<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0004-0622</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[ALAN]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0004-0622</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0004-06222005000300010</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of gamma irradiation on the microbiological quality of minimally processed vegetables.L.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Avendaño V]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garrido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A05"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233, Associated Professor, Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmaceuticas. ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233 Assistant Professor, Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmaceuticas. ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233 Adjunct Professor, Industrial Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmaceuticas. ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233 Assistant Student, Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmaceuticas. ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Comision Chilena de Energia Nuclear,  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago, Chile ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>287</fpage>
<lpage>292</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0004-06222005000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0004-06222005000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0004-06222005000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The initial microflora of minimally processed celery and cabbage packaged under a modified atmosphere was determined. The samples came from the same producer and were sold in a supermarket chain of Santiago, Chile. Although neither E. coli nor Salmonella spp. were detected, initial total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts were high (&#8805; 105 cfu/g), not meeting in most cases the specifications of the Chilean legislation. The D10 value for two strains of E. coli (ATCC 8739 and a wild type) inoculated as indicator microorganisms was determined. After irradiating with 5 D10 doses (1kGy), the variation of the microbial population and sensory quality during a 7 days storage period at 5ºC was studied. In irradiated celery, a reduction of 4.7 and 3.8 logs for total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts respectively was observed. There was a decrease of 3.8 and 3.6 logs in cabbage for total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts respectively. In both irradiated and non-irradiated vegetables, neither E. coli nor Salmonella spp. were detected. An increase of 1.6 - 1.7 logs in both microbiological parameters in non-irradiated samples was observed during storage. In irradiated products, only celery showed an increase of 1.2 log in total plate count. Both Enterobacteriaceae count in the two vegetables and Total plate count in cabbage presented essentially no variation in time. No significant differences (p &#8805;0.05) were detected in sensory total quality between the control and the irradiated vegetable and between days of storage.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN. Efecto de la radiación gamma en la calidad microbiológica de vegetales minimamente procesados. Se determinó la microflora inicial de apio y repollo minimamente procesado, envasado en atmósfera controlada, proveniente de un proveedor y disponible en una cadena de supermercados de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile. Aunque no se detectó E. coli ni presencia de Salmonella spp, los recuentos de aerobios mesófilos y de enterobacterias fueron elevados (&#8805; 105 ufc/g), sobrepasando en la mayoría de los casos las especificaciones de la legislación chilena. Se determinó el valor D10 para dos cepas de E. coli (ATCC 8739 y una cepa silvestre aislada de vegetales) inoculadas como microorganismos indicadores. Se estudió la variación de la población microbiana y la calidad sensorial, después de irradiar con dosis de 5 D10 (1 kGy), durante un período de almacenamiento de 7 días a 5ºC. En apio irradiado se observó una reducción de 4,7 y 3,8 ciclos logarítmicos en el recuento de aerobios mesófilos y de enterobacterias, respectivamente. En repollo la reducción fue de 3,8 y 3,6 logaritmos para recuento de aerobios mesófilos y enterobacterias, respectivamente. En ambos vegetales irradiados y no irradiados, no se detectó E. coli ni presencia de Salmonella spp. Durante el almacenamiento se observó un aumento de 1,6 - 1,7 logaritmos en ambos parámetros microbiológicos en las muestras no irradiadas. En los productos irradiados solo en apio se observó un aumento de 1,2 logaritmos en el recuento de aerobios mesófilos. En repollo el recuento de aerobios mesófilos se mantuvo sin variación en el tiempo, lo mismo se observó para el recuento de enterobacterias en ambos vegetales. No se detectaron diferencias significativas (p&#8805;0,05) en la calidad sensorial total, entre el control no irradiado y los productos irradiados, ni entre los días de almacenamiento.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[gamma irradiation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[minimally processed vegetables]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Escherichia coli]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cabbage]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[celery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[irradiación gamma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[vegetales minimamente procesados]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Escherichia coli]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[repollo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[apio]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><b><font face="Verdana">Effect of gamma irradiation on the  microbiological quality of minimally processed vegetables.L. </font></b></p>     <p align="center"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">López V<sup>1</sup>., S.  Avendaño V<sup>2</sup>., J. Romero R<sup>3</sup>., S. Garrido<sup>4</sup>, J.  Espinoza<sup>5</sup>, and M. Vargas<sup>6</sup></font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>1</sup> Associated  Professor, Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas.  Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233, Santiago de Chile. E-mail: llopez@uchile.cl </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>2</sup> Assistant  Professor, Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas.  Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233, Santiago de Chile.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>3</sup> Adjunct Professor,  Industrial Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas.  Universidad de Chile. Casilla 233, Santiago de Chile.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>4</sup> Assistant Student,  Food Microbiology. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas. Universidad de  Chile. Casilla 233, Santiago de Chile.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>5,6</sup> Comisión Chilena  de Energía Nuclear, Santiago, Chile </font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">SUMMARY</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The initial microflora of  minimally processed celery and cabbage packaged under a modified atmosphere was  determined. The samples came from the same producer and were sold in a  supermarket chain of Santiago, Chile. Although neither E. coli nor Salmonella  spp. were detected, initial total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts were high  (&#8805; 105 cfu/g), not meeting in most cases the specifications of the Chilean  legislation. The D10 value for two strains of E. coli (ATCC 8739 and a wild type)  inoculated as indicator microorganisms was determined. After irradiating with 5  D10 doses (1kGy), the variation of the microbial population and sensory quality  during a 7 days storage period at 5ºC was studied. In irradiated celery, a  reduction of 4.7 and 3.8 logs for total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts  respectively was observed. There was a decrease of 3.8 and 3.6 logs in cabbage  for total plate and Enterobacteriaceae counts respectively. In both irradiated  and non-irradiated vegetables, neither E. coli nor Salmonella spp. were detected.  An increase of 1.6 – 1.7 logs in both microbiological parameters in non-irradiated  samples was observed during storage. In irradiated products, only celery showed  an increase of 1.2 log in total plate count. Both Enterobacteriaceae count in  the two vegetables and Total plate count in cabbage presented essentially no  variation in time. No significant differences (p &#8805;0.05) were detected in sensory  total quality between the control and the irradiated vegetable and between days  of storage. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b> gamma  irradiation; minimally processed vegetables; Escherichia coli, cabbage, celery.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMEN.</b> Efecto de la  radiación gamma en la calidad microbiológica de vegetales minimamente  procesados. Se determinó la microflora inicial de apio y repollo minimamente  procesado, envasado en atmósfera controlada, proveniente de un proveedor y  disponible en una cadena de supermercados de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile.  Aunque no se detectó E. coli ni presencia de Salmonella spp, los recuentos de  aerobios mesófilos y de enterobacterias fueron elevados (&#8805; 105 ufc/g),  sobrepasando en la mayoría de los casos las especificaciones de la legislación  chilena. Se determinó el valor D10 para dos cepas de E. coli (ATCC 8739 y una  cepa silvestre aislada de vegetales) inoculadas como microorganismos  indicadores. Se estudió la variación de la población microbiana y la calidad  sensorial, después de irradiar con dosis de 5 D10 (1 kGy), durante un período de  almacenamiento de 7 días a 5ºC. En apio irradiado se observó una reducción de  4,7 y 3,8 ciclos logarítmicos en el recuento de aerobios mesófilos y de  enterobacterias, respectivamente. En repollo la reducción fue de 3,8 y 3,6  logaritmos para recuento de aerobios mesófilos y enterobacterias,  respectivamente. En ambos vegetales irradiados y no irradiados, no se detectó E.  coli ni presencia de Salmonella spp. Durante el almacenamiento se observó un  aumento de 1,6 – 1,7 logaritmos en ambos parámetros microbiológicos en las  muestras no irradiadas. En los productos irradiados solo en apio se observó un  aumento de 1,2 logaritmos en el recuento de aerobios mesófilos. En repollo el  recuento de aerobios mesófilos se mantuvo sin variación en el tiempo, lo mismo  se observó para el recuento de enterobacterias en ambos vegetales. No se  detectaron diferencias significativas (p&#8805;0,05) en la calidad sensorial total,  entre el control no irradiado y los productos irradiados, ni entre los días de  almacenamiento. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Palabras claves:</b>  irradiación gamma; vegetales minimamente procesados; Escherichia coli, repollo,  apio.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Recibido: </b>18-05-2005 <b>&nbsp;Aceptado: </b>31-08-2005</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Introduction</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Microbiological quality is an  important factor to consider in the quality concept of a food product. Normally,  fruits and vegetables carry a non-pathogenic epiphytic microflora. However,  there are certain factors contributing to the microbiological contamination of  these products with pathogens. Contamination may arise as a consequence of  treating soil with organic fertilizers such as manure and sewage sludge and from  irrigation water. Additionally, the application of technologies such as cutting,  slicing, skinning and shredding remove the natural protective barriers of the  intact plant, likely providing a suitable medium for the growth of contaminating  microorganisms. Some of these microorganisms are capable of growing on whole,  minimally processed or cut fruits and vegetables under routine handling and  storage conditions. Outbreaks of human diseases associated with the consumption  of raw vegetables and fruits often occur in developing countries and have become  more frequent in developed countries over the past decade (1, 2). </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">For fresh-cut vegetables that  are eaten raw, none of the currently used treatments may be relied on to  substantially reduce the number of contaminating microorganisms occurring during  some of the steps of the food chain, such as harvest, transportation, storage,  distribution and handling before consumption. Washing with antimicrobial  compounds, while important, often brings about only a relatively small reduction.&nbsp; </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Eliminating the risks is  difficult. Managing them is based on identifying and controlling those factors  that are important in preventing contamination or limiting growth of pathogenic  microorganisms between farm and plate (1, 2, 3).Nowadays, the food market offers  a great variety of minimally processed vegetables. Nevertheless, the elaboration  process does not always reduce the presence of spoilage and/or pathogenic  microorganisms to an adequate level. In Chile, the label in these products  specifies that they are ready-to-eat, not needing a previous treatment such as  washing, disinfecting, or cooking.     <br> According to several studies, the application of ionizing irradiation is a  promising technology that may be used to control spoilage and pathogenic  microorganisms in order to increase shelf life, improve the safety of ready-to-eat  fruits and vegetables and as a substitute for the use of decontaminating  chemicals (4, 5, 6, 7). </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Considering that, in order to  accept a chemical product as a sanitizing agent, it is necessary that the  compound kill 99.999% of a certain microorganism population (8), when using  gamma radiation a 5 log reduction would be desired, that means irradiation with  a 5 D10 dose.     <br> The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irradiation on the  microbiological and sensory quality, and changes occurring during the storage  under refrigerated conditions of minimally processed celery (Apium graveolens  var dulce), and cabbage (Brassica oleraceae var capitata ). An irradiation dose  corresponding to 5 D10 for two E. coli strains inoculated as indicator  microorganism in the vegetables was used.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Materials and Methods</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Materials</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Samples from minimally  processed celery and cabbage were obtained from a supermarket in Santiago,  Chile. Celery was presented in slices and cabbage was finely shredded. Both  vegetables came from the same producer, harvested from a single source. The  vegetables were sanitized using sodium hypochlorite and packaged in polyethylene  bags under nitrogen atmosphere. The date of purchase was the same day the  products were delivered to the market. Shelf life data printed on the package  was 8 days, when stored at 5ºC.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Methods</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Microbiological quality of  the products. </font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In order to obtain the  indigenous micro flora of the selected products, a previous study was carried  out. Twelve samples of each product, purchased 4 at a time at different dates,  were analyzed, determining Total plate count (TPC), Enterobacteriaceae count (Ent),  Most Probable Number of E. coli (MPN) and detection of Salmonella spp. in 25 g  (Sal). TPC, MPN and Sal were carried out according to Bacteriological Analytical  Manual (9) and Ent according to ISO 7402, (10).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Dosimetry study </font></b> </p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">According to ASTM D 2954-71  (11), dosimetry was conducted for each vegetable in an experimental irradiator  BPCDI Nº3 (Brookhaven Portable Cesium Development Irradiator) provided with a  Cs137 source. The source’s activity was 53,430 Ci (1.98 x 1015 Bq) and the dose  rate was 0.44 Gy /sec. Ferrous-sulfate cupric-sulfate dosimeters were prepared  to measure the absorbed doses.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Determination of D<sub>10 </sub>value for E. coli </font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Preparation of the inocula</font></b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Two strains of E. coli were  used, an ATCC 8739 and a wild type, previously isolated by the authors from  vegetables purchased at the local market. The cultures were grown at 35ºC for 24  h in Tryptic Soy Broth (Oxoid) to a concentration of 109 colony forming units (cfu)  /ml, then diluted with 0,1% peptone water (pH 7) and used to contaminate the  vegetables so as to obtain 105 – 106 cfu/g. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Inoculation </font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">To inoculate the samples, 100 g  of each pre-cut vegetable, disinfected by irradiating with a 25 kGy dose, were  introduced in a sterile flask containing 1 liter of the diluted culture  suspension and shaken for 5 min. The liquid was withdrawn through a sterile  plastic bag with holes. Aseptically, 5 samples of 10 g of each vegetable were  weighed, packaged in sterilized bags and sealed.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Irradiation </font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Samples of each vegetable were  irradiated with 0.5 kGy, 1.0 kGy, 1.5 kGy and 2.0 kGy. Non-irradiated samples  were kept as control. After the irradiation, the 10 g samples were homogenized  with 90 ml of 0.1% peptone water (pH 7) in a Stomacher (Lab Blender Stomacher  400. Type BA 7021. Seward, London) for 1 min at normal speed (200 paddles/min).  Considering that the study was performed with pure cultures of both strains, E.  coli count was carried out plating 1 ml decimal aliquots into Petri dishes and  pouring Tryptic Soy Agar (Oxoid). Plates were incubated at 35ºC for 24 – 48 h  before counting. D<sub>10</sub> value was calculated using the mean of 3  replicates of the experience for each vegetable.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Effect of a 5 D<sub>10</sub>  dose and changes occurring during the refrigerated storage of non-inoculated  vegetables</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Aseptically, 25 g for the Sal  determination and 10 g for TPC, Ent and MPN controls from each vegetable were  weighed, packaged in sterilized bags and sealed. All non-inoculated samples were  irradiated with the 5 D10 dose. Non-irradiated products were kept as control.  The products were assessed after the irradiation (T0) and during storage at 5ºC  for up to 7 days, controlling at 2, 5 and 7 days. The experience was replicated  4 times for each vegetable. Means and standard errors were calculated from a  commercial spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and  Duncan Test (5% level) using Statgraphics 5.1.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Sensory evaluation </b> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The total sensory quality, that  is, the evaluation of texture, visual, odor and flavor attributes of the  irradiated and non-irradiated samples, were evaluated by using the Scoring  method with a scale from 1 (I dislike it extremely) to 9 (I like it extremely)  points. The evaluation was carried out by 6 panelists. The training of the  panelists was developed by presenting them with vegetal samples having different  degrees of sensory damage, in order to obtain experience and the ability to  objectively differentiate amongst the 9 points of the used scale.&nbsp; The  evaluation of the refrigerated stored samples was carried out on days 1, 4 and 7  after irradiating with a 5 D10 dose. Samples were presented to the panelists in  a tray containing two dishes with 20 g of the vegetable, one corresponding to  the irradiated sample and the other to the non-irradiated control. Dishes were  randomly codified. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Two replicates at different  dates were carried out. Data was analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan Test (5% level)  using Statgraphics 5.1.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Results and discussion</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Microbiological quality of  the original products</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Results of the microbiological  analysis of celery and cabbage are presented in <a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a> respectively.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="fig1"></a></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Figure1.</b> Microbiological  analysis of celery samples (</font><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">&#9632;</span><font face="Verdana" size="2">)  Total plate count, (&#9633;) Enterobacteriaceae count</font></p>     <p align="center"> <img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v55n3/art10.fig1.gif" align="center"></p>     
<p align="left"><a name="fig2"></a></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Figure 2. </b>Microbiological  analysis of cabbage samples (</font><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">&#9632;</span><font face="Verdana" size="2">)  Total plate count, (&#9633;) Enterobacteriaceae count</font></p>     <p align="center"> <img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v55n3/art10.fig2.gif" align="center"></p>     
<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Although the presence of no E.  coli or Salmonella spp. was detected, and considering that these are minimally  processed vegetables, the observed initial contamination for TPC and Ent is high.  Total plate counts over 6.0 log cfu/g were observed in 75% and 58% of the celery  and cabbage samples respectively. Prakash et al. (12) reported aerobic counts of  6.57 (log cfu/g) in diced celery, Farkas et al. (13) found levels of 6.0 (log  cfu/g) for total plate counts in pre-cut carrots. The Enterobacteriaceae counts  were higher than 5.0 log cfu/g in 58% and 17% of celery and cabbage respectively.  Farkas et al. (13) reported counts of this bacterial group in fresh carrots,  which agrees with the results mentioned in the present study. It is necessary to  consider that in the cited literature, findings were obtained from fresh  vegetables, that is, neither with a previous treatment nor minimally processed  products like the ones used in this work. </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The label on the products used  for the present study states: &quot;open and eat, no washing or disinfecting needed&quot;.  This means that the consumption of these vegetables could be a potential risk  for sensitive people such as the young, the old, the pregnant and the  immunocompromised consumers (2). The observed microbial levels were detected in  samples purchased close to the packing day. These levels are likely to increase  after 8 days of refrigerated storage, recommended as expiration date. </font> </p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Considering these minimally  processed vegetables as ready-to-eat products, the microbiological limits  specified by the Chilean legislation (14) are n=5, c=1, m= 4.7 log cfu/g and  M=5.7 log cfu/g for TPC and n=5, c=1, m=3.0 log cfu/g and M=4.0 log cfu/g for  Ent. Based on the M value for TPC, only 2 celery samples (17%) and 4 cabbage  samples (33%) meet the recommended limits. Regarding the Enterobacteriaceae  count, 2 samples (17%) of each product are within the suggested limit. No  international data regarding this kind of microbiological parameters for ready-to-eat  minimally processed vegetables were found.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Dosimetry study</font></b></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Dosimetry measurements  indicated that a good homogeneity in the mean absorbed dose was obtained, that  is, the uniformity rate of the irradiation process. Values of 1.11 and 1.16 for  celery and cabbage respectively were calculated. </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Determination of D<sub>10</sub>  value for E. coli</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The D<sub>10</sub> values  obtained for both strains (ATCC and wild) in celery and cabbage are shown in <a href="#tab1">Table 1.</a></font></p>     <p align="justify"><a name="tab1"></a></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Table 1.</b> D<sub>10</sub>  values (kGy) for E. coli inoculated in minimally processed celery and cabbage</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Vegetable&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  ATCC&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; strain Wild  strain</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Celery&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  0.18 ± 0.011&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.22 ± 0.03 </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Cabbage&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  0.22 ± 0.03&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.23 ± 0.01</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>1</sup> mean from 3 trials  ± standard deviation. No statistically significant differences were found  (p&#8805;0.05)</font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">E. coli was chosen as an indicator  microorganism in order to know the behavior, when irradiating, of the natural  microflora in this kind of vegetable products. The study of the D<sub>10</sub>  value for two different strains of the microorganism (a wild and an ATCC strain)  was carried out in order to determine the 5 D<sub>10 </sub>dose used for the  irradiation of the samples. In both vegetables, the D<sub>10</sub> values  calculated for the ATCC strain are lightly lower than the one obtained for the  wild strain. For cabbage, the values obtained for both strains were lightly  higher than the one calculated for celery. However, no statistically significant  differences between both strains and vegetables were found (p&#8805;0.05).</font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Although no literature data for D<sub>10</sub>  values were found regarding minimally processed vegetables inoculated with this  microorganism, a comparison between results in other matrices will be considered.  D<sub>10</sub> values of 0.2 kGy and 0.25 - 0.5 kGy for E. coli were reported by  Garbutt (15) and Adams and Moss (16) respectively, although no further details  on food matrices and bacterial strain are given. Doyle (17) presents values of  0.23 – 0.35 kGy when inoculating in fresh foods of animal origin. Studies with a  O157:H7 strain showed results of 0.27 kGy, 0.24 – 0.27 kGy and 0.24 kGy in  poultry, fresh foods and meat respectively (5, 17, 18). ICMSF (19) reports  different values for ground poultry and ground meat that range between 0.241 and  0.39 kGy, using wild and O157:H7 strains. The radiation source, gaseous phase  and temperature are detailed. According to this literature data, the results  found in this study could be considered within the range of reported D<sub>10 </sub>for E. coli. </font></p>     <p align="left"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Effect of the 5 D<sub>10</sub>  dose</font></b></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">According to the obtained D<sub>10</sub>  values, the 5 D<sub>10 </sub>irradiation dose that should be used for the  experience would be 0.90 kGy and 1.10 kGy for the ATCC and wild strains in  celery respectively, and 1.10 kGy and 1.15 kGy for the ATCC and wild strain in  cabbage respectively. Considering the application of this irradiation treatment  at industrial level, and the fact there were no statistically significant&nbsp;  differences in the calculated D<sub>10</sub> values between both strains and the  vegetables, a dose of 1.0 kGy was used for the irradiation of all samples.</font></p>     <p align="left"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Irradiation effect on  microbiological counts</font></b></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a href="#fig3">Figures 3</a> and <a href="#fig4">4 </a>present the results of the irradiation effect and the  variation of microbiological counts (log cfu/g) of the products during storage  at 5ºC.</font></p>     <p align="left"><a name="fig3"></a></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Figure 3.</b> Effect of  radiation and changes in TPC and Ent counts in celery during refrigerated  storage. (&#9679;) TPC and (</font><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">&#9632;</span><font face="Verdana" size="2">)  Ent Control (non-irradiated), (&#9675;) TPC 1.0 kGy, (&#9633;) Ent 1.0 kGy. Error bars  indicate standard deviation. </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"> <img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v55n3/art10.fig3.gif" align="center"></p>     
<p align="left"><a name="fig4"></a></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Figure 4</b>. Effect of  radiation and changes in TPC and Ent counts in cabbage during refrigerated  storage. (&#9679;) TPC and (</font><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">&#9632;</span><font face="Verdana" size="2">)  Ent Control (non-irradiated), (&#9675;) TPC 1.0 kGy, (&#9633;) Ent 1.0 kGy. Error bars  indicate standard deviation.</font></p>     <p align="center"> <img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/alan/v55n3/art10.fig4.gif" align="center"></p>     
<p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Initial total plate and  Enterobacteriaceae counts are similar to those obtained in the preliminary study.  No E. coli or Salmonella spp. during the studied period were detected. After  irradiation, a 4.7 and a 3.8 log reduction in TPC and Ent respectively was  observed in celery. Prakash et al. (12) reported a reduction of 4.6 logs in the  aerobic microorganisms count, after irradiating diced celery with 1 kGy. The  effect of the 1 kGy dose was lower in cabbage; the reduction was of 3.8 and 3.6  logs in TPC and Ent respectively. A 3.5 and 4.0 log reduction irradiating  carrots cubes with the same dose was achieved by Farkas et al (13), in TPC and  Ent respectively. </font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The population of TPC on the non-irradiated  samples increased during storage. At the end of the study, changes of 1.6 and  1.7 logs were observed in celery and cabbage respectively. Other authors  reported an increase of 2.4 logs in diced celery on the 8th storage day; 2.5  logs in fresh pre-cut sliced bell peppers at day 7 and 2.0 logs in cut romaine  lettuce packaged under modified atmosphere, at day 11 (13, 12, 20). At day 7,  Enterobacteriaceae counts increased in 1.7 and 1.6 logs in celery and cabbage  respectively. Values informed by Farkas (13) in sliced bell peppers showed an  increase of nearly 3 logs. Statistically significant differences (p&#8804;0.05) were  found between day 0 and days 2, 5 and 7 for both microbiological parameters.  Comparing these results may give a trend of the behavior of the microbial  population, but the kind of vegetable studied, the treatment or preparation of  the samples, the type of the indigenous microflora and storage time must be  considered. </font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">During the storage of the  irradiated samples, the increase of the surviving flora was lower than the  obtained in the non-irradiated products. In general, TPC and Ent counts remained  essentially stable during storage of both products. The higher count at day 7  was observed in celery, where TPC was 1.2 log higher than the result obtained at  the initial day. Prakash et al. (12) reported variation in TPC of 1.9 log after  8 days at 5ºC, in diced celery irradiated with 1 kGy. No statistically  significant differences (p&#8805;0.05) were found between day 0 and days 2, 5 and 7  for both microbiological parameters. The colony’s characteristics obtained from  the irradiated samples presented a great variety between the replicate samples,  which may be due to a non homogeneous microflora of the initial products. This  could depend on a non-standardized process or treatment during the elaboration  of the minimally processed products and/or different culture conditions of the  vegetable. It is possible to point out that when irradiating with a 1 kGy dose,  an important reduction of the initial microflora can be achieved. Moreover,  these levels of contamination could be maintained during storage within the  microbiological limits recommended by the Chilean legislation, which is not  achieved with the non-irradiated samples. </font></p>     <p align="left"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Sensory evaluation</font></b></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>  presents a comparison of the results for total sensory quality, between the non-irradiated  samples and the irradiated vegetables during the refrigerated storage. No  significant differences (p &#8805;0.05) were observed between the non-irradiated and  the irradiated samples, and between days of refrigerated storage. According to  the obtained results, the panelists were unable to distinguish significant  changes in the total quality of each vegetable. At the end of the storage period,  the score obtained for irradiated celery was 5.3 (&quot;I like it a little&quot;) and 6.8  (&quot;I like it more or less&quot;) for cabbage. In both cases, the acceptability at day  7 was better for the irradiated samples when comparing with the scores obtained  for the not irradiated vegetables. The score considered as a limit for  acceptability was 3 (I dislike it a little). Clark (6) reported that irradiation  of whole fruits and vegetables was not successful, because many products have a  low tolerance for radiation and develop skin damage and internal browning;  however, fresh cut products do not exhibit these reactions. The vegetables used  in the present study can be considered as fresh cut products, agreeing with the  statement cited above.</font></p>     <p align="left"><a name="tab2"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Table 2.</b> Total sensory  quality of celery and cabbage (non-irradiated and irradiated) during the  refrigerated storage using</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">scoring method with a 1 to 9  points scale </font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Days&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Celery&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Cabbage</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Non irradiated&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.0 kGy&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Non irradiated&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  1.0 kGy </font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  6.2 ± 0.90<sup>2</sup>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 6.7 ±  0.90&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  7.0 ± 0.21&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  6.7 ± 0.21</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">4&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  6.0 ± 0.48&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 5.7 ±  0.48&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  6.5 ± 0.57&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 5.2  ± 0.57</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  4.5 ± 0.49&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 5.3 ±  0.49&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  5.7 ± 0.59&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 6.8  ± 0.59</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>1 </sup>1 = I dislike it  extremely, 9 = I like it extremely</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>2</sup> mean from 2 trials  and scores obtained from 6 panelists ± standard deviation. </font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">As a conclusion to the present  study, it is necessary to point out the high levels of total plate and  Enterobacteriaceae counts detected in these samples of minimally processed  celery and cabbage from the Chilean market. Irradiation with a 1 kGy doses  reduced this contamination to acceptable levels without changing the  acceptability of the samples during the recommended shelf life. The remaining  microflora in the irradiated products does not show a significant increase  during the refrigerated storage recommended by the producer. Irradiation of this  kind of ready-to-eat products is a feasible alternative treatment to be  considered in order to improve the microbiological quality without affecting the  sensory attributes and to extend the shelf life of the products.&nbsp; </font> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Acknowledgments </b></font></p>     <p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">This research was supported by the  FAO/IAEA – Co-ordinated Research Project – CHI 11902</font></p>     <p align="left"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">References </font></b></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">1. Beuchat L. Surface  decontamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw: a review. Food Safety Issues,  Food Safety Unit, World Health Organization; 1998. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461830&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">2. European Commission. Health &amp;  Consumer Protection Directorate General. Risk Profile on the Microbiological  Contamination of Fruits and Vegetables Eaten Raw; 2002 URL:  http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/index_en.html</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461831&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">3. Food Safety &amp; Hygiene. A  bulletin for the Australian Food Industry. Packaged minimally processed fresh-cut  vegetables; 2000 URL: http://www.dfst.csiro.au/fshbull/fshbull21.htm</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461832&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">4. Thayer D. and Rajkowski K.  Developments in irradiation of fresh fruits and vegetables. Food Tech 1999;  53(11):62-65.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461833&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">5. Federighi M. and Tholozan J.L.  Traitments ionisants et hautes pressions des aliments. Paris: Ed. Economica;  2001. p. 59. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461834&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">6. Clark P. Extending the Shelf  Life of Fruits and Vegetables. Food Techn 2002; 56(4):98-106.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461835&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">7. FAO/OIEA/OPS. Consulta Técnica  Conjunta sobre el uso de Irradiación como medida de intervención en Salud  Pública para el control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Alimentos, Washington,  D.C. Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica, Viena; 1992.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461836&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">8. Ayres J.C., Mundt J.O and  Sandine W.E. Microbiology of foods. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company;  1980. p. 131.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461837&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">9. Food and Drug Administration.  Bacteriological Analytical Manual on line; 2001. URL:  http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-toc.html</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461838&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">10. ISO 7402:1993 (E).  Microbiology – General guidance for the enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae  without resuscitation – MPN technique and colony-count technique. 1993.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461839&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">11. ASTM D2954-71. Standard Test  Methods for Absorbed Gamma and Electron Radiation Dose with the Ferrous Sulfate  – Cupric Sulfate Dosimeter. ASTM, Philadelphia, P.A.; 1977.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461840&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">12. Prakash A., Inthajak P.,  Huibregtse F., Caporaso F. and Foley D.M. Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation  and Conventional Treatments on Shelf Life and Quality Characteristics of Diced  Celery. J Food Sci 2000a; 65(6):1070-1075. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461841&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">13. Farkas J., Sáray T., Mohásci-Farkas  C., Horti K. and Andrássy E. Effects of Low-dose Gamma Radiation on Shelf-life  and Microbiological Safety of Pre-cut/Prepared Vegetables. Advances in Food  Science 1997; 19(3/4):111-119.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461842&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">14. Ministry of Health. Nuevo  Reglamento Sanitario de los Alimentos. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Publiley;  2000. p. 89. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461843&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">15. Garbutt J., Essentials of Food  Microbiology. London: Ed. Arnold; 1997. p. 113. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461844&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">16. Adams M.R., Moss M.O. Food  Microbiology. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1995. p. 76. </font> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461845&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">17. Doyle M., Beuchat L. and  Montville T. Microbiología de los Alimentos. Fundamentos y Fronteras. Zaragoza:  Ed. Acribia; 1997. p. 533.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461846&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">18. Olsson D.G. Irradiation of  food. IFT Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition. Food Tech 1998;  52(1):56-62.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461847&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">19. International Commission on  Microbiological Specifications for Foods, ICMSF. Microbiological Specifications  of Food Pathogens. London: Published by Blackie Academic &amp; Professional; 1996.  p. 135.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461848&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="left"><font face="Verdana" size="2">20. Prakash A., Guner A., Caporaso  F. and Foley D. Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation on the Shelf Life and  Quality Characteristics of cut Romaine Lettuce Packaged under Modified  Atmosphere. J. Food Sci 2000b; 65(3):549-553.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=461849&pid=S0004-0622200500030001000020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beuchat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surface decontamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw: a review.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Food Safety Issues, Food Safety Unit, World Health Organization]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Risk Profile on the Microbiological Contamination of Fruits and Vegetables Eaten Raw]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Commission. Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Packaged minimally processed fresh-cut vegetables]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Food Safety & Hygiene. A bulletin for the Australian Food Industry]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rajkowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Developments in irradiation of fresh fruits and vegetables.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Tech]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>62-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Federighi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tholozan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Traitments ionisants et hautes pressions des aliments.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<edition>Economica</edition>
<page-range>59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark  ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Extending the Shelf Life of Fruits and Vegetables.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Techn.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>98-106</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Consulta Técnica Conjunta sobre el uso de Irradiación como medida de intervención en Salud Pública para el control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Alimentos]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington^eD.C D.C]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica, Viena]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mundt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Microbiology of foods]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<page-range>131</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco^eW. H W. H]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Freeman and Company]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Bacteriological Analytical Manual on line]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Food and Drug Administration]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[(E). Microbiology - General guidance for the enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae without resuscitation - MPN technique and colony-count technique]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Standard Test Methods for Absorbed Gamma and Electron Radiation Dose with the Ferrous Sulfate - Cupric Sulfate Dosimeter.]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Philadelphia^eP.A P.A]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASTM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prakash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Inthajak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huibregtse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caporaso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation and Conventional Treatments on Shelf Life and Quality Characteristics of Diced Celery.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Food Sci]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>65</volume><volume>6</volume>
<page-range>1070-1075</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farkas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sáray]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohásci-Farkas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andrássy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of Low-dose Gamma Radiation on Shelf-life and Microbiological Safety of Pre-cut/Prepared Vegetables.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Advances in Food Science]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>3/4</numero>
<issue>3/4</issue>
<page-range>111-119</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Ministry of Health. Nuevo Reglamento Sanitario de los Alimentos]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<edition>Publiley</edition>
<page-range>89</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garbutt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Essentials of Food Microbiology.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<edition>Arnold</edition>
<page-range>113</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eLondon London]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Food Microbiology]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<page-range>76</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Royal Society of Chemistry]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doyle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beuchat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montville]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Microbiología de los Alimentos. Fundamentos y Fronteras]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<edition>Acribia</edition>
<page-range>533</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Zaragoza ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Irradiation of food. IFT Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Tech]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>56-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Food</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Microbiological Specifications of Food Pathogens.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>135</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eLondon London]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Published by Blackie Academic & Professional]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prakash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caporaso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation on the Shelf Life and Quality Characteristics of cut Romaine Lettuce Packaged under Modified Atmosphere.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Food Sci]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>549-553</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
