<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0798-0752</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Anales Venezolanos de Nutrición]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[An Venez Nutr]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0798-0752</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fundación Bengoa]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0798-07522015000100015</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Isolation and partial characterization of bean phytohemagglutinins]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaffé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Werner]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Abraham]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dolores]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Central Caracas Escuela de Biología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Caracas ]]></addr-line>
<country>Venezuela</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>074</fpage>
<lpage>081</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0798-07522015000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0798-07522015000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0798-07522015000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Los extractos de semillas de 21 variedades de caraota fueron ensayados para determinar la especificidad hemaglutinante y la actividad mitogénica. Entre las diferentes variedades de caraotas se pueden distinguir cuatro tipos, dos de los cuales son mitógenos. Se aislaron dos fracciones de lectinas (&#945; y b) de cada uno de los cuatro tipos de caraotas. Sus PM fueron estimados por cromatografía de exclusión y los azúcares presentes por cromatografía en papel. La actividad hemaglutinante, la inhibición de la acción hemaglutinante por derivados de azúcares y glucopéptidos, así como la acción mitogénica, se determinaron para las ocho lectinas purificadas y las cuatro preparaciones control. Las fracciones &#945; y b aisladas a partir de dos de los tipos de caraotas mostraron solamente acción mitogénica mínima, mientras que las de los otros dos tipos de caraotas y todas las preparaciones control fueron mitógenos potentes. Todas las preparaciones mitogénicas aglutinaron en altas diluciones tanto a los glóbulos rojos de vaca activados con tripsina como a los de hámster activados con pronasa; sin embargo, algunas preparaciones resultaron inactivas cuando se probaron con los glóbulos rojos humanos o de conejo.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Extracts of seeds of 21 bean cultlvars were screened for hemagglutinating specifity and for mitogenic activity. Four types could be distinguished in different beans, two of which are mitogens. Two lectin fractions (a and &#946;) were isolated from each of the four bean types. Their MW were estimated by exclusion chromatography and component sugars by paper chromatography. Hemagglutinating activity, inhibition of hemagglutinating action by sugar-derivatives and glyco-peptides as well as mitogenic action were determined for the eight purified lectins and four control preparations. The a and &#946;-fractions isolated from two bean types had only minimal mitogenic action, while those from the other two bean types and all of the control preparations were potent mitogens. All the mitogenic preparations agglutinated trypsin-activated cow red blood cells and pronase-activated hamster red blood cells in high dilutions but some were inactlve when tested with human or rabbit red blood cells.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Phaseolus vulgaris]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[leguminosoae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[caraotas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[lectinas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fitohemaglutininas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[glucoproteínas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estimulación de linfocitos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Phaseolus vulgaris]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[leguminosoae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[beans]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[lectins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[phytohemagglutinins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[glycoproteins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[lymphocyte stimulation]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Artículo W. Jaffe</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">An Venez Nutr 2015; 28(1): 74-81.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana">    <br> <b>Isolation and partial characterization of bean phytohemagglutinins*</b></font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Werner G. Jaffé<sup>1</sup>, Abraham Levy<sup>1</sup> and Dolores I. González<sup>1</sup>.</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>1</sup> Escuela de Biología, Apartado Postal 10098, Universidad Central Caracas,  Venezuela.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Resumen:</b> Los extractos de semillas de 21 variedades de caraota fueron ensayados  para determinar la especificidad hemaglutinante y la actividad mitogénica. Entre  las diferentes variedades de caraotas se pueden distinguir cuatro tipos, dos de  los cuales son mitógenos. Se aislaron dos fracciones de lectinas (&#945; y b) de cada  uno de los cuatro tipos de caraotas. Sus PM fueron estimados por cromatografía  de exclusión y los azúcares presentes por cromatografía en papel. La actividad  hemaglutinante, la inhibición de la acción hemaglutinante por derivados de  azúcares y glucopéptidos, así como la acción mitogénica, se determinaron para  las ocho lectinas purificadas y las cuatro preparaciones control. Las fracciones  &#945; y b aisladas a partir de dos de los tipos de caraotas mostraron solamente  acción mitogénica mínima, mientras que las de los otros dos tipos de caraotas y  todas las preparaciones control fueron mitógenos potentes. Todas las  preparaciones mitogénicas aglutinaron en altas diluciones tanto a los glóbulos  rojos de vaca activados con tripsina como a los de hámster activados con pronasa;  sin embargo, algunas preparaciones resultaron inactivas cuando se probaron con  los glóbulos rojos humanos o de conejo. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <b>Palabras clave:</b> Phaseolus vulgaris, leguminosoae, caraotas, lectinas,  fitohemaglutininas, glucoproteínas, estimulación de linfocitos.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>    <br> Abstract: </b>Extracts of seeds of 21 bean cultlvars were screened for  hemagglutinating specifity and for mitogenic activity. Four types could be  distinguished in different beans, two of which are mitogens. Two lectin  fractions (a and &#946;) were isolated from each of the four bean types. Their MW  were estimated by exclusion chromatography and component sugars by paper  chromatography. Hemagglutinating activity, inhibition of hemagglutinating action  by sugar-derivatives and glyco-peptides as well as mitogenic action were  determined for the eight purified lectins and four control preparations. The a  and &#946;-fractions isolated from two bean types had only minimal mitogenic action,  while those from the other two bean types and all of the control preparations  were potent mitogens. All the mitogenic preparations agglutinated trypsin-activated  cow red blood cells and pronase-activated hamster red blood cells in high  dilutions but some were inactlve when tested with human or rabbit red blood  cells. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Key Word Index:</b> Phaseolus vulgaris, leguminosoae, beans, lectins,  phytohemagglutinins, glycoproteins, lymphocyte stimulation.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The interesting biological effects of phytohemagglutinins or lectins on normal  and pathological animal cells have stimulated research in this field in recent  years.(1) Considerable efforts have been made by several groups of investigators  toward the purification and physical and chemical characterization of the  lectins from beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). (2-8)</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> However, poorly defined seed materials and different purification procedures  have been used. The materials thus obtained differed considerably in chemical  and in biological properties. Our aim in the present work was to obtain a number  of reasonably purified bean lectins from selected seed lots in order to compare  their properties. It was hoped that this approach would help to clarify and  interpret the contradictory observations reported in the literature.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> When the hemagglutinating action of extracts of different bean cultivars was  measured against different rbc preparations, four specificity types, called A,  B, C, and D respectively, were detected (9). The purification of lectins from  bean cultivars belonging to these four specificity types will be described in  the present paper, as well as some of their physical, chemical, and biological  characteristics.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Results</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Screening of bean seeds</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>    <br> </b>The results of the screening test of 21 bean cultivars for mitogenic activity are presented in <a href="#t1">Table 1</a>. In all cultures of lymphocytes  to which extracts from A or C-type beans had been added, blastic transformation  was observed in 30 - 40% and mitotic figures in 45% of the cells. The cultures  with added extracts of B or D-type beans never exhibited more than 3%, blastic  cells and no mitogenic figures at all.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="t1"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.1.jpg" width="597" height="493"></p>     
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Isolation of lectins</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> On chromatography on Biogel P-100 of the fractions obtained by alcohol  precipitation of the extracts from the four bean cultivars, hemagglutination  activity measured with pronase-activated hamster rbc was confined to the first  of the two elution peaks. When the material of these active peaks was submitted  to chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, two well separated peaks emerged at about  pH 7.9 (&#945;-fraction) and 5.9 (&#946;-fraction). Both contained hemagglutinating  proteins. The first peak was small when the extracts form the type-D beans were  analyzed, while no important differences were observed between the height of the  two peaks with the extracts of the other bean types.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> All of the fractions eluted from DEAE-cellulose were subjected to chromatography  on Sephadex G-100. In each case this resulted in further separation: a small  peak emerged after a much larger main peak. In the present work only the  materials of the main peaks were investigated.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Physical and chemical characteristics</font></b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The MWs estimated for the main fractions are presented in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>. The electrophoretic mobilities of all purified fractions in polyacrylamide gel slabs  at pH 8.9 were very similar. In the microzone electrophoresis, however, the  proteins of the &#946;-fractions travelled faster toward the anode than did the &#945;-fractions  both at pH 8.8 and 6.25.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> At present we have no explanation for these results.</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The sugars identified by paper chromatography in the hydrolysates of the lectin  fractions are listed in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>. The number of different sugars detected varied  from two in three of the &#946;-fractions to six in two of the &#945;-fractions. All but  one of the lectin fractions were precipitated by Concanavalin A in the double  diffusion test (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>). This precipitation did not occur when the inhibitor &#945;-methyl-D-mannoside  was added to the system.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="t2"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.2.jpg" width="604" height="294"></p>     
<p align="justify"><a name="f1"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.3.jpg" width="499" height="426"></p>     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Hemagglutinatin activity</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The hemagglutinating action measured with normal rabbit rbc, trypsin-activated  cow rbc, and pronase-activated hamster rbc are presented in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>. The results  show that the specificity differed in the same way as it did in the crude  extracts but was identical for the &#945; and &#946;-fractions of any one bean cultivar.  All fractions were active against pronase-treated hamster rbc. In all cases, the  &#946;-fractions were less active than the &#945;-fractions. Of the control lectins two  agglutinated rabbit rbc strongly and two did so only very weakly.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="t3"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.4.jpg" width="605" height="452"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The inhibitory action on hemagglutination of a number of sugar-derivatives and  carbohydrate-containing compounds of the lectins used in the present study are  included in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a>. Only the results for pronase-treated hamster rbc are  presented because this was the only blood preparation agglutinated by all of the  lectins. There were differences between the effects of the lectins from the  different bean varieties with respect to their susceptibilites to the inhibitors  but the two fractions obtained from each variety behaved in an identical way.  Fetuin and N-acetyl-galactosamine inhibited all of the lectins. The A-, B- and  C-type bean fractions were also inhibited by pig erythrocyte mucoid and the B-type  bean fractions by N-acetyl-glucosamine.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="t4"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.5.jpg" width="596" height="325"></p>     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Lymphocyte-stimulating activity</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Some results of the tests for mitogenic activity are included in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>. It can  be seen that the B and D- type lectins showed only minimal mitogenic activity  and that the &#946;-fractions were less active than the &#945;-fractions.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="t5"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img border="0"  src="/img/fbpe/avn/v28n1/art15.6.jpg" width="539" height="226"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The results of a typical adsorption experiment is presented in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a>. The strong hemagglutinating activity on trypsin-activated cow rbc and the mitogenic activity remained when a mixture of A- and C-type bean extracts was adsorbed  with rabbit rbc, while treatment with cow rbc eliminated both activities  simultaneously.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Discussion</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> The screening test indicates that mitogenic activity is not found in the  extracts of all bean varieties. Similar observations had been reported by other  authors.10,11 All the mitogenic samples belonged to bean varieties classified as  A or C-types according to their rcspective hemagglutinating specificities.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The isolated lectins from these four bean types had the same hemagglutinating  specificity as the corresponding crude extracts (<a href="#t3">Table 3</a>). This means that the  action of the crude extracts on different types of rbc and on lymphocytes was  not due to the combined activities of different factors, but can be explained by  the multiple activity of the lectins isolated from each of these extracts.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The erythro-agglutinating action of all the bean lectins tested was inhibited by  fetuin and N-acetyl-D-galactosamime which had previously been shown to possess  inhibitory activities under comparable conditions (12,13). Three of the four  lectin types were inhibited by pig erythrocyte mucoid, which has been described  as a potent inhibitor of kidney bean lectin. (14) In our experiments its  activity was rather weak and similar to that of fetuin.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Our results show that the differences in specificity between the four bean  lectin types are quantitative rather than qualitative, because a weak  agglutinating activity could be detected with high concentrations of lectins of  B and D-type beans tested against tripsin-activated cow rbc and of C and D-type  lectins tested with rabbit rbc. Also, the “inactive” lectins of the B and D-types  had a weak but detectable stimulating action on lymphocytes. The previous observation that bean lectins are absorbed not only  by the erythrocytes they agglutinate but to a lesser degree by those cells which  are more or less refractory toward their agglutinating action (9) also supports  this conclusion.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> All fractions were tested repeatedly for mitogenic activity in lymphocyte  cultures at concentrations between 75 and 01 mg/mL. Maximal activities were  observed at 3-10 mg/mL. The response curves observed by us were less bell-shaped  than in the studies of Rigas and Tisdale (15) who obtained maximal response of  their bean phytohemagglutinin at a concentration of 5 mg/mL. Leucocytes obtained  from different donors responded somewhat differently to the different lectins.  The values presented in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a> were therefore estimated from several  experiments. From these results it is clear that B- and D-type lectins have only  minimal mitogenic activity and it also appears that the &#945;-fractions are more  active than the &#946;-fractions. Quantitative comparisons of the activities is  complicated because of the instability of bean lectins.(4) The WBH used in our  experiments had been stored for 4 yr as a lyophilized powder at 4° and our  fractions had been kept frozen for 1 yr. Differences in the degree of  denaturation, purity, and specific activity could therefore account for the  quantitative divergences in biological activities between the different  preparations.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> Several of the most exhaustively purified bean lectins possess both  hemagglutinating and mitogenic activities (2, 4, 8) while some authors claim to  have obtained mitogenic preparations without or with only minimal action on red  blood cells.(5-7, 16-18) Our results prove that these contradictory observations  may be explained if A-type lectins had been obtained by the first group of  authors and C-type lectins by the second. Indeed, WBH and PPHA possess the  biological properties of A-type</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> lectins while PHA and LA are typical C-type lectins.    <br> Erythrocytes which are not agglutinated by some types of bean lectins may  nevertheless bind them, but they are much more active in binding the lectin  types which are most efficient in agglutinating that special type of blood cell.9  Therefore, when a mixture of A- and C-type lectins is adsorbed with rabbit blood,  the C-type lectin will be concentrated in the supernatant and exhibit mitogenic  activity but no significant agglutinating action when tested with rabbit or  human rbc (<a href="#t5">Table 5</a>). The experiments of several investigators (19-22) who  claimed to separate erythroagglutinins from mitogens by adsorption of the former  on rbc are therefore no proof for the existence of these separate factors as  long as they have not been tested with an appropriate rbc preparation.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The carbohydrates found in the eight bean lectins analyzed were all different  and were also different from those detected in the bean lectins described by  other authors (2, 3, 6, 8). The fact that with one exception the bean lectins  are precipitated by Con A indicates that they have some non-reducing D-glucoside  or mannoside residues. (23) The 4 control lectins included were likewise  precipitated by Con A in the double diffusion test. These precipitations do not  occur in the presence of the Con A-inhibitor &#945;-methyl-mannoside. It seems that  there are no two bean lectins among all those studied until now which have the  same carbohydrate composition.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Our &#945;- and &#946;-fractions had different isoelectric points as revealed by the  differences in pH at which they were eluted from DEAE-cellulose and because they  differed in their electrophoretic mobilities. Sugar components as well as MWs  were also different, but biological activities were qualitatively identical  between the lectins obtained from anyone bean sample. The &#945;-fractions had  somewhat higher MWs as determined by gel filtration and a greater number of  sugar components than the p-fractions. In the former, fucose was a constant  component which was not found in the latter. The term “isolectins” has been used  for multiple forms of agglutinins isolated from the same seed extracts having  identical biological activities and MWs but differing in electrophoretic  mobilities and sugar components. (24)</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> The A-type hemagglutinin specificity is inherited as a single dominant trait as  has been found in previous work from this laboratory, (9) but it is found in at  least two different isolectins, the &#945;- and &#946;-fractions described in the present  paper. These facts can be explained by postulating an active subunit, common to  both fractions. The presence of active subunits in bean lectins has been  demonstrated by several groups of authors. (1,17, 25, 27)</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Yachnin and Svenson have observed five protein bands in the purified active  fraction obtained from a crude bean hemagglutinin.(17) They propose a structure  composed of four subunits and suggest the existence of two kinds of subunits. By  different combinations five different proteins could result in analogy to some  isoenzymes like lactic dehydrogenase. One subunit would be responsible for  mitogenic and the other for hemagglutinating activity. The presence of both  hemagglutinating and mitogenic actions in our &#945;- and &#946;- fractions would mean  that both must contain the two types of subunits Nevertheless, according to the  data of Table 2 the sugar constituents of the respective &#945;- and &#946;- fractions  were different in all cases, contrary to what should have been expected if both  consisted of the same kind of subunits in different proportions and if these  subunits bear the sugar residues. In order to reconcile our results with the  aformentioned hypothesis it must be assumed that the carbohydrate moieties are  added to the lectin molecules after these have been assembled from their  subunits.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Many commercial bean varieties tested in this laboratory by the single-seed  assay proved to consist of mixtures of two or three bean types. When used for  fractionation work, these materials may yield several types of lectins. The  B-type lectins, when assayed with rabbit or human rbc would appear as  erythroagglutinins without significant mitogenic action and the C-type lectins  would appear to be mitogens without hemagglutinating action until  trypsin-activated cow rbc or pronase-activated hamster rbc are used. On the  other hand, the A-type lectins will exhibit both activities when tested with any  type of blood. Therefore, trypsin-activated cow rbc should always be used along  with the other blood preparations. A bean lectin preparation of known activity  should be included in the tests because some cow blood samples will not produce  a normal reaction, (9) a fact which is probably related to the different blood  groups of cattle. (28)</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> It is noteworthy that the bean types most active in mitotic stimulation are also  the most toxic. (29) It seems possible that both activities are somehow related.  Hopefully, further in sight into the structural details of these closely related  lectins may be useful for exploring the features required for the mitogenic  activity and toxicity.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Experimental</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Preliminary screening test. Extracts from seeds of 21 genetically pure lines of  beans grown in the experimental field of this Departament were tested for  hemagglutinating action. Single seeds were ground in a mortar and weighed  portions extracted with 10 parts of a 1% NaCl soln for 2 hr. Suspensions of  washed red blood cells (rbc) were added to aliquots of serial dilutions of these  extracts. Native cow rbc are not agglutinated by bean phytohemagglutinins (9),  In order to make them susceptible to hemagglutination they were trated for 30  min with a 0.1% soln of crystallized trypsin in physiological saline, washed 3  x, and resuspended. Hamster rbc were activated by treatment with 0.1- pronase  for 1 hr. Rabit rbc were used on the native form. Hemagglutination tests were  performed using the microtitration kit (Cooke Engineering Comp., Alexandria,  Virginia). Because some cow blood samples are refractory to hemagglutination by  bean lectins even after trypsin-activation a control lectin preparation of known  activity was included in every test.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Mitogenic activity.</b> Crude extracts obtained from single seeds of these 21 bean  cultivars were tested in duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes from 2  different donors by the microscopic observation technique of Favier et al. (30)</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Purification of the lectins.</b> Seed samples of each one of the 4 specificity types  were selected and uniformity of the lots was verified by testing at least 50  single seeds with the 3 blood cell preparations described above. The selected  bean cvs were: Negro Nicoya, black, type A- Cubagua, subline, black, type B;  Vainica Saavedra, black, type C; Alabaster, white, type D. Ground seeds (20 g)  of each of the 4 selected bean samples were suspended in 200 mL of H<sub>2</sub>O, adjusted  to pH 4 and stirred for 24 hr at 4°, following centrifugation the supernatants were heated to 80° for 10  min, neutralized and clarified by centrifugation at 2°. EtOH of the same temp.  was slowly added with mechanical stirring. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The ppts which were formed by  addition of EtOH in the range of 33-66% were dissolved in Tris-HCl 0.01 M, pH  7.6 and passed through a 250 mL column of Biogel P-100. The fractions contained  in the first elution peaks were concn under red.pres. The pH was adjusted to 8  and the material was passed through a DEAE-cellulose column stabilized at pH 8 with 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer. The column was washed with Tris-succinate  buffer of a pH gradient varying from 8.38. The eluates of the two main peaks  which emerged at pH 7. 9 and 5. 9 were dialysed, concn and passed through a  column of Sephadex G-100 which had been calibrated with the following proteins:  pepsin, ovalbumin, trypsin, WBH and hemoglobin. A calibration curve in which the  MWs were plotted against the respective elution vol was constructed and the MWs  of the bean fractions were estimated from their corresponding elution vols. The  eluates of the peaks were concn and frozen.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> Incorporation of the thymidine [3H] into DNA by the isolated lectins was tested  as follows to 2 ml duplicate cultures of about 14 x 106 human lymphocytes purified by glass  bead chromatography (31) labeled thymidine (1 µCi/culture) was added after 48 hr  of cultivation, and the latter was allowed to continue for another 20 hr. The thymidine incorporation into the DNA was measured in a liquid  scintillation counter. (32) </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Each fraction was tested 3-5 times at levels between  75 and 0.1 µg/mL. For the agglutination-inhibition tests the lectins were titrated in  the ‘Microtiter” equipment using a soln of the inhibitors in physiological  saline as the diluent. The following inhibitors were used N-acetyl-D-glucosamine  (Serva). N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Sigma), fetuin (Calbiochem), and pig  erythrocyte mucoid. (14)</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>    <br> Double diffusion tests.</b> Performed in 1.25% agar plates using 0.5% solns of the  bean lectins and in the center well a 1% soln of Con A. Sugar analysis. After  hydrolysing 5 mg portions of the lyophylized fractions for 2 hr at 100° with 2N  H2S04, sugars were determined by ascending paper chromatography. They were  revealed with AgNO3 in acetone-H2O or with aniline-phthalate and the  amino-sugars by the Morgan-Elson technique as described earlier. Pure sugars  were chromatographed simultaneously with the experimental samples. Crude bean  extracts and washed and packed red blood cells were mixed for the adsorption  experiments in the proportion of 2:1. After 30 min of agitation the mixture was  centrifuged and the procedure repeated. Hemagglutinating and mitogenic  activities were determined in the supernatants after each adsorption.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>    <br> Electrophoresis.</b> The protein fractions were subjected to microzone  electrophoresis in phosphate buffer of pH 7.9 and 6.2 and to electrophoresis on  vertical polyacrylamide gel slabs. The discontinuous technique was used, the  running gel being 10% Cyanogum-41 in 0.50 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.9 and the  spacer gel 5% Cyanogum-41in 0.10 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 6.7. Both buffers  contained 0.24% TEMED and 0.0024% Tween    <br>     <br> 80. Electrode buffer was Tris-glycine 0.05 M, pH 8.4. For comparison samples of  commercial bean hemagglutinin (PHA) (Wellcome Lab lot No. K 4403), wax bean  hemagglutinin (WBH),(2) kidney bean leucoagglutinin (LA)(7) and  phytohemagglutinin (PPHA)(8) were included in the tests for biological activity.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>Acknowledgements</b>:</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> We are indebted to Dr I. Posner for performing the analytical polyacrylamide  electrophoresis and for useful suggestions in the preparation of this  manuscript, to Mr A. Callejas for some of the hemagglutination tests, to Mrs    <br> V. Gómez for the mitosis tests, to Mrs M. Jaffé for some sugar analysis. We  thank Dr I. E. Liener for a gift of WBH. Dr D. A. Rigas for a gift of PPHA,    <br> Dr T. Weber for a gift of kidney bean leucoagglutanin (LA), Dr G. Uhlenbruck for  a gift of pig mucoid. The financial support of the Consejo del Desarrollo  Científico y Humanístico of the Central University of Venezuela and the CONICIT  is gratefully acknowledged.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> <b>References</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 1. Sharon N, Lis H. Science 1972; 177: 949.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 2. Takahashi T, Ramachandramurthy P, Liener IE. Biochim Biophys Acta 1967; 133:  123.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335876&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 3. Jaffe WG, Hannig K. Arch Biochem Biophys 1965; 109: 80.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335879&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 4. Dahlgren K, Porath J, Lindahl-Kiessling K. Arch Biochem Biophys 1970; 137:  306.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 5. Oh YH, Conrad RA. Biochim Biophys Acta 1971; 146: 525.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335884&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 6. Allen IW, Svenson RH, Yachnin S. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1969; 63: 334.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335887&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 7. Räsänen V, Weber T, Gräsbeck R. European J Biochem 1973; 38: 193.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335890&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 8. Rigas DA, Head C, Eginitis-Rigas C. Physiol Chem Phys 1972; 4: 153.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335893&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 9. Jaffe WG, Brücher O, Palozzo A. Z Inmun Forsch 1972; 142: 439.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 10. Krüpe M, Wirth W, Nies D, Ensgraber A. Z Immun Forsch 1968; 135: 19.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 11. Beckman L, Fichteliur KE, Finley SL, Finley WH, Lindahl-Kiessling K.  Hereditas 1962; 48: 619.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335900&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 12. Borberg H, Woodruff J, Hirschhorn R, Gesner B, Miescher P, Silber R. Science  1966; 154: 1019.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335903&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 13. Kornfeld R, Kornfeld S. J Biol Chem 1970; 245: 2536.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335906&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 14. Uhlenbruck G, Reifenberg U, Oyen R. Z Naturforsch 1969; 24b: 147.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335909&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 15. Rigas DA, Tisdale VV. Expertentia 1969; 25: 399.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335912&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 16. Allan D, Crumpton MJ. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1971; 44: 1143.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335915&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 17. Yachnin S, Svenson RH. Immunology 1972; 22: 871.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335918&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> 18. Punnet T, Punnet HH. Nature 1963; 198: 1173.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 19. Barkhan P, Ballas A. Nature 1963; 200: 141.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 20. Kolodney RL, Hirschhorn K. Nature 1964; 201: 715.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 21. Börjeson J, Bourengh R, Norden A, Thunell S. Biochim Biophys Acta 1964; 82:  158.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> 22. Schumacher K, Oerkermann H, Uhlenbruck G, Alzer G, Hirschmann WD, Gross R.  Klin Wschr 1971; 49: 286.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><br> 23. Goldstein IJ, Iyer RN. Biochim Biophys Acta 1966; 121: 197.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335931&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 24. Entlicher G, Kostir JV, Kovourek J. Biochim Biophys Acta 1971; 236: 795.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335934&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 25. Rigas DA, Head C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1969; 34: 633.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335937&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 26. Karmanski IM, Morozkin AD. Vop Med Khim 1971; 17: 290. Chem Abstr 1972; 75:  59757.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335940&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 27. Weber T, Aro H, Nordman CT. Biochem Biophys Acta 1971; 263: 94.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335943&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 28. Hines HC, Uhlenbruch G, Schmid DQ. Vox Sang 1972; 22: 529.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335946&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 29. Jaffe WG, Brücher O. Arch Latinoam Nutr 1972; 22: 267.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335949&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 30. Favier Y, Viette M, Saint-Paul M. Nouv Rév Hémat 1961; 1: 872.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335952&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 31. Rabinowitz Y. Blood 1964; 23: 811.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335955&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    <!-- ref --><br> 32. Weber T. Scand K Clin Lab Invest 1969; 21(suppl 101): 15.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=335958&pid=S0798-0752201500010001500027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> An Venez Nutr 2015; 28(1): 74-81. 81.</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>       ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[x]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>177</volume>
<page-range>949</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takahashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramachandramurthy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochim Biophys Acta]]></source>
<year>133</year>
<page-range>123</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[1967]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hannig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Biochem Biophys]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahlgren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Porath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindahl-Kiessling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[x]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Biochem Biophys]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
<volume>137</volume>
<page-range>306</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conrad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochim Biophys Acta]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<volume>146</volume>
<page-range>525</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Svenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yachnin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proc Nat Acad Sci]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<page-range>334</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Räsänen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gräsbeck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[European J Biochem]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>193</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rigas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Head]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eginitis-Rigas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Physiol Chem Phys]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>153</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brücher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palozzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Inmun Forsch]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>142</volume>
<page-range>439</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krüpe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wirth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ensgraber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Immun Forsch]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<volume>135</volume>
<page-range>19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beckman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fichteliur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindahl-Kiessling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hereditas]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>619</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woodruff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hirschhorn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gesner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miescher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<volume>154</volume>
<page-range>1019</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kornfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kornfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Biol Chem]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
<volume>245</volume>
<page-range>2536</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uhlenbruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reifenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oyen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Z Naturforsch]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>24b</volume>
<page-range>147</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rigas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tisdale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Expertentia]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>399</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crumpton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochem Biophys Res Commun]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<page-range>1143</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yachnin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Svenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Immunology]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>871</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goldstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RN]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochim Biophys Acta]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<page-range>197</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Entlicher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kostir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kovourek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochim Biophys Acta]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<volume>236</volume>
<page-range>795</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rigas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Head]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochem Biophys Res Commun]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>633</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karmanski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morozkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Vop Med Khim. 1971; 17: 290]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Chem Abstr]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>59757</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nordman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CT]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biochem Biophys Acta]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<volume>263</volume>
<page-range>94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hines]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uhlenbruch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schmid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DQ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vox Sang]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>529</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brücher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Latinoam Nutr]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>267</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Favier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viette]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saint-Paul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nouv Rév Hémat]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>872</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rabinowitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Blood]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>811</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Scand K Clin Lab Invest]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>21(suppl 101)</volume>
<page-range>15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
