricultural abandonment. This estimate is more in line with  estimates of recovery time in the wet tropical forests of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico,  which may take 70 years or more to reach biomass equivalent to mature forests  (Hughes <I>et al</I>., 1999).<A NAME="Fig8"> </A> </P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img10.jpg" width="450" height="137"></P><FONT size=2>     
<P align=justify><A HREF="#Fig8"> Figure 8</A>. Aboveground live biomass (&gt;1cm dbh) (a), annual  fine litter production (b), and forest floor biomass (c), as a function of  forest age across all sites. Mean ±SE for all plots within an age class.  Statistically significant differences between age classes indicated by different  letters.<A NAME="Fig9"> </A></P></FONT>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img11.jpg" width="217" height="296"></P>     
<P align=justify>&nbsp;<FONT size=2><A HREF="#Fig9"> Figure 9</A>. Total annual phosphorus (a) and  nitrogen (b) inputs deposited in fine litter as a function of forest age.  Calculated from monthly dry mass and monthly litter nutrient concentrations  (Read and Lawrence, submitted). Mean ±SE for all plots within an age class.  Statistically significant differences between age classes indicated by different  letters.</FONT> </P>     <P align=justify>Both litter production and forest floor biomass increased  consistently with age (Figures <A HREF="#Fig8"> 8b</A>,<A HREF="#Fig8"> 8c</A>). The difference between old secondary and  mature forests was not as dramatic as it was for live biomass. With only 15% of  the aboveground biomass, the youngest forests produced almost 70% as much fine  litter as mature forests. Similar results were reported by Ewel (1976) in  Guatemala. The pattern of high productivity in young forests matches that  observed in successional forests of the temperate zone as well (Odum, 1969). The  increase in forest floor biomass was more rapid than that expected due to the  increase in litter production, suggesting that decomposition slows with forest  age. Experimental studies confirmed that decomposition is slower in older  forests. Lower decomposition rates seemed to occur in response to lower litter  quality rather than to changes in microclimate (Xuluc-Tolosa <I>et al</I>., in  press). In fact, as an indicator of litter quality, litter P concentration  declined as a function of forest age but no significant change in litter N  concentration occurred (data not shown; Read and Lawrence, submitted). </P>     <P align=justify>Whereas P, but not N, responded to increased precipitation,  mean P inputs across all regions did not increase as a function of forest age,  whereas N inputs did so <A HREF="#Fig9"> (Figure 9)</A>. Thus, P cycling changes markedly during the  process of forest recovery, with P use efficiency increasing as a function of  age as suggested by Brown and Lugo (1990). Older forests produced significantly  greater amounts of litter <A HREF="#Fig8"> (Figure 8b)</A>, while cycling the same amount of P as  younger forests <A HREF="#Fig9"> (Figure 9a)</A>, resulting in a decline in litter P concentration  with age (Read and Lawrence, submitted). In contrast, the pool of N cycled  through litter increased in step with increasing litter production in older  forests. Litter N concentration did not increase significantly, although there  was a tendency for slightly higher concentrations in older forests. Taken  together, these data suggest that N-use efficiency declined, if it changed at  all, as a function of forest age. </P>     <P align=justify>Understanding changes in nutrient cycling during forest  recovery depends on the nutrient examined. Furthermore, evaluating nutrient  constraints on ecosystem processes depends on understanding interactions between  water -and nutrient- limitation. When water is broadly limiting (as in the above  analysis of nutrient dynamics as a function of forest age, regardless of  regional precipitation gradients), productivity seems to be limited by N  availability. More N cycling through the system was correlated with higher  litter production. All forests cycled similar amounts of P regardless of age.  This level may represent the maximum P accessible given the soil-climate regime.  P could still be limiting productivity, but we cannot determine the limitation  by simply comparing P return with litter production, as a function of forest  age. Time alone (as a forest ages) will not allow more P to enter the system,  unless fixed biogeochemical constraints are lifted. Although the potential  exists for N uptake through biological fixation, there are no additional pools  to tap to alleviate P limitation. Increasing production depends, then, on  increasing nitrogen availability as the forest and its soils recover from  cultivation. When water limitation is alleviated and soil biological activity is  enhanced (as it appears to be in AN), certain biogeochemical constraints on P  cycling do seem to be lifted. Only then, can additional P enter the system (see  Figures <A HREF="#Fig6"> 6</A> and <A HREF="#Fig7"> 7</A>). This P apparently yielded gains in litter production in AN,  suggesting that P becomes limiting to productivity when water is no longer the  primary limiting factor.<A NAME="TabIII"> </A></P>     <P align=center><IMG  border=0 src="/img/fbpe/inci/v27n8/v27n8a3img12.jpg" width="650" height="722"></P>     
<P align=justify>Changes in soil properties with forest age suggest that N  availability may increase during forest regeneration. Although data on the N and  P content of soils are lacking, soil organic matter did increase significantly  with age <A HREF="#TabIII"> (Table III)</A>. In the top 15cm of soil, organic matter increased from  10-11% in young secondary forests to 15% in mature forests. An increase in N  availability associated with an increase in organic matter would allow litter  concentrations to remain stable while productivity increases. This increase in  soil organic matter probably represents a slowing of mineralization rates in the  soil along with a demonstrated increase in litter inputs. Likewise, we  attributed the increase in forest floor mass with age to added inputs and slowed  decomposition. Data on K concentrations support this interpretation: K  concentration was lowest in mature forest soils, where turnover rates of organic  matter are expected to be slowest due to a decline in litter quality.</P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align=justify>Surprisingly, both decomposition experiments (Xuluc-Tolosa  <I>et al</I>., in press) and field observations suggest that P may limit changes  in decomposition and mineralization with forest age, although N appears to limit  plant productivity when water is broadly limiting. P may also limit N fixation.  This effect has been suggested in other studies (e.g. Crews <I>et al</I>., 2000,  Uliassi <I>et al</I>., 2000). With the potential to constrain decomposition,  mineralization, and N fixation, P may play a critical role in limiting N  availability to recovering vegetation (Ewel, 1986). It is important to emphasize  the difficulty in identifying either P or N as the limiting nutrient in this  system, especially if P mediates N limitation. Both nutrients appear to limit  key ecosystem processes.</P><I>     <P align=justify>Implications</P></I>     <P align=justify>The study of nutrient dynamics in the region provided important  clues about the regenerative capacity of the forests. Any assessment of land use  and land cover change must take into account several critical points. Regional  precipitation gradients strongly influenced nutrient cycling through soil  organic matter and litter, but had a more limited effect on plant productivity  and biomass. Increased precipitation allowed additional phosphorus to enter the  system. Although forest age profoundly influenced many aspects of nutrient  cycling, its greatest effect was to alter litter production and aboveground  biomass. P use efficiency tended to increase and N use efficiency tended to  decrease slightly with age. Water limitation seems to be the predominant  environmental factor limiting ecosystem processes in these dry forests, and  phosphorus may be the most significant limiting nutrient.</P>     <P align=justify>Sampling along natural and human-made gradients has allowed the  evaluation of broad environmental and stand-level drivers of ecosystem  processes. Environmental factors do constrain litter production, forest floor  mass, and soil organic matter in mature forest. However, to understand  differences in the biomass of mature forests, further information about the  human history of the area is critical, including logging history and decisions  about what areas have purposefully been left untouched (perhaps the upper  slopes). Structure and function in secondary forests (biomass, litter  production, forest floor mass and critical soil properties) are strongly  influenced by the age of the stand. The presence of humans on the landscape  results in changes that are greater than those induced by natural, environmental  variation at the regional scale. For the best understanding of these landscapes,  and for scaling up from case studies to regional and global assessments,  integrating human impacts on ecosystem processes is vital.</P>     <P align=justify>Efforts to use remotely sensed data to scale up from point  samples to regional values will depend critically on the ability to distinguish  young and old secondary forest. Models that predict landscape-scale carbon  stocks, for example, will be extremely sensitive to the mapping of field-derived  age categories onto image-derived land cover classes (e.g. Cairns <I>et al</I>,  2000). On the other hand, distinguishing older secondary forest and mature  forests will be less critical for determining regional productivity, given the  similarity in litter production. The amount of classification error that can be  safely tolerated thus depends on the goal of the model: carbon stocks or carbon  fluxes. Our studies of nutrient cycling suggest that similar considerations must  be made when trying to model other biogeochemical cycles at the regional  scale.</P><B>     <P align=center>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</P></B>     <P align=justify>The authors thank the farmers of El Refugio, Nicolás Bravo, and  Arroyo Negro who worked with them; Juan Méndez-Díaz for essential assistance and  leadership in the field; numerous students for excellent help in the field and  the lab: Fausto Bolom, Jakara Hubbard, Larissa Read, Jessica Sisco, Heidi  Wasson, and Tana Wood; and Pedro Macario Mendoza of ECOSUR for logistical  support. Funding was provided by NSF, NASA, The Mellon Foundation, Carnegie  Mellon University, and the University of Virginia.</P><B>     <P align=center>&nbsp;</P>     <P align=center>REFERENCES</P></B>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P> <DIR>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><P align=justify>1. Brady NC (1990) <I>The Nature and Properties of Soils</I>.  Tenth Edition. MacMillan. New York. 621 pp.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953505&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>2. Boose ER, Foster DR, Fluet M (1994) Hurricane impacts to  tropical and temperate forest landscapes. <I>Ecological Monographs</I>  <I>64</I>: 369-400.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953506&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>3. Brown S, Lugo AE (1990) Tropical secondary forests. <I>J.  Tropical Ecol. 6</I>: 1-32.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953507&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>4. Buschbacher R, Uhl C, Serrão EAS (1988) Abandoned pastures  in eastern Amazonia. II: Nutrient stocks in the soil and vegetation. <I>J. Ecol.  76</I>: 682-699.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953508&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>5. Cairns MA, Haggerty PK, Álvarez R, DeJong BHJ, Olmsted I  (2000) Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: A region’s contribution to the  global carbon cycle. <I>Ecological Applications 10</I>: 1426-1441.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953509&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>6. Campo J, Jaramillo VJ, Maass JM (1998) Pulses of soil  phosphorus availability in a Mexican tropical dry forest: effects of seasonality  and level of wetting. <I>Oecologia 115</I>: 167-172.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953510&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>7. Campo J, Maass JM, Jaramillo VJ, Martínez-Yrizar A, Sarukhan  J (2001) Phosphorus cycling in a Mexican tropical dry forest ecosystem.  <I>Biogeochemistry 53</I>: 161-179.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953511&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>8. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants<I>.  Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics 11</I>: 233-260.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953512&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>9. Crews TE, Farrington H, Vitousek PM (2000) Changes in  asymbiotic, heterotrophic nitrogen fixation on leaf litter of Metrosideros  polymorpha with long-term ecosystem development in Hawaii. <I>Ecosystems 3</I>:  386-395.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953513&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>10. Ewel JJ (1976) Litter fall and leaf decomposition in a  tropical forest succession in eastern Guatemala. <I>J. Ecol. 64</I>:  293-307.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953514&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>11. Ewel JJ (1986) Designing agricultural systems for the humid  tropics. <I>Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics 17</I>: 245-271.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953515&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>12. Fernandes DN, Sanford RL (1995) Effects of recent land-use  practices on soil nutrients and succession under tropical wet forest in Costa  Rica. <I>Conservation Biol. 9</I>: 915-922.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953516&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>13. Geoghegan J, Cortina Villar S, Klepeis P, Macario Mendoza  P, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y, Roy Chowdhury R, Turner BL II, Vance C (2001) Modeling  Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatan Peninsular Region: Comparing  Survey and Satellite Data<I>. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 84</I>:  25-46.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953517&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>14. Gerwing JH, Lopes Farias D (2000) Integrating liana  abundance and forest stature into an estimate of total aboveground biomass for  an eastern Amazonian forest<I>. J. Tropical Ecol. 16</I>: 237-335.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953518&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>15. Holbrook NM, Whitbeck JL, Mooney HA (1995) Drought  responses of neotropical dry forest trees. In Bullock SH, Mooney HA, and Medina  E (Eds.) <I>Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests</I>. Cambridge University Press.  Cambridge. pp. 243-276.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953519&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>16. Hughes RF, Kauffman JB, Jaramillo VJ (1999) Biomass,  carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of  Mexico. <I>Ecology 80</I>: 1892-1907.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953520&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>17. Jordan CF, Herrera R (1981) Tropical rain forests: are  nutrients really critical? <I>The American Naturalist 117</I>: 167-180.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953521&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>18. Killingbeck KT (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to  the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. <I>Ecology  77</I>: 1716-1729.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953522&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>19. Klepeis P, Turner II BL (2001) Integrated Land History and  Global Change Science: The Example of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region  project. <I>Land Use Policy 18</I>: 27-39.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953523&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>20. Kunkel Westphal I, Kunkel P (1979) Litter fall in a  Guatemalan primary forest, with details of leaf-shedding by some common tree  species. <I>J. Ecol. 67</I>: 665-686.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953524&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>21. Martínez-Yrizar A, Sarukhan J (1990) Litterfall patterns in  a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico over a five-year period. <I>J. Tropical  Ecol. 6</I>: 433-444.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953525&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>22. Martínez-Yrizar A, Sarukhan J, Pérez-Jiménez E, Rincón E,  Maass JM, Solís-Magallanes A, Cervantes L (1992) Above-ground phytomass of a  tropical deciduous forest on the coast of Jalisco, Mexico. <I>J. Tropical Ecol.  8</I>: 87-96.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953526&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>23. McGrath DA, Comerford NB, Duryea ML (2001) Litter dynamics  and monthly fluctuations in soil phosphorus availability in an Amazonian  agroforest. <I>Forest Ecol. Management 131</I>: 167-181.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953527&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>24. Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forest.  <I>Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics 17</I>: 67-88.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953528&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>25. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development.  <I>Science 164</I>: 262-270.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953529&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>26. Proctor J, Anderson JM, Fogden SCL, Vallack HW (1983)  Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu  National Park, Sarawak. <I>J. Ecol. 71</I>: 261-283.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953530&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>27. Read L, Lawrence D (in press) Recovery of biomass following  shifting cultivation in dry tropical forests of the Yucatan. <I>Ecological  Applications.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953531&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>28. Read L, Lawrence D (Submitted) Litter nutrient dynamics in  secondary dry tropical forests.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953532&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>29. Reich PB, Borchert R (1984) Water stress and tree phenology  in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. <I>J. Ecol. 72</I>:  61-74.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953533&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>30. Rodríguez Caballero R (1944) <I>La Explotación de los  Montes de Caoba en el Territorio de Quintana Roo</I>. Ingeniero Agrónomo.  México, D.F. Chapingo. 120 pp.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953534&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>31. Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC (1989)  Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and  savanna. <I>Nature 338</I>: 499-500.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953535&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>32. Snook LK (1998) Sustaining harvests of mahogany (Swietenia  macrophylla King) from Mexico’s Yucatan forests: Past, present, and future. In  Primack RB, Bray D, Galletti HA, Paciano I (Eds.) <I>Timber, Tourists, and  Temples: Conservation and Development in the Maya Forest of Belize, Guatemala,  and Mexico</I>. Island Press. Washington, D.C. pp. 61-80.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953536&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>33. Suazo I (1998) <I>Aspectos ecológicos de la especie  invasora Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn en una selva húmeda de la región de  Chajul, Chiapas, México</I>. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.  México. 114 pp.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953537&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>34. Swift MJ, Russell-Smith A, Perfect TJ (1981) Decomposition  and mineral nutrient dynamics of plant litter in a regenerating bush-fallow in  the sub-humid tropics. <I>J. Ecol. 69</I>: 981-995.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953538&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>35. Trejo I, Dirzo R (2000) Deforestation of seasonally dry  tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. <I>Biological  Conservation 94</I>: 133-142.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953539&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>36.Turner BL II (1974) Prehistoric intensive agriculture in the  Mayan lowlands. <I>Science 185</I>: 118-124.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953540&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>37. Turner BL II, Cortina Villar S, Foster D, Geoghegan J, Keys  E, Klepeis P, Lawrence D, Macario Mendoza P, Manson S, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y,  Pérez Salicrup D, Roy Chowdhury R, Savitsky B, Schneider L, Schmook B, Vance C  (2001) Deforestation and Agricultural Change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular  Region: Integrative Land Change for Global Change Studies. <I>Forest Ecol.  Management 154</I>: 353-370.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953541&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>38. Uliassi DD, Huss-Danell K, Ruess RW, Doran K (2000) Biomass  allocation and nitrogenase activity in Alnus tenuifolia: responses to  successional soil type and phosphorus availability. <I>Ecoscience 7</I>:  73-79.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953542&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>39. Vitousek P (1984) Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and  nutrient limitation in tropical forests. <I>Ecology 65</I>: 285-298.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953543&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300039&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>40. Wieder RK, Wright SJ (1995) Tropical forest litter dynamics  and dry season irrigation on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. <I>Ecology 76</I>:  1971-1979.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953544&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300040&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>41. Whigham DF, Zugasty Towle P, Cabrera Cano E, O’Neill J, Ley  E (1990) The effect of annual variation in precipitation on growth and litter  production in a tropical dry forest in the Yucatan of Mexico. <I>J. Tropical  Ecol. 31</I>: 23-34.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953545&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300041&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align=justify>42. Xuluc-Tolosa FJ, Vester HFM, Ramírez-Marcial N,  Castellanos-Albores J, Lawrence D (in press) Leaf litter decomposition of tree  species in three successional phases of tropical dry secondary forest in  Campeche, Mexico<I>. Forest Ecol. Management.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=953546&pid=S0378-1844200200080000300042&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P align=justify>&nbsp;</P><B>     <P align=justify>&nbsp;</P></B>     <P>&nbsp;</P></DIR>     ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brady]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Nature and Properties of Soils]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<edition>Tenth</edition>
<page-range>621</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MacMillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boose]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ER]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fluet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Monographs]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>369-400</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lugo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical secondary forests]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Tropical Ecol]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>1-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buschbacher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uhl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serrão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EAS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia: II: Nutrient stocks in the soil and vegetation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Ecol]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>76</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cairns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haggerty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Álvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeJong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BHJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olmsted]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: A region’s contribution to the global carbon cycle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Applications]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>1426-1441</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaramillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pulses of soil phosphorus availability in a Mexican tropical dry forest: effects of seasonality and level of wetting]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<page-range>167-172</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaramillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Yrizar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarukhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phosphorus cycling in a Mexican tropical dry forest ecosystem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biogeochemistry]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>161-179</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chapin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The mineral nutrition of wild plants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>233-260</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crews]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farrington]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vitousek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Changes in asymbiotic, heterotrophic nitrogen fixation on leaf litter of Metrosideros polymorpha with long-term ecosystem development in Hawaii]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecosystems]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>386-395</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ewel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Litter fall and leaf decomposition in a tropical forest succession in eastern Guatemala]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<page-range>J. Ecol. 64: 293-307</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ewel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Designing agricultural systems for the humid tropics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>245-271</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of recent land-use practices on soil nutrients and succession under tropical wet forest in Costa Rica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Conservation Biol]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>915-922</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geoghegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cortina Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klepeis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macario Mendoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ogneva-Himmelberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roy Chowdhury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BL II]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vance]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Modeling Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatan Peninsular Region: Comparing Survey and Satellite Data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<page-range>25-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopes Farias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Integrating liana abundance and forest stature into an estimate of total aboveground biomass for an eastern Amazonian forest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Tropical Ecol]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>237-335</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bullock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mooney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>243-276</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hughes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kauffman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaramillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biomass, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<page-range>1892-1907</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jordan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical rain forests: are nutrients really critical?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Naturalist]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>167-180</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Killingbeck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KT]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>1716-1729</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klepeis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[II BL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Integrated Land History and Global Change Science: The Example of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region project]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Land Use Policy]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>27-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kunkel Westphal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kunkel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Litter fall in a Guatemalan primary forest, with details of leaf-shedding by some common tree species]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Ecol]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>665-686</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Yrizar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarukhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Litterfall patterns in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico over a five-year period]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Tropical Ecol]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>433-444</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Yrizar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarukhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez-Jiménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rincón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solís-Magallanes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cervantes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Above-ground phytomass of a tropical deciduous forest on the coast of Jalisco, Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Tropical Ecol]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>87-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGrath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comerford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duryea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Litter dynamics and monthly fluctuations in soil phosphorus availability in an Amazonian agroforest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecol. Management]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>131</volume>
<page-range>167-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murphy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lugo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecology of tropical dry forest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Rev. Ecol. Systematics]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>67-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The strategy of ecosystem development]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>164</volume>
<page-range>262-270</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Proctor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fogden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SCL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vallack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Ecol]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<page-range>261-283</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Read]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Recovery of biomass following shifting cultivation in dry tropical forests of the Yucatan]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ecological Applications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Read]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Litter nutrient dynamics in secondary dry tropical forests]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borchert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Ecol]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>61-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Caballero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La Explotación de los Montes de Caoba en el Territorio de Quintana Roo]]></source>
<year>1944</year>
<page-range>120</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México, D.F ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Chapingo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raghubanshi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srivastava]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>338</volume>
<page-range>499-500</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Primack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bray]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galletti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paciano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Timber, Tourists, and Temples: Conservation and Development in the Maya Forest of Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>61-80</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington, D.C ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Island Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suazo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aspectos ecológicos de la especie invasora Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn en una selva húmeda de la región de Chajul, Chiapas, México]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>114</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swift]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Russell-Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perfect]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Decomposition and mineral nutrient dynamics of plant litter in a regenerating bush-fallow in the sub-humid tropics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Ecol]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>981-995</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trejo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dirzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biological Conservation]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<page-range>133-142</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BL II]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prehistoric intensive agriculture in the Mayan lowlands]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>185</volume>
<page-range>118-124</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BL II]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cortina Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geoghegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keys]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klepeis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macario Mendoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ogneva-Himmelberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Salicrup]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roy Chowdhury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Savitsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schneider]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schmook]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vance]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Deforestation and Agricultural Change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region: Integrative Land Change for Global Change Studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecol. Management]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>154</volume>
<page-range>353-370</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uliassi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huss-Danell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruess]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biomass allocation and nitrogenase activity in Alnus tenuifolia: responses to successional soil type and phosphorus availability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecoscience]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>73-79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vitousek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>285-298</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wieder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical forest litter dynamics and dry season irrigation on Barro Colorado Island, Panama]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<page-range>1971-1979</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whigham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zugasty Towle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrera Cano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O’Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effect of annual variation in precipitation on growth and litter production in a tropical dry forest in the Yucatan of Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Tropical Ecol]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>23-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xuluc-Tolosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vester]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HFM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramírez-Marcial]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castellanos-Albores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Leaf litter decomposition of tree species in three successional phases of tropical dry secondary forest in Campeche, Mexico]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Forest Ecol. Management.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
