<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0378-1844</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Interciencia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[INCI]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0378-1844</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASOCIACIÓN INTERCIENCIA]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0378-18442008000300011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic stability of solanum tuberosum l. Cv: Désirée plantlets obtained from embryogenic cell suspension cultures]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[estabilidad genética de plántulas de PAPA Solanum tuberosum L. cv: Désirée obtenidas a partir del cultivo de células embriogénicas en suspensión]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Estabilidade genética de plântulas de solanum tuberosum l. Cv: Désirée obtidas a partir do cultivo de células embriogênicas em suspensão]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa Edith]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nereida]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vidal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María del Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oropeza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eva]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A05"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,UCV  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Venezuela</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,UCV  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Venezuela</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,UCV  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Venezuela</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,UCV  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Caracas ]]></addr-line>
<country>Venezuela</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>213</fpage>
<lpage>218</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0378-18442008000300011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0378-18442008000300011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0378-18442008000300011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The genetic stability of Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Désirée plantlets obtained from embryogenic cell suspension cultures that were induced from mixoploidy calli tissue with abundant binucleated cells was analyzed. Plants regenerated from these tissues showed an euploid number of chromosomes (2n=4x=48). This result indicates that in this system, euploid cells were selected to go through a somatic embryogenesis process and plant regeneration. Genotype stability of the regenerated plants was screened by RAPD analysis. The results indicated that the new plant population was highly homogeneous]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se analizó la estabilidad genética de plántulas de Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Désirée obtenidas a partir del cultivo de células embriogénicas en suspensión, las que fueron inducidas a partir de callos mixoploides con abundantes células binucleadas. Las plantas regeneradas a partir de estos tejidos presentaron un número euploide de cromosomas (2n=4x=48). Este resultado indica que en este sistema las células euploides fueron seleccionadas para seguir el proceso de embryogenesis somática y regeneración de plantas. La estabilidad genotípica de las plantas regeneradas fue evaluada mediante marcadores RAPD. Los resultados indican que las nuevas poblaciones de plantas son altamente homogéneas]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Analisou-se a estabilidade genética de plântulas de Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Désirée obtidas a partir do cultivo de células embriogênicas em suspensão, as que foram induzidas a partir de calos com ploidia mista com abundantes células binucleadas. As plantas regeneradas a partir de estes tecidos apresentaram um número euplóide de cromossomos (2n=4x=48). Este resultado indica que neste sistema as células euplóides foram selecionadas para seguir o processo de embriogênese somática e regeneração de plantas. A estabilidade genotípica das plantas regeneradas foi avaliada mediante marcadores RAPD. Os resultados indicam que as novas populações de plantas são altamente homogêneas]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cell Suspension Cultures]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Genetic Stability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Regeneration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Solanum tuberosum]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Somatic Embryogenesis]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="3"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US">Genetic stability of <i>solanum tuberosum</i> l. Cv. Désirée plantlets obtained from embryogenic cell suspension cultures</span><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US">.</span></span></font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Teresa Edith Vargas, Nereida Xena, Mar&iacute;a del Carmen Vidal, Maira Oropeza and Eva de Garc&iacute;a</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Teresa Edith Vargas</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Biologist and D.Sc. Universidad Central de Venezuela, (UCV), Venezuela. Research Assistant and Professor UCV, Venezuela.</font></P> <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Nereida Xena</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Doctor, Universit&eacute; de Montpellier, France. Professor UCV, Venezuela.</font></P> <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mar&iacute;a del Carmen Vidal</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Biologist and D.Sc. UCV, Venezuela. Professor, Universidad Nacional Experimental Sim&oacute;n Rodr&iacute;guez.</font></P> <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Maira Oropeza</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Biologist and D.Sc. UCV, Venezuela. Professor UCV, Venezuela.</font></P> <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Eva de Garc&iacute;a</font></B><font face="Verdana" size="2">. Biologist, UCV, Venezuela. M.Sc., University of Wisconsin, USA. D.Sc. in Botany, UCV, Venezuela. Professor, UCV, Venezuela. Address: Apartado 47114. Caracas 1041, Venezuela. e-mail: egarcia@reacciun.ve.</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">SUMMARY</font></b></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The genetic stability of Solanum tuberosum L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e plantlets obtained from embryogenic cell suspension cultures that were induced from mixoploidy calli tissue with abundant binucleated cells was analyzed. Plants regenerated from these tissues showed an euploid number of chromosomes (2n=4x=48). This result indicates that in this system, euploid cells were selected to go through a somatic embryogenesis process and plant regeneration. Genotype stability of the regenerated plants was screened by RAPD analysis. The results indicated that the new plant population was highly homogeneous.</font></P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>estabilidad gen&eacute;tica de pl&aacute;ntulas de PAPA <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e obtenidas a partir del cultivo de c&eacute;lulas embriog&eacute;nicas en suspensi&oacute;n</b></font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">RESUMEN</font></b></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Se analiz&oacute; la estabilidad gen&eacute;tica de pl&aacute;ntulas de Solanum tuberosum L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e obtenidas a partir del cultivo de c&eacute;lulas embriog&eacute;nicas en suspensi&oacute;n, las que fueron inducidas a partir de callos mixoploides con abundantes c&eacute;lulas binucleadas. Las plantas regeneradas a partir de estos tejidos presentaron un n&uacute;mero euploide de cromosomas (2n=4x=48). Este resultado indica que en este sistema las c&eacute;lulas euploides fueron seleccionadas para seguir el proceso de embryogenesis som&aacute;tica y regeneraci&oacute;n de plantas. La estabilidad genot&iacute;pica de las plantas regeneradas fue evaluada mediante marcadores RAPD. Los resultados indican que las nuevas poblaciones de plantas son altamente homog&eacute;neas.</font></P>      <p style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Estabilidade genética de plântulas de <i>solanum tuberosum</i> l. Cv. Désirée obtidas a partir do cultivo de células embriogênicas em suspensão</font></b></p>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">RESUMO</font></b></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Analisou-se a estabilidade gen&eacute;tica de pl&acirc;ntulas de Solanum tuberosum L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e obtidas a partir do cultivo de c&eacute;lulas embriog&ecirc;nicas em suspens&atilde;o, as que foram induzidas a partir de calos com ploidia mista com abundantes c&eacute;lulas binucleadas. As plantas regeneradas a partir de estes tecidos apresentaram um n&uacute;mero eupl&oacute;ide de cromossomos (2n=4x=48). Este resultado indica que neste sistema as c&eacute;lulas eupl&oacute;ides foram selecionadas para seguir o processo de embriog&ecirc;nese som&aacute;tica e regenera&ccedil;&atilde;o de plantas. A estabilidade genot&iacute;pica das plantas regeneradas foi avaliada mediante marcadores RAPD. Os resultados indicam que as novas popula&ccedil;&otilde;es de plantas s&atilde;o altamente homog&ecirc;neas.</font></P>  <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">KEYWORDS / </font> </B><font face="Verdana" size="2"> Cell Suspension Cultures / Genetic Stability / Regeneration / Solanum tuberosum / Somatic Embryogenesis /</font> </P> <FONT SIZE=2>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Received: </b> 03/05/2007.&nbsp; <b>Accepted: </b> 01/28/2008.</font></P> </FONT> <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Introduction</font></P> </B>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Somatic embryogenesis of true-to-type potato plants represents an important process to improve quality, resistance to diseases and agronomic characters of the potato crop (Haberlach <I>et al</I>., 1985). Chromosome number variation and mitotic abnormalities should be evaluated through the whole <I>in vitro</I> process: callus formation, embryo differentiation and plant development. The observed differences would indicate genetic variations in the tissues, leading to the generation of plantlets that do not inherit the genetic traits of the mother plant. JayaSree <I>et al</I>. (2001) established an efficient procedure to induce somatic embryos from leaf culture of potato cv. Jyothi and their regeneration into complete plantlets. Seabrook and Douglass (2001) reported the induction of somatic embryos on <I>in vitro</I> cultured stem internodes, leaves, microtubers and roots of 18 tetraploid potato cultivars. They observed genotypic differences in the regenerative capacity of these cultivars. More recently, Sharma and Millam (2004) discriminated the progression of specific stages of potato somatic embryos by histological means. Vargas <I>et al</I>., (2005) established an embryogenic cell suspension culture from friable callus of <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> <I>L</I>. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e<I> </I>internode sections. They described an association between the accumulation of extracellular proteins of various molecular weights and different phases of the embryogenic process.</font></P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Karyotipe analysis can provide valuable genetic characterization information; however, there are only a few cytogenetic studies reported to date (in either cultivated or wild potato plants), because of the small and relatively numerous chromosomes. The presence of cellular polyploidization in potato cell culture during callus formation has been reported by some authors (Calberg <I>et al</I>., 1984; Ramulu <I>et al</I>., 1985; Osifo <I>et al</I>., 1989; Pijnacker <I>et al</I>., 1989; Dathe and Wersuhn, 1990; Fleming <I>et al</I>., 1992; Wersuhn and Dathe, 1998; Xena <I>et al</I>., 2000). A correlation between the chromosomal and nuclear parameters of 23 advanced breeding lines of <I>S. tuberosum</I> has also been described (Mohanty <I>et</I> <I>al</I>., 2004). Structural alterations in the chromosomes, as well as loss or addition of highly repetitive sequences in the genome, demonstrated DNA content variations at the cultivar level (Xena <I>et al</I>., 2000).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The absence of cytokinesis during mitosis of potato cells maintained on <I>in vitro</I> cell suspension cultures is the origin of the frequently observed polyploidization on these cells (Ramulu <I>et al</I>., 1985; Nuty Ronchi and Giorgetti, 1995).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">A set of molecular techniques have been developed to evaluate chromosome mutations such as inversion, deletion or translocation, as well as gene single base substitutions. One of them is the use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) technique. By means of single primers of arbitrary nucleotide sequence, it is possible to randomly amplify DNA sequences throughout all the genome. RAPD polymorphism which comes from either a nucleotide base change, that alters the primer binding site, or from an insertion or deflection within the amplified region (Williams <I>et al</I> 1990), is usually detected by the presence or absence of an amplification product from a single locus (Tingey <I>et al</I>., 1992). The products of these amplifications can be polymorphic and used as genetic markers (Hu and Quiros, 1991). Over the 1990's, the lack of reproducibility of results between different laboratories was a main concern in the utilization of RAPD markers to determine genetic uniformity of cultivars and somaclones. However, in the past years, important advances in technique implementation have been achieved along with the standardization of DNA extraction and DNA amplification protocols. Nayak <I>et al</I>. (2003) found changes in the RAPD banding pattern in one improved Jamrosa somaclone as compared to donor parent. Modgil <I>et al</I>. (2005) used RAPD to assess the genetic stability of 10 micropropagated plants regenerated through axillary buds of clonal apple (<I>Malus pumila</I> Mill.) rootstock MM106. Their results showed that RAPD markers could be used to detect genetic similarities and dissimilarities in micropropagated material. An efficient <I>in vitro</I> multiplication system in <I>Chlorophytum arundinaceum</I> has also been established and the genetic fidelity was assessed using RAPDs, karyotype analysis and meiotic behavior of <I>in vitro</I> and <I>in vivo</I> plants (Latoo <I>et al</I>., 2006).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In this report, the stability of a potato (<I>Solanum tuberosum</I> L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e) population regenerated from cell suspension cultures is analyzed. Cytogenetic analysis and RAPDs were used to evaluate the presence of genetic mutation on callus cells that gave rise to somatic embryos, and in root apex cells of regenerated plants. The results indicated that the population of regenerated potato plants was highly  homogeneous.</font></P> <B>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Materials and Methods</font></P> </B><I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Plant material</font></P> </I>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Stem internodal sections were obtained from <I>in vitro</I> propagated shoots of potato <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e plants.</font></P>  <I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Induction and establishment of cell suspension cultures</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">To induce callus tissue, nodal sections (1-1.5cm long) were cultured on MS1 medium (<a href="#tab1">Table I</a>) based on MS salts (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) and incubated in the dark at 25 ±1°C for 2 months, following the protocol established by De Garc&iacute;a and Mart&iacute;nez (1955). For the  establishment of embryogenic cell suspension cultures, the procedure described by Vargas <I>et al</I>. (2005) was followed. Briefly, 1g of callus tissue was inoculated into 100ml of liquid medium MS2 (<a href="#tab1">Table I</a>), placed over an orbital shaker (160rpm), and incubated in darkness at 25 ±1°C for two weeks. All media renewals were performed by decanting the suspension every 15 days. After two weeks, suspension cultures were filtered through sterile 100mm mesh, transferred to fresh MS2 medium and placed in the same environmental conditions. Two weeks later, cells were transferred to an MS3 medium (<a href="#tab1">Table I</a>), and maintained under continuous light conditions (50</font><font size="2" face="Symbol">m</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">mol·m<SUP>-2</SUP>·s<SUP>-1</SUP>), at 25 ±1°C. Cells remained in this medium until pro-embryogenic groups and globular embryos were observed (30 days). Following this phase, MS3 medium was substituted by MS4 medium, where somatic embryos remained for an additional 30 days. Once somatic embryos had reached maturity, they were transferred to a solid medium MS8 (<a href="#tab1">Table I</a>), where the embryos developed into plantlets. Forty plantlets 8cm long were potted in a mixture of soil and river sand 3:1, and placed under high humidity (80-93% relative humidity), and low light conditions (10mmol·m<SUP>-2</SUP>·s<SUP>-1</SUP>). Ten days later plantlets were transferred to a greenhouse.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="tab1"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11tab1.jpg" width="424" height="425"></a></P>  <I>    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Cytogenetic analysis</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Parental plants root apexes, callus tissue, embryos in different developmental stages (globular, heart and torpedo), and root apices from 20 regenerated <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e plants were evaluated. The plants were selected from three different independent cell suspension cultures.</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">All tissues were fixed for 24h on Carnoy (ethanol:acetic acid 3:1) and stored on 75% ethanol at 4ºC. Squashes were made with 1M HCL for 10min and stained with carbolfucsin. Observations and photographs were made on a Nikon Optiphot optical microscopy (Sharma and Sharma, 1972).</font></P>  <I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">DNA isolation</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">DNA was extracted from 19 randomly selected potato <I>in vitro</I> plantlets from three different independently started cell suspension cultures using the CTAB procedure (Doyle and Doyle, 1990).</font></P>  <I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">RAPD analysis</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Seventeen decamer primers obtained from OPERON<SUP>&reg;</SUP> were used in this study (<a href="#tab2">Table II</a>), following the protocol established by Demeke <I>et al</I>. (1996). PCR was performed in a volume of 25</font><font size="2" face="Symbol">m</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">l containing 2.5</font><font size="2" face="Symbol">m</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">l 10X Buffer, 2.0mM MgCl<SUB>2</SUB>, 0.1mM dNTPs, 0.2mM primers, 80ng template DNA, and 1.0 unit Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer). Amplification of DNA template was performed in a PTC-100 Programmable Thermal Cycler (MJ Research), following the cycle parameter established by Singsit and Akings (1993). The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation step of 1min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 1min at 94°C, 1min at 36°C and 2min at 72°C, and a final extension step of 10min at 72°C. For each primer, tubes containing all reaction components except for the DNA template were included as control to check for contamination. Reaction products were resolved by electrophoresis in 1.4% agarose/ethidium bromide gels. Duplicate reactions were routinely performed to ensure reproducibility.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="tab2"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11tab2.jpg" width="583" height="426"></a></P> <B>     
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Results</font></P> </B><I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Cytogenetics of donor plants</font></P> </I>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Uni-nuclear isodiametric cells were present in donor plants root apexes and in only a few cases binucleated cells were found. Cells (<a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a>) contained the typical euploid chromosome number (2n=4x=48). Interestingly, some isolated chromosomes were observed as well, which were not related to the &quot;achromatic spindle&quot; and produced abnormal anaphases with laggard chromosomes and chromosomal bridges. No polyploid cells appeared to be evident.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig1"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig1.jpg" width="234" height="284"></a></P>  <I>    
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Cytogenetics of callus tissue</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In calli tissue mixoploidy was evident due to the existence of abundant binucleated cells. The polyploidization of certain cells takes place during karyokinesis. Some binucleated cells went through synchronized bimitosis, where simultaneous cellular divisions occurred in the two nuclei. Furthermore, big cells with conspicuous nuclei were present, showing amorphous bodies. Cells with polyploid metaphase (more than 90 chromosomes) and some with metaphase plate were also observed (<a href="#fig2">Figure 2)</a>.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig2"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig2.jpg" width="281" height="250"></a></P>  <I>    
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Somatic embryos</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In somatic embryos (<a href="#fig3">Figure 3</a>), most of the cells were euploids (2n=48) with chromosomes comparable in size and shape to the standard chromosomes observed in the roots apexes of the donor plants. Few cells were observed in division phase; most of them with one nucleus, and very few cells were binucleated and went through bimitosis. Cells in anaphase with chromosome bridges were also found (<a href="#fig4">Figure 4</a>). Nonetheless, some isolated chromosomes, which are not related to the chromatic spindle, produced abnormal anaphase with laggard chromosomes and chromosomic bridges. Aneuploid cells with lower number of chromosomes than normal ones were also present.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig3"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig3.jpg" width="260" height="257"></a></P>     
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig4"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig4.jpg" width="304" height="255"></a></P>  <I>    
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Regenerated plants</font></P> </I>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In the root apex of regenerated plants, cells with different morphology (isodiametric, rounded or elongated) were observed. All the cells had a single nucleus and the number of chromosomes was the standard euploid (2n=48). Two different types of chromosomes were present in the metaphase plate: shorter and thicker chromosomes and normal ones. Some anaphases were typical, well organized and others were amply disordered, with chromosome bridges (<a href="#fig5">Figure 5a</a>, <a href="#fig5">b</a>). Polyploidy was not a feature. In general, the abnormalities found in the regenerated plants were less than those exhibited in the cells of the calli which gave rise to these plants.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig5"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig5.jpg" width="466" height="239"></a></P>  <I>    
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">RAPD analysis</font></P> </I>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In order to determine if the plants regenerated from embryogenic cell suspension cultures of potato showed any induced genetic variation when compared to the donor plant, screening by RAPD markers was performed. Amplification of genomic DNA from the 19 randomly selected regenerated plants with 17 decamer primers yielded a total of 2470 highly reproducible RAPD fragments ranging in size from 400 to 2600bp (<a href="#tab3">Table III</a>). The number of fragments produced (<a href="#tab2">Table II</a>) ranged from 4 (OPA-18 primer) to 10 (OPA-01, OPA-03, OPA-04 and OPA-09 primers). The 17 primers tested produced representative amplified band patterns that were monomorphic in 19 regenerated plantlets and the parental ones. <a href="#fig6"> Figure 6</a> shows a monomorphic amplification pattern using primer OPA-17. With primers OPA-02 and OPA-13, polymorphic band patterns were obtained from regenerated plants 3 and 16, respectively. <a href="#fig7"> Figure 7 </a> shows polymorphic band patterns with primer OPA-13.</font></P>      <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="tab3"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11tab3.jpg" width="381" height="288"></a></P>      
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig6"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig6.jpg" width="580" height="254"></a></P>      
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="center"><a name="fig7"><img border="0" src="/img/fbpe/inci/v33n3/art11fig7.jpg" width="580" height="291"></a></P>      
<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="left"><B><font face="Verdana" size="2">Discussion</font></P> </B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Genetic variability is a common feature of plant cells that have undergone a tissue culture protocol. This genetic variability could be pre-existing in the cells of the donor plant or could be originated in the culture process, mainly in the callus phase (Singsit and Akings, 1993). They both could influence the genetic stability of regenerated plants.</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Polyploid metaphase was a characteristic of calli tissue in the present study. According to Ramulu <I>et al</I>. (1985) endoreduplication and endomitosis constitute the major mechanisms of polyploidization in potato cells. Cytokinesis failure during karyokinesis can also give rise to polyploid cells (Nuty Ronchi and Giorgetti, 1995). In this case binucleated cells are formed, followed by the simultaneous cellular divisions in the two nuclei (bimitosis). In some instances, partial disorganization of the achromatic spindles arises when multipolar metaphases with dispersed chromosomes are produced, followed by mitosis without cytokinesis, giving rise to polyploid cells (Sivarolla, 1992).</font></P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">In this work, embryogenic cell suspension cultures were established from this mixoploid cell tissue. Most of the somatic embryos that arose from these cell suspension cultures were euploid (2n=48) with chromosomes comparable in size and shape to the standard chromosomes observed in the root tips of donor plants. Few cells were binucleated.</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Potato plants were regenerated from 18 week-old embryogenic cell suspension cultures. They did not show any morphological changes at mature stages. Cytogenetic analysis of the root tips from these plants demonstrated that all the cells have a single nucleus and euploid chromosome number. These results demonstrate that although genotypic variations are present in embryogenic tissue and cell suspension cultures, plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis from such cultures are euploid (2n=4x=48). The findings presented are in accordance with the observation that euploid cells are positively selected to undergo somatic embryogenesis and regeneration as reported in other cases (Karp and Bright, 1985; Shauker and Mohan Ram, 1993; Mythili <I>et al</I>., 1995).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The results are also in agreement with reports by Vasil and Vasil (1981) and Swedlund and Vasil (1985). These authors obtained plants of <I>Pennisetum americanum </I>regenerated from cell suspension cultures, which were phenotypically and cytologically similar to the donor plants. Genetic stability of plants regenerated from cell suspension cultures of medow fescue (<I>Festuca pratensis</I>) and protoplasts isolated therefrom, have also been reported (Vall&eacute;s <I>et al</I>., 1993).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">On the other hand, Xena <I>et al</I>. (2000) did a cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic callus of <I>S. tuberosum</I>. cv D&egrave;sir&eacute;e growing in solid media. They found several mixoploid cells in different tissues of their plant population, which exhibited an anomalous development. The present results suggest that only euploid cells produce regenerated plantlets through somatic embryogenesis.</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The usefulness of RAPDs as a means of molecular analysis of in vitro regenerated plants has been well documented (Nayak <I>et al</I>., 2003; Modgil <I>et al</I>., 2005; Latoo <I>et al</I>., 2006). In this work, the genetic stability of the regenerated plants was also screened by RAPD markers that could detect chromosomic mutations related to DNA sequence modifications. Seventeen primers were tested to analyze 19 regenerated plants as well as the parental. Genomic DNA amplification produced 2470 bands, all of them highly reproducible, with a molecular weight between 400 to 2600bp. Most of the primers tested revealed a monomorphic band pattern, except for primers OPA-2 and OPA-13, which produced 6 polymorphic bands representing only 0.24% of the total (2470). This molecular approach demonstrates the lack of genetic variation of the plantlets, in concordance with the cytogenetic analysis. The small variations detected by RAPD markers could be explained by minor genetic rearrangements that take place during tissue culture of calli or cell suspension steps and do not influence the phenotype of the regenerated plants (Qin <I>et al</I>., 2007).</font></P>     <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">The results obtained, employing cytogenetic analysis and RAPD markers, demonstrate that plants of <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e regenerated from embryogenic cell suspension cultures do not exhibit the genotypic variations that are characteristic of the cell suspension cultures which gave rise to these plants. The results also indicate that this potato population is highly homogeneous and genetically stable. It is concluded that the potato high frequency embryogenic system is a suitable method for large scale potato plant regeneration.</font></P>  <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</font></P> </B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">This research was supported by the Scientific and Humanistic Council of the <I>Universidad Central de Venezuela</I>, Caracas, Venezuela.</font></P>  <B>    <P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">REFERENCES</font></P> </B>    <!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">1. Calberg I, Glimelius K, Eriksson T (1984) Nuclear DNA-content during the initiation of callus formation from isolated protoplasts of <I>Solanum tuberosum </I>L. <I>Plant Sci. Lett. 35</I>: 225-230.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066473&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">2. Dathe U, Wersuhn G (1990) Temporary chromosome number stabilization in potato cell cultures. <I>Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult 22</I>: 43-47.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066474&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">3. De Garc&iacute;a E, Mart&iacute;nez S (1955) Somatic embryogenesis in <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> L. cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e from stem nodal section. <I>J. Plant Physiol. 145</I>: 526-530.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066475&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">4. Demeke T, Lynch DR, Kawchuk LM, Kozub GC, Armstrong JD (1996) Genetic diversity of potato determined by ramdom amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 15</I>: 662-667.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066476&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">5. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. <I>Phytochem. Bull. 19</I>: 11-15.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066477&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">6. Fleming ML, De Maine MJ, Powell W (1992) Ploidy doubling by callus culture of potato dihaploid leaf explants and the variation in regenerated plants. <I>Ann. Appl. Biol. 21</I>: 183-188.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066478&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">7. Haberlach GT, Cohen BA, Reichert NA, Baer MA, Towill LE, Helgeson JP (1985) Isolation, culture and regeneration of protoplast from potato and several related <I>Solanum </I>species. <I>Plant Sci. 39</I>: 67-74.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066479&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">8. Hu J, Quir&oacute;s CF (1991) Identification of broccoli and cauliflower cultivars with RAPD markers. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 10</I>: 505-511.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066480&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">9. JayaSree T, Pavan U, Ramesh M, Rao AV, Jagan MR, Sadanandam A (2001) Somatic embryogenesis from leaf potato cultures of potato. <I>Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 64</I>: 13-17.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066481&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">10. Karp A, Bright SWJ (1985) On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation. <I>Oxford Surv Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 2</I>: 199-234.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066482&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">11. Latoo SK, Bamotra S, Sapru Dhar R, Khan S (2006) Rapid plant regeneration and analysis of genetic fidelity of <I>in vitro</I> derived plants of <I>Chlorophytum arundinaceum</I> Baker-an endangered medicinal herb. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 25</I>: 499-506.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066483&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">12. Modgil M, Mahajan K, Chakrabarti SK, Sharma DR, Sobti RC (2005) Molecular analysis of genetic stability in micropropagated apple rootstock MM106. <I>Sci. Hort. 104</I>: 151-160.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066484&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">13. Mohanty IC, Mahapatra D, Mohanty S, Das AB (2004) Karyotype analysis and studies on the nuclear DNA content in 30 genotypes of potato (<I>Solanum tuberosum</I>) L. <I>Cell Biol. Int. 28</I>: 625-633.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066485&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">14. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. <I>Physiol. Plant. 15</I>: 473-497.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066486&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">15. Mythili PK, Subba Rao MV, Manga V (1995) Cytology of explants, calli and regenerants in five imbred lines of Pearl Millet, <I>Pennisetum glaucum</I> (L.), R. Br. <I>Cytologia 60</I>: 23-29.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066487&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">16. Nayak S, Debata BK, Srivastava VK, Sangwan NS (2003) Evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variants in Jamrosa (a hybrid C<I>ymbopogon</I>) and detection of genetic changes through RAPD. <I>Plant Sci. 164</I>: 1029-1035.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066488&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">17. Nuty Ronchi V, Giorgetti L (1995) The cells commitment to somatic embryogenesis. In Bajaj YPS (Ed.) <I>Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry</I>, Vol 30. <I>Somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed I</I>. Springer. New York, USA. pp 3-19.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066489&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">18. Osifo EC, Webb JK, Henshaw GG (1989) Variation amongst callus-derived potato plants, <I>Solanum brevidens</I>. <I>J. Plant Physiol. 134</I>: 1-4.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066490&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">19. Pijnacker LP, Sree Ramulu K, Dojkhuis P, Ferwerda MA (1989) Flow cytometric and kariological analysis of polysomaty and polyploidization during callus formation from leaf segments of various potato genotypes. <I>Theor. Appl. Gen. 77</I>: 102-110.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066491&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">20. Qin Y, Hong-Ling L, Yang-Dong G (2007) High-frequency embryogenesis, regeneration of broccoli (<I>Brassica oleracea</I> var <I>italica) </I>and analysis of genetic stability by RAPD. <I>Sci. Hort. 111</I>: 203-208.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066492&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">21. Ramulu SK, Dijkhuis P, Roest S, Bokelman GSB, De Groot B (1985) Patterns of DNA and chromosome variation during <I>in vitro</I> growth in various genotypes of potato. <I>Plant Sci. 41</I>: 69-78.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066493&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">22. Seabrook JEA, Douglass LK (2001) Somatic embryogenesis on various potato tissues from a range of genotypes and ploidy levels. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 20</I>: 175-182.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066494&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">23. Sharma AK, Sharma A (1972) <I>Chromosome Techniques. Theory and Practice</I>. Buttworths University-Park Press. London, UK. 176 pp.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066495&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">24. Sharma SK, Millam S (2004) Somatic embryogenesis in <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> L.: a histological examination of key developmental stages. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 23</I>: 115-119.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066496&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">25. Shauker S, Mohan Ram HY (1993) Aberrant chromosome numbers in the callus and regenerated shoot buds in <I>Sesbania grandiflora</I> L. <I>Phytomorphology 43</I>: 75-80.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066497&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">26. Singsit C, Akings P (1993) Genetic variation in monoploids of diploids potatoes and detection of clone-specific random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. <I>Plant Cell Rep. 12</I>:144-148.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066498&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">27. Sivarolla MB (1992) Plant genomic alterations due to tissue culture. <I>Ci&euml;ncia e Cultura 44</I>: 329-335.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066499&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">28. Swedlund BD, Vasil IK (1985) Cytogenetic characterization of embryogenic callus and regenerated plants of <I>Pennisetum americanum</I> (L.) K. Schum. <I>Theor. Appl. Genet. 69</I>: 575-581.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066500&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">29. Tingey SV, Rafalski JA, Williams JGK (1992) Genetic analysis with RAPD markers. In <I>Applications of RAPD Technology to Plant Breeding</I>. Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 3-8.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066501&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">30. Vall&eacute;s MP, Wang ZY, Montavon, Potrykus I, Spangenberg G (1993) Analysis of genetic stability of plants regenerated from suspension cultures and protoplasts of meadow fescue (<I>Festuca pratensis</I> Huds). <I>Plant Cell Rep. 12</I>: 101-106.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066502&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">31. Vargas ET, De Garc&iacute;a E, Oropeza M (2005) Somatic embryogenesis in <I>Solanum tuberosum</I> from cell suspension cultures: histological analysis and extracellular protein patterns. <I>J. Plant Physiol. 162</I>: 449-454.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066503&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">32. Vasil V, Vasil IK (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from tissue cultures of <I>Pennisetum americanum</I> and <I>P. americanum</I> x <I>P. purpureum</I> hybrid. <I>Am. J. Bot. 68</I>: 864-872.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066504&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">33. Wersuhn G, Dathe U (1998) Genome selection within cell cultures of potato and tobacco. <I>Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 54</I>: 15-20.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066505&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">34. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primer are useful as genetic markers. <I>Nuc. Acids Res. 18</I>: 6531-6535.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066506&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P style="word-spacing: 0; line-height: 100%" align="justify"><font face="Verdana" size="2">35. Xena N, Vargas TE, Hu&eacute;rfano A, De Garc&iacute;a E (2000) Caracterizaci&oacute;n citogen&eacute;tica del proceso de embriog&eacute;nesis som&aacute;tica indirecta en medio s&oacute;lido en <I>Solanum tuberosum </I>cv. D&eacute;sir&eacute;e. <I>Acta Bot. Venez. 23</I>: 97-104.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1066507&pid=S0378-1844200800030001100035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Glimelius]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eriksson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nuclear DNA-content during the initiation of callus formation from isolated protoplasts of Solanum tuberosum L]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Sci. Lett.]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>225-230</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dathe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wersuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Temporary chromosome number stabilization in potato cell cultures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>43-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis in Solanum tuberosum L]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[cv. Désirée from stem nodal section. J. Plant Physiol.]]></source>
<year>1955</year>
<volume>145</volume>
<page-range>526-530</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Demeke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lynch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kawchuk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kozub]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Armstrong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic diversity of potato determined by ramdom amplified polymorphic DNA analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>662-667</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doyle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doyle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytochem. Bull.]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>11-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fleming]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Maine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Powell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ploidy doubling by callus culture of potato dihaploid leaf explants and the variation in regenerated plants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Appl. Biol.]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>183-188</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haberlach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reichert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Towill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Helgeson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Isolation, culture and regeneration of protoplast from potato and several related Solanum species]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Sci.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>67-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quirós]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Identification of broccoli and cauliflower cultivars with RAPD markers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>505-511</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JayaSree]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pavan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramesh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jagan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sadanandam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis from leaf potato cultures of potato]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>13-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SWJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Surv Plant Mol. Cell Biol.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>199-234</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bamotra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sapru Dhar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rapid plant regeneration and analysis of genetic fidelity of in vitro derived plants of Chlorophytum arundinaceum Baker-an endangered medicinal herb]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>499-506</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Modgil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahajan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chakrabarti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sobti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Molecular analysis of genetic stability in micropropagated apple rootstock MM106]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci. Hort.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<page-range>151-160</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohanty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahapatra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohanty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Karyotype analysis and studies on the nuclear DNA content in 30 genotypes of potato (Solanum tuberosum) L]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cell Biol. Int.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>625-633</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murashige]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skoog]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Physiol. Plant.]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>473-497</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mythili]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Subba Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Cytology of explants, calli and regenerants in five imbred lines of Pearl Millet, Pennisetum glaucum (L.),]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[R. Br. Cytologia]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<page-range>23-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nayak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Debata]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srivastava]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sangwan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of agronomically useful somaclonal variants in Jamrosa (a hybrid Cymbopogon) and detection of genetic changes through RAPD]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Sci.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>164</volume>
<page-range>1029-1035</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nuty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ronchi V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giorgetti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The cells commitment to somatic embryogenesis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bajaj]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YPS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol 30]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<page-range>pp 3-19</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Springer.^eNew York New York]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed I]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osifo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Webb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henshaw]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Variation amongst callus-derived potato plants, Solanum brevidens]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Plant Physiol.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>134</volume>
<page-range>1-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pijnacker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sree Ramulu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dojkhuis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferwerda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Flow cytometric and kariological analysis of polysomaty and polyploidization during callus formation from leaf segments of various potato genotypes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Theor. Appl. Gen.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>102-110</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Qin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hong-Ling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang-Dong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[High-frequency embryogenesis, regeneration of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var italica) and analysis of genetic stability by RAPD]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci. Hort.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<page-range>203-208</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramulu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dijkhuis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roest]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bokelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GSB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Groot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Patterns of DNA and chromosome variation during in vitro growth in various genotypes of potato]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Sci.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>69-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seabrook]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JEA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Douglass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis on various potato tissues from a range of genotypes and ploidy levels]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<page-range>175-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Chromosome Techniques]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<page-range>176</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Theory and PracticeButtworths University-Park Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Millam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis in Solanum tuberosum L.: a histological examination of key developmental stages]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>115-119</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shauker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohan Ram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HY]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aberrant chromosome numbers in the callus and regenerated shoot buds in Sesbania grandiflora L]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytomorphology]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>75-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singsit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic variation in monoploids of diploids potatoes and detection of clone-specific random amplified polymorphic DNA markers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>144-148</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sivarolla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Plant genomic alterations due to tissue culture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ciëncia e Cultura]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>329-335</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swedlund]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Cytogenetic characterization of embryogenic callus and regenerated plants of Pennisetum americanum (L.) K]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Schum. Theor. Appl. Genet.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>575-581</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tingey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rafalski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JGK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Genetic analysis with RAPD markers]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>3-8</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Minneapolis^eMN MN]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[In Applications of RAPD Technology to Plant Breeding]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vallés]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ZY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montavon, Potrykus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spangenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analysis of genetic stability of plants regenerated from suspension cultures and protoplasts of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>101-106</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ET]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oropeza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis in Solanum tuberosum from cell suspension cultures: histological analysis and extracellular protein patterns]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Plant Physiol.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>162</volume>
<page-range>449-454</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from tissue cultures of Pennisetum americanum and P. americanum x P.  purpureum hybrid]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am. J. Bot.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<page-range>864-872</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wersuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dathe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genome selection within cell cultures of potato and tobacco]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>15-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JGK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kubelik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Livak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rafalski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tingey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primer are useful as genetic markers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nuc. Acids Res.]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>6531-6535</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huérfano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Caracterización citogenética del proceso de embriogénesis somática indirecta en medio sólido en Solanum tuberosum cv]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Désirée. Acta Bot. Venez.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>97-104</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
