<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0378-1844</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Interciencia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[INCI]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0378-1844</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASOCIACIÓN INTERCIENCIA]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0378-18442007000500011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of solid substrate fermentation on the nutritional quality of agro-industrial residues]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Efecto de la fermentación en medio sólido sobre la calidad nutricional de residuos agroindustriales]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[EFEITO DA FERMENTAÇÃO EM SUBSTRATO SÓLIDO SOBRE A QUALIDADE NUTRICIONAL DE RESÍDUOS AGROINDUSTRIAIS]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortiz-Tovar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guadalupe]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Javier]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cerrillo-Soto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Andrea]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juárez-Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Arturo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Favela-Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto-Cruz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Oscar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Teconológico de Durango (ITD)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) Unidad Iztapalapa ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2007</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2007</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<fpage>339</fpage>
<lpage>343</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0378-18442007000500011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0378-18442007000500011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0378-18442007000500011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This study was performed to evaluate the chemical composition and in vitro gas production of five agro-industrial residues, with and without treatment, using solid substrate fermentation. Oat straw, bean straw, corn stubble, apple pomace and agave bagasse were treated using two filamentous fungi, Trichoderma harzianum and Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. Chemical analyses (crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose) were carried out. Calibrated glass syringes were used for in vitro gas production determinations and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile was obtained by gas chromatography. In vitro data were fitted using the equations p=a+b(1-e-ct) by Ørskov and McDonald and G=A/(1+[B/t]) by France et al (2000). Increases in CP content (P<0.05) were registered by treating oat straw (20%), bean straw (83%) and corn stubble (16%) with P. chrysosporium. Contents of NDF were reduced by 9.5% in oat straw by treatments (P<0.05). Regarding gas production parameters, the b value in agave bagasse (57.4%) and gas production rate constant c (7.5%) were higher (P<0.05) in the substrate treated with P. chrysosporium related to other treatments. Similarly, higher values for the A parameter were registered in maize straw (+22%) and agave bagasse (+13%) treated with P. chrysosporium. In spite of these isolated differences, the analysis performed showed that the chemical composition, mainly structural carbohydrates, were not modified under the conditions of this study.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la composición química y la producción de gas in vitro de cinco residuos agro-industriales, antes y después de aplicar un proceso de fermentación en medio sólido. Paja de avena, paja de haba, rastrojo de maíz, bagaso de manzana y bagaso de agave fueron tratados usando dos hongos filamentosos, Trichoderma harzianum y Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. Los análisis químicos realizados fueron: determinación de proteína cruda, fibra detergente neutro, fibra detergente ácido, lignina, celulosa y hemicelulosa. Para la determinación de la producción de gas in vitro se utilizaron jeringuas de cristal calibradas, mientras que el perfil de ácidos grasos volátiles (AGV’s) fue obtenido por cromatografía de gases. Los datos de producción de gas in vitro fueron ajustados usando las ecuaciones p=a+b(1-e-ct) propuesta por Ørskov y McDonald y G=A/(1+[B/t]) propuesta por France et al (2000). Se observaron aumentos en el contenido de proteína cruda (P<0,05) al tratar paja de avena (20%), paja de haba (83%) y rastrojo de maíz (16%) con P. chrysosporium. El contenido de fibra detergente neutro fue reducido un 9,5% en paja de avena por los tratamientos (P<0,05). Con respecto a los parámetros de la producción del gas, los valores de b y c en bagaso de agave fueron mayores (57,4% y 7,5%, respectivamente) en el substrato tratado con P. chrysosporium en relación con otros tratamientos. De manera similar, valores más altos para el parámetro de A fueron observados en rastrojo de maíz (+22%) y bagaso de agave (+13%) tratados con P. chrysosporium. A pesar de estas diferencias aisladas, el análisis realizado demostró que la composición química, principalmente carbohidratos estructurales, no fue modificada bajo las condiciones de este estudio.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a composição química e a produção de gás in vitro de cinco resíduos agroindustriais, antes e depois de aplicar um processo de fermentação em meio sólido. Palha de aveia, palha de fava, resíduos de milho, bagaço de maça e bagaço de agave foram tratados usando dois fungos filamentosos, Trichoderma harzianum e Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. As análises químicas realizados foram: determinação de proteína crua, fibra detergente neutro, fibra detergente ácido, lignina, celulosa e hemicelulose. Para a determinação da produção de gás in vitro se utilizaram seringas de cristal calibradas, enquanto que o perfil de ácidos grassos voláteis (AGV’s) foi obtido por cromatografia de gases. Os dados de produção de gás in vitro foram ajustados usando as equações p=a+b(1-e-ct) proposta por Ørskov e McDonald e G=A/(1+[B/t]) proposta por France et al. Se observaram aumentos no conteúdo de proteína crua (P<0,05) ao tratar palha de aveia (20%), palha de fava (83%) e resíduos de milho (16%) com P. chrysosporium. O conteúdo de fibra detergente neutro foi reduzido um 9,5% em palha de aveia pelos tratamentos (P<0,05). Com respeito aos parâmetros da produção do gás, os valores de b e c em bagaço de agave foram maiores (57,4% e 7,5%, respectivamente) no substrato tratado com P. chrysosporium em relação com outros tratamentos. De maneira similar, valores mais altos para o parâmetro de A foram observados em resíduos de milho (+22%) e bagaço de agave (+13%) tratados com P. chrysosporium. Apesar destas diferenças isoladas, a análise realizada demonstrou que a composição química, principalmente carboidratos estruturais, não foi modificada sob as condições deste estudo.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[In Vitro Gas Production]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Phanaerochaete chrysosporium]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Trichoderma harzianum]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <B>    <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="3">EFFECT OF SOLID SUBSTRATE FERMENTATION ON THE NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF AGRO-INDUSTRIAL RESIDUES</font></P>     <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Guadalupe Ortiz-Tovar, Javier L&oacute;pez-Miranda, Mar&iacute;a Andrea Cerrillo-Soto,</font> </P>     <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Arturo Ju&aacute;rez-Reyes, Ernesto Favela-Torres and Oscar Soto-Cruz</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mar&iacute;a Guadalupe Ortiz-Tovar</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. M.Sc. in Biochemical Engineering, Instituto Teconol&oacute;gico de Durango (ITD), Mexico. Manager, Agrana Fruit de Mexico.</font></P> <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Javier L&oacute;pez-Miranda</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. M.Sc. in Food Engineering, ITD, Mexico. Professor, ITD, Mexico.</font></P> <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mar&iacute;a Andrea Cerrillo-Soto</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Ph.D. in Animal Nutrition, Iowa State University, USA. Professor, Universidad Ju&aacute;rez del Estado de Durango (UJED), Mexico.</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Arturo Sa&uacute;l Ju&aacute;rez-Reyes. Ph.D., Universit&eacute; Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, France. Professor, UJED, Mexico.</font></P> <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Ernesto Favela-Torres</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Ph.D., Universit&eacute; de Provence, France. Professor, Universidad Aut&oacute;noma Metropolitana (UAM), Unidad Iztapalapa, Mexico.</font></P> <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Nicol&aacute;s Oscar Soto-Cruz</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Doctor in Biotechnology, UAM, Mexico. Professor, ITD, Mexico. Address: Blvd. Felipe Pescador 1830 Ote., Col. Nueva Vizcaya, 34080, Durango, Dgo., Mexico. e-mail: soto@itdposgrado-bioquimica.com.mx</font> </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>SUMMARY</b></font></P>      <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">This study was performed to evaluate the chemical composition and in vitro gas production of five agro-industrial residues, with and without treatment, using solid substrate fermentation. Oat straw, bean straw, corn stubble, apple pomace and agave bagasse were treated using two filamentous fungi,<B> </B>Trichoderma harzianum and Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. Chemical analyses (crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose) were carried out. Calibrated glass syringes were used for in vitro gas production determinations and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile was obtained by gas chromatography. In vitro data were fitted using the equations p=a+b(1-e<SUP>-ct</SUP>) by &Oslash;rskov and McDonald and G=A/(1+[B/t]) by France et al (2000). Increases in CP content (P&lt;0.05) were registered by treating oat straw (20%), bean straw (83%) and corn stubble (16%) with P. chrysosporium. Contents of NDF were reduced by 9.5% in oat straw by treatments (P&lt;0.05). Regarding gas production parameters, the b value in agave bagasse (57.4%) and gas production rate constant c (7.5%) were higher (P&lt;0.05) in the substrate treated with P. chrysosporium related to other treatments. Similarly, higher values for the A parameter were registered in maize straw (+22%) and agave bagasse (+13%) treated with P. chrysosporium. In spite of these isolated differences, the analysis performed showed that the chemical composition, mainly structural carbohydrates, were not modified under the conditions of this study.</font></P> <B>     <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="3">EFECTO DE LA FERMENTACI&Oacute;N EN MEDIO S&Oacute;LIDO SOBRE LA CALIDAD NUTRICIONAL DE RESIDUOS AGROINDUSTRIALES</font></B> </P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMEN</b></font></P>      <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la composici&oacute;n qu&iacute;mica y la producci&oacute;n de gas in vitro de cinco residuos agro-industriales, antes y despu&eacute;s de aplicar un proceso de fermentaci&oacute;n en medio s&oacute;lido. Paja de avena, paja de haba, rastrojo de ma&iacute;z, bagaso de manzana y bagaso de agave fueron tratados usando dos hongos filamentosos, Trichoderma harzianum y Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. Los an&aacute;lisis qu&iacute;micos realizados fueron: determinaci&oacute;n de prote&iacute;na cruda, fibra detergente neutro, fibra detergente &aacute;cido, lignina, celulosa y hemicelulosa. Para la determinaci&oacute;n de la producci&oacute;n de gas in vitro se utilizaron jeringuas de cristal calibradas, mientras que el perfil de &aacute;cidos grasos vol&aacute;tiles (AGV’s) fue obtenido por cromatograf&iacute;a de gases. Los datos de producci&oacute;n de gas in vitro fueron ajustados usando las ecuaciones p=a+b(1-e<SUP>-ct</SUP>) propuesta por &Oslash;rskov y McDonald y G=A/(1+[B/t]) propuesta por France et al (2000). Se observaron aumentos en el contenido de prote&iacute;na cruda (P&lt;0,05) al tratar paja de avena (20%), paja de haba (83%) y rastrojo de ma&iacute;z (16%) con P. chrysosporium. El contenido de fibra detergente neutro fue reducido un 9,5% en paja de avena por los tratamientos (P&lt;0,05). Con respecto a los par&aacute;metros de la producci&oacute;n del gas, los valores de b y c en bagaso de agave fueron mayores (57,4% y 7,5%, respectivamente) en el substrato tratado con P. chrysosporium en relaci&oacute;n con otros tratamientos. De manera similar, valores m&aacute;s altos para el par&aacute;metro de A fueron observados en rastrojo de ma&iacute;z (+22%) y bagaso de agave (+13%) tratados con P. chrysosporium. A pesar de estas diferencias aisladas, el an&aacute;lisis realizado demostr&oacute; que la composici&oacute;n qu&iacute;mica, principalmente carbohidratos estructurales, no fue modificada bajo las condiciones de este estudio.</font></P>  <B>    <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="3">EFEITO DA FERMENTA&Ccedil;&Atilde;O EM SUBSTRATO S&Oacute;LIDO SOBRE A QUALIDADE NUTRICIONAL DE RES&Iacute;DUOS AGROINDUSTRIAIS</font></P> </B>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMO</b></font></P>      <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a composi&ccedil;&atilde;o qu&iacute;mica e a produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de g&aacute;s in vitro de cinco res&iacute;duos agroindustriais, antes e depois de aplicar um processo de fermenta&ccedil;&atilde;o em meio s&oacute;lido. Palha de aveia, palha de fava, res&iacute;duos de milho, baga&ccedil;o de ma&ccedil;a e baga&ccedil;o de agave foram tratados usando dois fungos filamentosos, Trichoderma harzianum e Phanaerochaete chrysosporium. As an&aacute;lises qu&iacute;micas realizados foram: determina&ccedil;&atilde;o de prote&iacute;na crua, fibra detergente neutro, fibra detergente &aacute;cido, lignina, celulosa e hemicelulose. Para a determina&ccedil;&atilde;o da produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de g&aacute;s in vitro se utilizaram seringas de cristal calibradas, enquanto que o perfil de &aacute;cidos grassos vol&aacute;teis (AGV’s) foi obtido por cromatografia de gases. Os dados de produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de g&aacute;s in vitro foram ajustados usando as equa&ccedil;&otilde;es p=a+b(1-e<SUP>-ct</SUP>) proposta por &Oslash;rskov e McDonald e G=A/(1+[B/t]) proposta por France et al. Se observaram aumentos no conte&uacute;do de prote&iacute;na crua (P&lt;0,05) ao tratar palha de aveia (20%), palha de fava (83%) e res&iacute;duos de milho (16%) com P. chrysosporium. O conte&uacute;do de fibra detergente neutro foi reduzido um 9,5% em palha de aveia pelos tratamentos (P&lt;0,05). Com respeito aos par&acirc;metros da produ&ccedil;&atilde;o do g&aacute;s, os valores de b e c em baga&ccedil;o de agave foram maiores (57,4% e 7,5%, respectivamente) no substrato tratado com P. chrysosporium em rela&ccedil;&atilde;o com outros tratamentos. De maneira similar, valores mais altos para o par&acirc;metro de A foram observados em res&iacute;duos de milho (+22%) e baga&ccedil;o de agave (+13%) tratados com P. chrysosporium. Apesar destas diferen&ccedil;as isoladas, a an&aacute;lise realizada demonstrou que a composi&ccedil;&atilde;o qu&iacute;mica, principalmente carboidratos estruturais, n&atilde;o foi modificada sob as condi&ccedil;&otilde;es deste estudo.</font></P>  <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">KEYWORDS </font> </B><font face="Verdana" size="2"> / In Vitro Gas Production / <I>Phanaerochaete chrysosporium</I> / <I>Trichoderma harzianum</I> /</font> </P> <FONT SIZE=2>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Received:</b> 09/26/2006. <b> Modified:</b> 03/22/2007. <b> Accepted:</b> 03/28/2007.</font></P> </FONT> <B>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Introduction</font></P> </B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">More than 60 million tons of oat straw, bean straw, maize straw, apple pomace and agave bagasse are produced in Mexico annually, being the main agro-industrial residues produced in the country (Soto-Cruz, 2003). The main components of agro-industrial residues (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) are complex and its biodegradability is low, due to their resistance to degradation by ruminal microorganisms (Jarrige <I>et al</I>., 1995). Nevertheless, biotechnology could offer opportunities to modify the chemical structure of these substrates and to improve their digestion. Some efforts have been made to apply biotechnological processes to the improvement of the nutritious quality of agro-industrial residues like ruminant feed. Villas-Boas <I>et al</I>. (2003) treated apple pomace using <I>Candida utilis</I> in submerged culture, followed by <I>Pleurotus ostreatus</I> in solid substrate fermentation (SSF). They found that after <I>C. utilis</I> fermentation, protein and mineral content increased 100 and 60%, respectively, accompanied by an 8.2% increase in digestibility, while sequential fermentation with <I>C. utilis</I> and <I>P. ostreatus</I> achieved a high protein level with 500% of crude protein enrichment after 60 days of fermentation, as well as a considerable increase in the mineral content. Bauer <I>et al</I>. (2003) evaluated the effect of enzymatic treatments on several substrates rich in carbohydrates, showing that the fermentabilities of the enzyme-treated and untreated substrates were different. Thus, the utilization of SSF, which requires sophisticated technology and is of low cost (Ghiydal <I>et al.</I>, 1992) offers the potential of improving the nutritional value of agro-industrial residues. SSF has been defined as the growth of the micro-organisms on (moist) solid material in absence or near-absence of free water (Pandey, 2003). Under these conditions, the favored microorganisms are filamentous fungi, due to its capacity to grow in media with low water activity (Cannel and Moo-Young, 1980).</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">On the other hand, <I>in vivo</I> evaluation of feed quality is expensive and laborious. Thus, simple and economical techniques are desirable (Stern <I>et al</I>., 1997), like <I>in vitro </I>gas production (Williams, 2000), which is used to determine the fermentation kinetics of cereal straws, cereal grains (Opatpatanakit <I>et al</I>., 1994) and other feed (Bl&uuml;mmel y Becker, 1997; Getachew <I>et al</I>., 2004). Moreover, the gas produced during <I>in vitro</I> incubation can be related to production of short chain VFA (Getachew <I>et al</I>., 2002), which are the main energy source for ruminants. This technique has not been used to study the quality of roughages treated by solid substrate fermentation.</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of SSF on the nutritional quality of agro-industrial residues, through chemical analysis, gas production and VFA production <I>in vitro</I>.</font></P> <B>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Materials and Methods</font></P> </B><I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Substrates</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Agricultural residues comprising oat straw, bean straw, maize straw, apple pomace and agave bagasse were used as substrates. All the substrates were milled through a 1mm screen and stored in sealed plastic containers for further analyses.</font></P> <I>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Microorganisms</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Two strains of filamentous fungi (<I>Trichoderma harzianum</I> and <I>Phanaerochaete chrysosporium</I>), obtained from the collection of the Universidad Aut&oacute;noma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa were used. The strains were stored at 4°C in plates with potato dextrose agar (PDA).</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Inoculum production</font></P> </I>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Strains were grown in PDA at 30°C, during seven days. After incubation, 30ml of Tween 80 (0.05% v/v) were added to suspend the spores. A microscopic quantification was made using a Neubauer camera to determine the concentration of spores in the suspension.</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Solid substrate fermentation</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Fermentation was carried out in duplicate using 250ml Erlenmeyer flasks and 4g of the residue. A solution containing (per liter) 0.3g urea, 1.4g (NH<SUB>4</SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB>SO<SUB>4,</SUB> 2.0g KH<SUB>2</SUB>PO<SUB>4</SUB>, 0.4g CaCl<SUB>2</SUB>·2H<SUB>2</SUB>O, 0.3g MgSO<SUB>4</SUB>·7H<SUB>2</SUB>O, 0.75g casein peptone, 0.25g yeast extract, 5mg FeSO<SUB>4</SUB>·7H<SUB>2</SUB>O, 1.6mg MnSO<SUB>4</SUB>·4H<SUB>2</SUB>O, 1.4mg ZnSO<SUB>4</SUB>·7H<SUB>2</SUB>O, and 20mg CoCl<SUB>2</SUB>·6H<SUB>2</SUB>O was added to obtain a humidity of 38%. Flasks were sterilized at 120°C during 15min. As soon as flasks reached room temperature, they were inoculated (final humidity of 75%) to provide the following concentrations (spores/g DM) in three treatments: 1) 2×10<SUP>7</SUP> spores/g of<I> T. harzianum</I>, 2) 2×10<SUP>7</SUP> spores/g of <I>P. chrysosporium</I>, and 3) 1×10<SUP>7</SUP> spores/g of each of the two fungi. After inoculation, all the flasks were incubated for 7 days at 30ºC.</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Chemical analysis</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Crude protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 1995). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin were determined according to Van Soest <I>et al</I>. (1991). Hemicellulose was calculated as (NDF-ADF) and cellulose as (ADF-lignin).</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In vitro gas production</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Samples (200mg DM) were placed into 100ml calibrated glass syringes. Buffered and mineral solutions (Menke and Steingass, 1988) were combined in a 2:1 proportion with rumen fluid collected from three rumen fistulated sheep fed alfalfa hay and a commercial concentrate (75:25). Thirty ml of buffered rumen fluid was dispensed to each syringe. The syringes were shaken by hand at 1h intervals in the initial 3h of incubation. Reading of gas volumes were recorded at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96h of incubation.</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Volatile fatty acid (VFA) production</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Using another set of syringes, after 24h of incubations, ~10ml of syringe contents were sampled followed by centrifuging at 1000</font><font size="2" face="Symbol">´</font><font face="Verdana" size="2"><I>g</I> during 20min. Of the supernatant, 5ml were pipetted into a 10ml plastic tube containing 1ml of 25% metaphosphoric acid solution and centrifuged at 1000</font><font size="2" face="Symbol">´</font><font face="Verdana" size="2"><I>g</I> for subsequent VFA determination by gas chromatography (Getachew <I>et al</I>., 2004).</font></P> <I>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Analysis of </font> </I><font size="2" face="Verdana">in vitro</font><I> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> gas production data</font></P> </I>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Data of the <I>in vitro</I> gas production were analyzed using p=a+b(1-e<SUP>-ct</SUP>), where p: volume of gas produced at time t, b: potential gas production (ml·g<SUP>-1</SUP> DM), and c: fractional rate of gas production (&Oslash;rskov and McDonald, 1979). Moreover, the equation G=A/(1+[B/t]) by France <I>et al</I>. (2000), where G: volume of gas produced at time t, A: asymptotic gas production (ml), and B: time needed to reach one half of the potential gas production (h), was also utilized.</font></P>  <I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Statistical analysis</font></P> </I>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">All the analyses were made by triplicate. The models used were fitted using the tool <I>Solver</I><SUP>&reg;</SUP> of Microsoft Excel 2000<SUP>&reg;</SUP>. The results obtained for the models’ parameters, VFA production and chemical composition were analyzed by ANOVA test of one factor using P&lt;0.05. This analysis was made in a spreadsheet of Microsoft Excel 2000<SUP>&reg;</SUP>.</font></P>  <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Results and Discussion</font></P> </B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The chemical composition of the substrates without treatment and treated by solid substrate fermentation (SSF) are shown in <a href="#t1"> Table I</a>. Significant increases (P&lt;0.05) were registered in the content of crude protein (CP) for the oat straw (20%), maize straw (16%) and bean straw (83%), when <I>P. chrysosporium</I> was used in the SSF. This can be explained by the fungal growth, which transforms sugars and non-protein nitrogen into CP, as observed previously (Villas-Boas <I>et al</I>., 2003). Increases (P&lt;0.05) in the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content in apple pomace (11%) and the increase in hemicellulose content in oat straw (26%) and apple pomace (134%), in relation to non-treated substrate were also registered. <a href="#t2"> Table II</a> shows the values obtained when the parameters of the models were fitted by the &Oslash;rskov and France models. In 85% of the cases, the adjustment made with the model of &Oslash;rskov and McDonald (1979) was better than the adjustment made with the France (France <I>et al</I>, 2000) model. Nevertheless, high values of the r<SUP>2</SUP> coefficient were obtained when using both models. The two models are similar, since A and b have exactly the same meaning (the maximum theoretical volume of gas produced from the substrate, which is reached asymptotically), while B and c are related to the rate of gas production.</font></P>     <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a name="t1"><IMG SRC="/img/fbpe/inci/v32n5/image196.jpg" width=576 height=623></a></font></P>     
<P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a name="t2"><IMG SRC="/img/fbpe/inci/v32n5/image197.jpg" width=571 height=609></a></font></P>      
<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The parameter B represents the time necessary to reach half of the asymptotic gas production, and it is equivalent to the constant of Michaelis-Menten (K<SUB>M</SUB>). Thus, a low value of B indicates a high affinity of the ruminal microflora by the substrate employed. The parameter c has been interpreted as the constant rate of gas production, which indicates the availability of nutrients of a substrate in the rumen (Bl&uuml;mmel and Becker, 1997); a large value of c indicates high availability of substrate. This can be seen as another form of affinity between rumen microflora and substrate.</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The larger values of A (64.08 to 96.90ml per 500mg DM) and b (54.3 to 71.38ml per 500mg DM) were registered usually in substrates without treatment, with the exception of agave bagasse treated with <I>P. chrysosporium</I>, where an increase in the value of A (10%) was observed (P&lt;0.05). Regarding the c parameter, higher values (P&lt;0.05) were registered in substrates such as oat straw, bean straw and agave bagasse without treatment; whereas similar values were obtained in corn stubble and apple pomace with or without treatment (P&gt;0.05). Higher B values were registered in all treated substrates (P&lt;0.05) compared to those without treatment, with the exception of corn stubble, which showed no difference (P&gt;0.05). Moreover, the results indicate a close negative relationship between the c parameter in the &Oslash;rskov’s model and the B value in the France’s model (r= -0.91). Overall, the data might indicate that the residues without treatment have better nutritional characteristics than the treated residues. Bl&uuml;mmel and Becker (1997) reported higher b values (33.6-74ml) in a study using degradation characteristics of 54 straws; however, their rates of gas production (c) were smaller than the values found in the present study. Rodrigues <I>et al.</I> (2002) indicated that there were no differences (P&lt;0.05) when analyzing wheat straw without treatment and adding urea, using Orskov´s and France’s models.</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Villas-Boas <I>et al</I>. (2003) reported increases in the digestibility and nutritious quality of apple pomace treated sequentially with <I>Candida utilis</I> and <I>Pleurotus ostreatus</I>. The results obtained in the present study agree with those obtained by Bauer <I>et al</I>. (2003), who evaluated the effect of enzymatic treatments on several rich carbohydrate substrates using <I>in vitro</I> gas production and France´s model. They found that enzymatic treatments applied to sugar cane pulp and wheat straw diminished A and increased b (P&lt;0.05).</font></P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Collectively, the results of the modeling of gas production data demonstrated that, when the treated residues are given to the microbial consortium of the rumen, the treated substrates are more difficult to consume by this consortium. This can be explained postulating that the filamentous fungi consumed the easily fermenTable fraction of the substrate during SSF, but they do not modify the complex components (lignine, cellulose, hemicellulose) of the residues. Bl&uuml;mmel and Becker (1997) reported that the difference between the values of the parameters reflects differences in the chemical composition of the substrates. Nevertheless, in the present study the chemical analysis of the treated substrates (<a href="#t1">Table I</a>) does not reveal significant differences between treatments of a given substrate, in the cases where there are significant changes in the parameters of the models.</font></P>     <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Ruminants utilize VFA as an energy source, allowing the production of meat and/or milk. <a href="#t3"> Table III</a> shows the molar proportions of VFA. The results indicate significant (P&lt;0.05) changes in the oat straw when SSF treatments were applied. The proportion of acetic acid was greater, while the proportion of propionic acid decreased, when the oat straw was treated with <I>P. chrysosporium</I>. Van Houtert (1993) indicated that relatively large amounts of propionic acid are reported when easily digestible substrates are supplied to rumen microbes. This scenario is probably contrary to what occurred in the present study, where poor cell contents in the studied forages led to a proportionally lower propionate production. SSF treatments did not modify the molar proportions of VFA in the cases of agave bagasse, apple pomace, maize stubble and bean straw. These results agree with those of Bauer <I>et al</I>. (2003), who determined the effects of diverse treatments (measuring <I>in vitro</I> gas production) to improve the quality of foods for ruminants. They applied enzymatic treatments to sugar cane pulp and bean straw, and found that the enzymatic treatment applied to the sugar cane pulp did not produce differences (P&gt;0.05), but in the case of the bean straw receiving enzymatic treatment a decrease in total VFA occurred. Getachew <I>et al</I>. (2004) analyzed several ruminant foods using <I>in vitro</I> gas production, indicating no difference (P&lt;0.05) between the proportions of VFA for substrates without treatment and substrates treated by silage.</font></P>     <P align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a name="t3"><IMG SRC="/img/fbpe/inci/v32n5/image198.jpg" width=532 height=589></a></font></P>  <B>    
<P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Conclusion</font></P> </B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The data presented indicates that the chemical composition, mainly the structural carbohydrates, were not modified in the conditions of this study. As a result, neither the <I>in vitro</I> gas production characteristics nor the VFA profile were improved by the treatment with SSF of the evaluated agro-industrial residues. Thus, direct use of agro-industrial residues for ruminant feed, without microbial or enzymatic treatments, is recommended.</font></P>  <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</font></P> </B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Financial support for this work was provided by the project DGO-2002-C01-2041 from the FOMIX-Durango. A scholarship was provided by CONACYT, Mexico to the first author.</font></P>  <B>    <P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">REFERENCES</font></P> </B>    <!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">1. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis. Vol. II. 16<SUP>th</SUP> ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. Gaithersburgh, MD, USA. pp. 24-32.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047582&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">2. Bauer E, Williams BA, Voigt C, Mosenthin R, Verstegen MWA (2003) Impact of mammalian enzyme pretreatment on the fermentability of carbohydrate-rich feedstuffs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 83: 207-214.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047583&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">3. Bl&uuml;mmel M, Becker K (1997) The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. Br. J. Nutr.. 77: 757-768.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047584&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">4. Cannel E, Moo-Young (1980) Solid-state fermentation system. Process Biochem. 15: 2-7.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047585&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">5. France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, L&oacute;pez S, Bannink A (2000) Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: Derivation of models and other mathematical considerations Br. J. Nutr. 83: 143-150.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047586&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">6. Getachew G, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2002) Tropical browses: Contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. J. Agric. Sci. 139, 341-352.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047587&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">7. Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ (2004) Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 111: 57-71.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047588&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">8. Ghydal P, Ramakrishna M, Losane B, Karanth NG (1992) Gaseosus concentration gradients in dry tipe solid state fermentors effect on yield productivities. Bioprocess Eng. 8: 67-72.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047589&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">9. Jarrige R, Grenet E, Demarquilly C, Besle JM (1995) Les constituants de l’appareil v&eacute;g&eacute;tatif des plantes fourrag&egrave;res. In Jarrige R, Ruckebusch Y, Demarquilly C, Farce MH, Journet M. (Eds.) Nutrition des ruminants domestiques. Ingestion et digestion. INRA. Versailles, France. pp. 25-81.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047590&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">10. Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Devel. 28: 7-55.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047591&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">11. Opatpatanakit Y, Kellaway RC, Lean IJ, Annison G, Kirby A (1994) Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45: 1247-1263.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047592&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">12. &Oslash;rskov ER, McDonald L (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to the rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92: 499-503.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047593&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">13. Pandey A (2003) Solid state fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 13: 81-84.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047594&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">14. Rodrigues MAM, Fonseca AJM, Sequeira CA, Dias-da-Silva AA (2002) Digestion kinetic parameters from an in vitro gas production method as predictors of voluntary intake of forage by mature ewes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 95: 133-142.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047595&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">15. Soto-Cruz NO (2003) Evaluaci&oacute;n de la disponibilidad de residuos agroindustriales en el Estado de Durango. Primer informe t&eacute;cnico del proyecto: Producci&oacute;n de sustratos para la alimentaci&oacute;n de rumiantes por fermentaci&oacute;n en medio s&oacute;lido de residuos agroindustriales. Instituto Tecnol&oacute;gico de Durango. M&eacute;xico.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047596&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">16. Stern MD, Bach A, Calsamiglia S (1997) Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 2256-2276.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047597&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">17. Van Houtert MFJ (1993) The production and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by ruminants fed roughages. A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 43:189-225.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047598&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">18. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysacharides in relation to animal nutrition. Symposium: Carbohydrate, methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047599&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">19. Villas-B&otilde;as SG, Esposito E, Matos de Mendon&ccedil;a M (2003) Bioconversion of apple pomace into a nutritionally enriched substrate by Candida utilis and Pleurotus ostreatus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 461-467.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047600&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">20. Williams BA (2000) Cumulative gas-production techniques for forage evaluation. In Givens DI, Owen E, Omed HM, Axford RFE (Eds.) Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CABI. Wallingford, UK. 475 pp.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1047601&pid=S0378-1844200700050001100020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>AOAC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Official methods of analysis]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<edition>16</edition>
<page-range>24-32</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eMD MD]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaithersburgh]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Voigt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mosenthin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verstegen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MWA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Impact of mammalian enzyme pretreatment on the fermentability of carbohydrate-rich feedstuffs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Sci. Food Agric.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<page-range>207-214</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blümmel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Becker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br. J. Nutr..]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>757-768</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cannel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E, Moo-Young]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Solid-state fermentation system]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Process Biochem.]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>2-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[France]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dijkstra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhanoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bannink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: Derivation of models and other mathematical considerations Br]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Nutr.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<page-range>143-150</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Getachew]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Makkar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HPS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Becker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical browses: Contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Agric. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>139</volume>
<page-range>341-352</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Getachew]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DePeters]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<page-range>57-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghydal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramakrishna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Losane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karanth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gaseosus concentration gradients in dry tipe solid state fermentors effect on yield productivities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bioprocess Eng.]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>67-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jarrige]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruckebusch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Demarquilly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Journet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nutrition des ruminants domestiques: Ingestion et digestion]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>25-81</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Versailles ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[INRA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steingass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anim. Res. Devel.]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>7-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Opatpatanakit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kellaway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Annison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirby]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aust. J. Agric. Res.]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>1247-1263</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ørskov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ER]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McDonald]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to the rate of passage]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Agric. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>92</volume>
<page-range>499-503</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pandey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Solid state fermentation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biochem. Eng. J.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<page-range>81-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigues]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MAM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fonseca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sequeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dias-da-Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Digestion kinetic parameters from an in vitro gas production method as predictors of voluntary intake of forage by mature ewes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<page-range>133-142</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto-Cruz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NO]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación de la disponibilidad de residuos agroindustriales en el Estado de Durango: Primer informe técnico del proyecto: Producción de sustratos para la alimentación de rumiantes por fermentación en medio sólido de residuos agroindustriales]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Tecnológico de Durango]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calsamiglia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Anim. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>2256-2276</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Houtert MFJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The production and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by ruminants fed roughages]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>189-225</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Soest PJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robertson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysacharides in relation to animal nutrition. Symposium: Carbohydrate, methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Dairy Sci.]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>3583-3597</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villas-Bõas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esposito]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[de Mendonça M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Bioconversion of apple pomace into a nutritionally enriched substrate by Candida utilis and Pleurotus ostreatus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>461-467</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Givens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Owen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Omed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Axford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RFE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>475</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Wallingford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CABI]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
