The kelp macrocystis pyrifera as nutritional supplement for goats.

El alga marina macrocystis pyrifera como sumplemento alimenticio para cabras.

 Nidia Mora Castro¹, Margarita Casas Valdez¹*, Alejandro Marín Álvarez¹, Ruth Noemí Águila Ramírez¹, Ignacio Sánchez Rodríguez¹, Hugo Hernández Contreras² and Leonor Sanginés García³

¹ Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-IPN). Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, Apdo. Postal 592, La Paz, B.C.S., México, C.P. 23090.

² Departamento de Zootecnia. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur. Km 5 Carr. al Sur. La Paz, B.C.S., México, C.P. 23050.

³ Departamento de Nutrición Animal. Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, México D. F., C.P. 14000. *E-mail: mcasasv@hotmail.com.

ABSTRACT

The present study was aimed to evaluate Macrocystis pyrifera (MP) meal as a nutritional supplement for goats. There is an increasing interest to look at nutritional alternatives to guarantee a continuous supply of good quality forage for goats, in many communities around the world. Given its abundance and chemical composition, the algae M. pyrifera is an important potential resource as animal feed. Three diets with 10, 20, and 30% of MP meal concentrations and a control diet, with no algae, were evaluated. Four rumen cannulated goats, housed individually in metabolism cages, were used. The experimental design was a 4 x 4 Latin-Square. Feed and water intake, excreted urine and faeces, were measured. Digestibility in vivo, dry matter (DM) disappearance, and the metabolic variables of pH and ammoniacal nitrogen in the rumen, were determined. There was no significant difference in the feed intake but there was in water intake and urine excreted. No significant difference in digestibility in vivo among diets (P>0.05) was found. A significant difference (P<0.05) for degradability in situ was found for the algae diets containing 10 and 30% MP concentrations at 96 hours of sampling (78.3 and 82.2%). The raw algae in situ digestibility was 77%. A potential degradability of 87.3% was obtained with 30% MP diet. The highest effective degradation was obtained at an estimated rate of 0.02 h^-1. Ruminal pH was higher (P<0.05) in all MP treatments (10% MP: 6.83, 20% MP: 6.85, 30% MP: 6.91). As suggested by the results, M. pyrifera represents a good unconventional feeding as a nutritional supplement for goats.

Key words: Marine algae, digestibility, goats, nonconventional feed, Macrocystis. ]]> RESUMEN

El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar Macrocystis pyrifera (MP) como suplemento alimenticio para cabras. Hay un interés creciente en buscar alternativas alimenticias para garantizar el suministro continuo de forraje de buena calidad para cabras en muchas comunidades del mundo. Dada su abundancia y composición química, el alga M. pyrifera es un recurso potencial importante como pienso para ganado. Se evaluaron tres dietas con concentraciones de 10, 20, y 30% de harina de MP, y una dieta control, sin las algas. Se utilizaron cuatro cabras canuladas dispuestas individualmente en jaulas metabólicas. El diseño experimental fue un Cuadrado Latino 4 x 4. El alimento y agua consumidos, la orina y las heces excretadas fueron medidas. Se determinaron la digestibilidad in vivo, la desaparición in situ de la materia seca y las variables metabólicas pH y nitrógeno amoniacal en rumen. No se encontró diferencia significativa en el alimento consumido, ni en la digestibilidad in vivo entre las dietas (P>0,05), pero si hubo diferencia significativa en el consumo de agua y la orina excretada (P<0,05). Se encontró diferencia significativa (P<0,05) para la digestibilidad in situ en las dietas que contenían el 10 y 30% del alga a la hora 96 del muestreo (78,3 y el 82,2%). La digestibilidad in situ del alga fue de 77%. Se obtuvo una degradabilidad potencial de 87,3% con la dieta que contiene 30% de MP. La mayor degradación efectiva se obtuvo a una tasa estimada de 0,02 h^-1. El pH ruminal fue más alto (P<0,05) en todos los tratamientos con MP (10% de MP: 6,83, 20% de MP: 6,85, 30% de MP: 6,91). Los resultados obtenidos sugieren que M. pyrifera representa un buen suplemento nutricional no convencional para cabras.

Palabras clave: Alga marina, digestibilidad, cabras, alimento no convencional, Macrocystis.

Recibido: 22 / 10 / 2007. Aceptado: 09 / 02 / 2008.

INTRODUCTION

An insufficient yearly supply of good-quality feeding forage is common throughout tropical and subtropical regions, particularly in semiarid areas around the world, where native pastures and browse from trees constitute the main forages and, in most cases, the sole components of livestock nutrition [26]. Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of unconventional resources to guarantee continuous supplies of good quality forage. Among these resources the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh is considered a potential resource for animal feeding, given its considerable abundance along the coasts of North and South America, South Africa, Australia and New Zeland, its high regeneration rate after harvest, and its good chemical composition [3].

Studies concerning the digestibility of seaweeds are scarce [9], but it is crucial to have information about this particular issue, prior to the inclusion of this alga in animal feeding. Arieli et al. [2] test the value of Ulva lactuca Linnaeus as supplement for ram lambs Ovis aries Six five months old rams, with an average body weight of 40 kg were used for four weeks; the experimental diet included 20% of Ulva. Digestibility energy measurements (9.1 MJ kg^-1 DM), organic matter (OM) effective degradability (650 g kg^-1), nitrogen effective degradability in the rumen (497 g kg^-1), rumen ammonia concentration (311 mg L^-1) and excretion of nitrogen in urine (0.91), they all indicated that Ulva could be categorized as a low-energy high-nitrogen foodstuff.

Hansen et al. [9] performed a feeding study with 12 north Ronaldsay sheep (23 kg average weight), for five days. Each sheep was fed ad libitum with Laminaria digitata (L.) Lamouroux and L. hyperborea (Gunnerus); dry matter degradation (71.7%) and organic matter digestibility (79.6%) were measured. These authors concluded that such seaweeds can be used as an alternative feeding source. Marin [13] used 20 sheep (20 kg average weight) for 90 days to evaluate the effect of a diet with 25% of the Sargassum algae on productive parameters of sheep. No differences were found neither in feed intake (991 g d^-1, 992 g d^-1), weight increase (870 g week^-1, 900 g week^-1) nor feed conversion (7.9; 7.7) between the control diet and the diet with Sargassum; but in water consumption (3.8 L d^-1, 4.4 L d^-1) there were.

Particularly for goats Capra hircus, Ventura and Castanon [24] pointed out that U. lactuca represents medium-quality forage for goats, with a high protein content. They evaluated in adult male Canarian goats that the effective rumen degradation was 335 g OM and 96 g CP kg^-1 DM, and the in vitro digestion was 512 g OM and 147 g CP kg^-1 DM. Casas et al. [5] evaluated the nutritive value of Sargassum algae as fed for goats; they worked with 20 female Nubian goats (43 weeks old), for 60 days. After dividing them in two groups of 10, one was fed with a control diet and the other with a supplemented diet with 25% of Sargassum; there were no significant differences between both diets neither in weight increase (8.6 kg, 9 kg), feed intake (1.30 kg d^-1, 1.6 kg d^-1), nor feed conversion rate (11.1; 12.6), but only in water consumption (3.8 L d^-1, 5.1 L d^-1). According to these authors, a diet with 25% of the Sargassum algae is efficient as an alternative feedstuff for goats.

Regarding to M. pyrifera algae, there is only one study which determined the dry matter disappearance in the rumen of 85% at a lapse of 96 h, with an estimated 0.03 degradability rate, in bovine Bos taurus - indicus livestock. Four cross-breeded fistulated zebu bulls, weighing around 600 kg and aging five years old, were used [8].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of Macrocystis pyrifera

The MP algae were harvested by a custom made vessel ship called “El Sargacero”, from beds located off Ensenada, B. C., Mexico. The kelp (MP) was spread on a cement surface and sun-dried for three days, turning them periodically to make this process more efficient. Then the algae were ground in a harmer mill (Herza model L).

Experimental design

The diets utilized were: control diet (0% MP), 10, 20 and 30% of M. pyrifera meal (10% MP, 20% MP and 30% MP). The study was conducted at the city of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico. The weather in this region is typically warm and semi-arid, with a 187.6 mm annual precipitation, a 40-60% average humidity and a 28°C average temperature [6].

The following analyses were carried out to the kelp meal and diets: Dry Matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP) and ether extract (Soxhlet apparatus, Lab-line Instruments Inc. U.S.A.), determined in accordance to the A.O.A.C. [1] methods (Methods: 934.01, 942.05, 955.04 y 920.39, respectively). A conversion factor of 6.25 was used to calculate CP content. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), cellulose, hemicellulose and lignine were analyzed according to the Van Soest method described by Tejada [22], and gross energy by Calorimetric Bomb (Parr Instrument Bomb, Mod. 6300, U.S.A).

Samples of MP meal for mineral analysis were subjected to acid digestion and analyzed through atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Brand GBC, Mod. Avanta PM, Australia) following the procedures described by A.O.A.C. [1].

Four male Nubian goats (mean weight = 42 ± 1.7 kg, 3 years old) fitted with ruminal cannulae (Plastisol 1”; Bar Diamond) were randomly distributed in a replicated 4 x 4 Latin-square design [20] and were kept in metabolic cages. Data were examined by Analysis of Variance and Tukey’s test for a multiple comparisons of means, with a significance level of P<0,05 [20]. All animals were treated with anthelmintics. The experimental protocol was approved by the Scientific Committee of the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur.

Feed (0.600 kg of diet) was provided twice a day at 08:00 and 18:00 hours. Water intake was provided ad libitum. Each one of the four experimental periods comprised 19 days; 14 days for diet-adaptation period, and 5 days for total feces and urine collection. Feed intake (the difference between feed offered and feed refusal) and water intake were recorded daily. In addition, DM, CP and NDF digestibility (total fecal collection) [19] were determined. Water intake was measured with a glass calibrated cylinder. Total faeces and urine were collected daily from each cage and measured, the first were weighed with a balance; the urine was collected in a bottle and measured with a glass calibrated cylinder.

DC = FI – FO x 100

                                                                          FI

Where: DC = digestibility coefficient (%); FI= feed intake (DM basis) and FO= faecal output (DM basis).

Rumen degradability of dry matter for each diet and that for the kelp meal was determined in situ using a nylon bag technique. The nylon bags (12 x 8 cm; pore size = 60 µ) were filled with 5 g for each diet and suspended in the rumen of each goat. The bags were incubated for 3; 6; 9; 12; 24; 30; 36; 48; 72 and 96 hours. Nylon bags with kelp meal (5 g) were incubated during 72 hours. Zero time disappearance was obtained by suspending the nylon bags in a NaCl 0.15 N solution, at 37°C for 5 minutes. Upon removal from the rumen, bags were washed five times during 1 min in a mechanical agitator until obtaining a clear and transparent rising liquid and afterwards, dried at 60°C [10, 21] before determining DM disappearance, which was calculated as follows:

DM (%) = ((WB + WBI) – (WB + WAI)) x 100

                                                                             SW

Where: DM (%)= dry matter disappearance; WB= bag weight; WBI= sample weight prior to incubation; WAI= sample weight after incubation; SW= sample weight.

Data for the in situ digestibility of DM were fitted to the non-linear equation: P = a + b (1–e^{– ct}) [14] using the Neway Excel program, where: P = disappearance at time t; (a + b)= potential degradability; c = rate of degradation. The effective degradation was estimated at different degradation rates (fraction h^-1): 0.02; 0.05 and 0.08.

Ruminal content samples of 150 mL were collected at 0; 3; 6; 9 and 12 h, through the ruminal cannulae, for five days. One portion of the ruminal content was filtered by squeezing out of eight layers of gauze and the pH of the filtrate was recorded immediately using a potentiometer (Orion Mod. 701A, U.S.A.) with a Corning electrode [1]. Ammoniacal nitrogen was determined by the Destilation method [1]. Data were analyzed in triplicates. Ruminal pH and ammoniacal nitrogen data were analyzed as repeated measures [11, 12] using the Statistical Analysis System program [17].

Chemical Proximal Analysis of Diets

The ashes, the nitrogen-free extract and proteins were the main components of MP meal; the minerals found in highest concentrations were Na and K. The variations of the evaluated fractions on each diet are due mainly to the addition of the algae at different concentrations; they are independent to the variations of the ether and crude protein extracts, because these quantities are influenced by the tallow and the urea, which were included to obtain isocaloric and isoproteic diets, respectively. The ashes concentration increased as the kelp concentration was higher, due to their high content of ashes. On the other hand, the concentration of crude fiber decreased because of the substitution of the alfalfa (TABLE I).

TABLE I.  INGREDIENTS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (g 100 g^-1 DM) OF DIETS USED / COMPOSICIÓN E INGREDIENTES DE LAS DIETAS USADAS (g 100 g-1 DM).

¹Chemical composition of the meal of Macrocystis pyrifera (% on DM basis): Moisture: 7.66 ± 0.23, Ash: 38.60 ± 0.28, Proteins: 12.77 ± 0.12, Lipids: 0.22 ± 0.01, Gross energy (Mcal Kg^-1): 2.04 ± 0.73, NDF (Neutro detergent fiber): 19.90 ± 1.00, ADF (Acid detergent fiber): 12.60 ± 0.91, Hemicellulose: 7.30 ± 0.50, Cellulose: 8.60 ± 0.08, Lignin: 3.60 ± 0.20, Na: 48.4 mg g^-1, K: 93.4 mg g^-1, Ca: 15.4 mg g^-1 , Mg 12.9 mg g^-1, Fe: 117. 3 mg kg^-1, Zn: 12.24 mg kg^-1, Mn: 10.5 mg kg^-1, Cu: 1.77 mg kg^-1. 10% MP: diet with 10% of M. pyrifera meal (MP), 20% MP: diet with 20% of MP, 30% MP: diet with 30% of MP and 0% MP: control diet.

In vivo Digestibility of DM

TABLE II.  FEED INTAKE AND IN VIVO DIGESTIBILITY OF THE DIETS/ ALIMENTO CONSUMIDO Y DIGESTIBILIDAD IN VIVO DE LAS DIETAS.

Means of 4 determinations.

*IVDMS: In vivo digestibility of dry matter. 10% MP: Diet with kelp 10%; 20% MP: Diet with kelp 20%; 30% MP: Diet with kelp 30%.

TABLE III. WATER INTAKE AND URINE EXCRETION, DURING THE FOUR SAMPLING PERIODS/ CONSUMO DE AGUA Y ORINA EXCRETADA, DURANTE LOS CUATRO PERIODOS DE MUESTREO.

Same letters at the same column indicate that there was not any significant statistical difference (P>0.05).

10% MP: Diet with kelp 10%; 20% MP: Diet with kelp 20%; 30% MP: Diet with kelp 30%.

In vivo digestibility of DM (P>0.05) showed no significant differences among control diet and diets with MP (TABLE II). The values were greater than those obtained by Marín [13], who used 10, 20 and 30% of the Sargassum algae in diets for lambs and found values of digestibility of 70.1 - 73.4%, as well as the ones obtained by Casas et al. [4], who used diets containing Sargassum in concentrations of 23, 26 and 29% supplied to goats, and obtained digestibility values of 71.2 – 70.0%. The greater digestibility obtained with MP meal is attributed to its higher alginates concentration (32%) a polysaccharide in contrast with the concentration of alginates of Sargassum (14%), and also for the high concentrations of NDF (20%) and ADF (13%).

in situ Digestibility of DM

in situ Digestibility of DM

Results from the in situ digestibility of DM showed a significant difference among the several hours of sampling for each diet (P<0.05). At the 96 hour, the diet with a 10% MP concentration was different from the one with 30% (P<0.05). It is important to point out that at 48 hour, there was 76% degradation in the diet with 30% of kelp, which equals 93% of the total of the in situ digestibility; in the other diets it reached from 86 to 88% (FIG. 1). The highest value found was 82.2% on the diet with 30% MP. These results are higher than those obtained by Casas et al. [4] who found in situ digestibility values of 71.4%. Their diets had a similar composition to those used in this study, but a Sargassum meal was used. Marín [13] in studies performed on ovines, obtained an in situ digestibility value of 66.3% with 30% of Sargassum. The greater values of in situ digestibility found in this work with regards to the ones got by Marin [13] and Casas et al. [4] are attributed to the difference in concentration of alginates in the algae previously mentioned. The values for the same variable, but using alfalfa (80.8%) or corn (79.4%), were similar to those obtained in this study.

The in situ digestibility obtained for the kelp meal was 77% at hour 72, which differs from the values reported by Gojón et al. [8] on bovines (85.4%). This is due to the fact that they measured the algae digestibility after 96 h. Gojón et al. [8] mentioned that the crude protein of this seaweed is not degraded in the rumen, and that in vitro protein degradability results (90%) suggest that these proteins may function as bypass proteins to be digested in the abomasums. If this is considered then the MP digestibility in ruminants is bigger than 77%.

Kinetics of in situ Disappearance of DM

TABLE IV. KINETICS OF IN SITU DISAPPEARANCE OF DRY MATTER FROM EXPERIMENTAL DIETS/ CINETICA DE LA DESAPARICIóN DE MATERIA SECA IN SITU DE LAS DIETAS EXPERIMENTALES.

abc, different letters at each row indicate statistical significant difference (P<0,05).

10% K: diet with 10% of M. pyrifera meal (MP), 20% MP; diet with 20% of MP, 30% MP; diet with 30% of MP and 0% MP: control diet.

The digestion rate or ruminal disappearance of 0.03; 0.02; 0.03 and 0.03 % h^-1 for each one of the diets (P>0.05) (TABLE IV) showed higher ranges than those obtained by Galina et al. [7] who found values of 59.1% at the 0.05 % h^-1 digestion rate, when the effects of slow-intake urea supplementation were evaluated on goat kids pasturing natural Mexican rangeland. Values are also higher than those found when using nine shrubs (15.5 – 54.7%) from Northeast Mexico on sheep [15].

No significant difference was found between the values obtained for potential degradability, with a range between 82.4 and 87.3% (P>0.05) (TABLE IV). This reflects the low percentage of the indigestible fraction on each diet. The highest effective degradation was obtained at a 0.02 h^-1 rate (TABLE IV), because the flow is slower than at 0.05 and 0.08 h^-1. This allows the feed to remain longer time in the rumen and hence to suffer higher degradation and digestion, because of the digestibility results from the retention time.

pH and Ammoniacal Nitrogen Determination

The lowest pH value (6.7 ± 0.14) was recorded on the control diet (P<0.05), compared to the diets with kelp meal (TABLE V). Increase in pH values was observed as the proportion of algae increased on the diet (6.9 ± 0.07), hence favoring a neutral pH. This behavior is related to water intake, which will increase with the concentration of mineral salts supplied by the algae on the diets. Because of the concentration of the alga was higher on the diet, the pH was closer to 7. It is noteworthy to mention that the pH values obtained for each diet favored the replication of cellulolitic bacteria and their metabolic functions, since these bacteria prefer a neutral pH to grow and values lower than 6.0 affect them [16, 25]. The behavior of the pH was similar in each diet, having two decreases right after feeding. These decreases are attributed to the fermentation peaks where the wasting products such as volatile fatty acids (VFA’s), reduce their value of this variable. Marín [13] found that the pH values reduced right after feeding, corresponding to the highest synthesis of VFA’s.

TABLE V. pH VARIATION AMONG TIMES AND DIETS IN THE FOUR SAMPLING PERIODS / VARIACIóN DEL pH ENTRE HORAS Y DIETAS EN LOS CUATRO PERIODOS DE MUESTREO.

Means of 4 determinations.

abc, different letters in the same row indicate statistical significant difference among diets (P<0.05).

ABCDE, different letters in the same column indicate statistical significant difference among times (P<0.05).

10% MP: Diet with kelp 10%; 20% MP: Diet with kelp 20%; 30% MP: Diet with kelp 30%.

Regarding ammoniacal nitrogen, there was no significant difference among diets at different times of sampling (P>0.05) (TABLE VI), but there was among sampling hours in the diet control and diets with 10 and 30% of MP. Even though ammoniacal nitrogen concentration average was 312.6 mg L^-1 in the control diet, this was not significant difference with regards to the diets with MP. The values of ammoniacal nitrogen were between 291 and 234 mg L^-1 on the diets that included the algae. Satter and Slyter [18] stated that a concentration of 50 mg of NH₃-N L^-1 is enough to support a maximum growth rate of ruminal bacteria and that excessively high levels (800 mg L^-1) do not inhibit bacterial growth.

TABLE VI. VARIATION OF AMMONIACAL NITROGEN AMONG TIMES AND DIETS IN THE FOUR SAMPLING PERIODS (mg/L)/ VARIACIÓN DEL NITROGENO AMONIACAL ENTRE HORAS Y DIETAS (mg/L) EN LOS CUATRO PERIODOS DE MUESTREO.

Means of 4 determinations.

abcde, different letters in the same row indicate statistical significant difference among diets (P<0.05).

ABCDE, different letters in the same column indicate statistical significant difference among times (P<0.05).

10% MP: Diet with kelp 10%; 20% MP: Diet with kelp 20%; 30% MP: Diet with kelp 30%.

The results suggest that M. pyrifera may be used in a concentration up to 30%, as an unconventional dietary supplement for goats, without affecting the in vivo digestibility, in situ digestibility and parameters of ruminal fermentation, such as pH and ammoniacal nitrogen.

The highest in situ digestibility (82.2%) was found on the 30% MP diet.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

1. ASSOCIATION OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Analytical Chemists, 17^th Ed. Horwitz, W. (Ed). Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A. Pp. 1, 6, 14-15, 33. 2000.         [ Links ]

2. ARIELI, A.; SKLAN, D.; KISSIL, G. A note on nutritive value of Ulva lactuca for ruminants. Anim. Prod. 53: 329-331. 1993.         [ Links ]

3. CASAS, M.; SERVIERE, E.; LLUCH, D.; MARCOS, R.; AGUILA, R. Effects of climatic change on the harvest of the kelp Macrocystis pyrifera at the Mexican Pacific coast. Bull. Mar. Sci. 73: 445-456. 2003a.         [ Links ]

4. CASAS, M.; HERNÁNDEZ, H.; MARÍN, A.; AGUILA, R.; CARRILLO, S. Use of Sargassum spp. algae as supplement for goats cattle. XIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Nutrición. Acapulco Guerrero, 9-13 Noviembre México. 263 pp. 2003b.         [ Links ]

5. CASAS, M.; HERNÁNDEZ, H.; MARÍN, A.; AGUILA, R.; HERNÁNDEZ, C.J.; SÁNCHEZ, I.; CARRILLO, S. The seaweed Sargassum (Sargassaceae) as tropical alternative for goat’s feeding. Rev. Biol. Trop. 54: 1-10. 2006.         [ Links ]

6. COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL AGUA. Precipitación, Temperatura, Humedad relativa, “Boletín Mensual del Observatorio Meteorológico.” La Paz, B.C.S. México. 46 pp. 2006.         [ Links ]

7. GALINA, M.A.; GUERRERO, M.; PUGA, C.D.; HAENLEIN, G.F.W. Effects of slow-intake urea supplementation on goat kids pasturing natural Mexican rangeland. Small Rumin. Res. 55: 85-95. 2004.         [ Links ]

8. GOJÓN, B.H.H.; SIQUEIROS, D.A.; HERNÁNDEZ, H. In situ ruminal digestibility and degradability of Macrocystis pyrifera and Sargassum spp. in bovine livestock. Cien. Mar. 24: 463-481. 1998.         [ Links ]

9. HANSEN, H.R.; HECTOR, B.L.; FELDMANN, J. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the seaweed diet of North Ronaldsay sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. 105: 21-28. 2003.         [ Links ]

10. HARMON, D.; RICHARDS, C.J. Considerations for gastrointestinal cannulations in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 2248-2255. 1997.         [ Links ]

11. HARRIS, L.E., Métodos para el análisis químico y evaluación biológica de alimentos para animales. Center for Tropical Agricultur, University of Florida, Gainesville. USA, 183 pp. 1970.         [ Links ]

12. JOHNSON, R.A.; WICHERN, D.W. Paired Comparisons and a Repeated Measures Design. Applied Mutivariate Statistical Analysis. 2^nd. Ed. Prentice Hall, Englenweood Clifts, New Jersey, USA. 640 pp. 1990.         [ Links ]

13. MARÍN, A.A. Utilización del alga Sargassum spp. como complemento alimenticio de ganado ovino. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas. I.P.N. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. Tesis de Maestría. 86 pp. 1999.         [ Links ]

14. ORSKOV, E.R.; MCDONALD, L. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen form incubation measurements weighed according to the rate of passage. J. of Agric. Sci. Cambridge. 92: 499-503. 1979.         [ Links ]

15. RAMÍREZ, R.G.; NEIRA, R.R.; LEDEZMA, R.A.; GARIBALDI, C.A. Ruminal digestion characteristics and effective degradability of cell wall of browse species from northeastern Mexico. Small Rumin. Res. 36: 49-55. 2000.         [ Links ]

16. RUSSEL, J.B.; WILSON, D.B. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose al low pH?. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 1503-1509. 1996.         [ Links ]

17. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM INSTITUTE (SAS). SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6. Cary, N.C. 1985.         [ Links ]

18. SATTER, L.D.; SLYTER, L.L. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 32: 199-208. 1974.         [ Links ]

19. SCHNEIDER, B.H.; FLATT, W.P. The evaluation of feed through digestibility experiments. The University of Georgia Press, Athens, 423 pp. 1975.         [ Links ]

20. STEEL, R.G.; TORRIE, J.H. Análisis de la varianza del cuadrado latino. Bioestadística: Principios y Procedimientos. Ed. McGraw-Hill, México, D.F. 622 pp. 1988.         [ Links ]

21. STERN, M.D.; BACH, A.; CALSAMIGLIA, S. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 2256-2276. 1997.         [ Links ]

22. TEJADA, I. H. Manual de laboratorio para análisis de ingredientes utilizados en la alimentación animal. Patronato de Apoyo a la Investigación y Experimentación Pecuaria en México A. L., México, D. F. 714 pp. 1985.         [ Links ]

23. UNDERWOOD, E.J.; SUTTLE, N.F. The Trace Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 3rd Ed. Wallingford, UK, CAB International. 531–533 pp. 1999.         [ Links ]

24. VENTURA, M.R.; CASTANON, J.I.R. The nutritive value of seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for goats. Small Rumin. Res. 29: 325-327. 1998.         [ Links ]

25. WEIMER, P.J. Why don’t ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster?. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 1496-1502. 1996.         [ Links ]

26. YAHAYA, M.S.; TAKAHASI, J.; MATSUOKA, S.; KIBON, A. Effect of supplementary feeding of cotton seed cake on feed intake, water consumption and work output of work bulls in Borno State, Nigeria. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn. 79: 137-143. 1999.         [ Links ] ]]> 1 ASSOCIATION OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS 2000 17th 1, 6, 14-15, 33 2 1993 53 329-331 3 2003 a 73 445-456 4 2003 263 5 2006 54 1-10 6 COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL AGUA 2006 46 7 2004 55 85-95 8 1998 24 463-481 9 2003 105 21-28 10 1997 75 2248-2255 11 1970 Gainesville 183 12 1990 2nd 640 13 1999 86 14 1979 92 499-503 15 2000 36 49-55 16 1996 79 1503-1509 17 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM INSTITUTE 1985 18 1974 32 199-208 19 1975 423 20 1988 622 21 1997 75 2256-2276 22 1985 714 23 1999 3rd 531-533 24 1998 29 325-327 25 1996 79 1496-1502 26 1999 79 137-143