<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1856-9560</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Gaceta Técnica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Gac. Téc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1856-9560</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1856-95602025000200037</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51372/gacetatecnica262.4</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[REVISIÓN Y APLICACIÓN DE LA NORMA ANSI/AISC 341-22 PARA EL DISEÑO SÍSMICO DE UNA ESTRUCTURA INDUSTRIAL EN EL MARCO NORMATIVO CHILENO]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[REVIEW AND APPLICATION OF THE ANSI/AISC 341-22 STANDARD FOR THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF AN INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE IN THE CHILEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quinteros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vielma Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,felipe.quinteros.s@mail.pucv.cl  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>37</fpage>
<lpage>46</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1856-95602025000200037&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1856-95602025000200037&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1856-95602025000200037&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN El estudio revisa la norma ANSI/AISC 341-22 para el diseño sísmico de estructuras industriales en Chile, comparándola con la normativa chilena NCh2369. Dado que Chile es una zona de alta sismicidad, se requieren normativas estrictas para garantizar la seguridad estructural. Mientras que la NCh2369 enfatiza la rigidez y la disipación de energía mediante anclajes, la AISC 341-22 prioriza la ductilidad mediante la formación de rótulas plásticas en vigas. El diseño antisísmico de estructuras industriales está regulado por la NCh2369, que recomienda la AISC como normativa complementaria. Sin embargo, ambas tienen enfoques distintos en la disipación de energía. La AISC clasifica los elementos estructurales en moderada o altamente dúctiles para maximizar su capacidad inelástica. Para evaluar la aplicación de la AISC 341-22, se diseñó una estructura tipo rack utilizando esta norma, aplicando la NCh2369 para cargas y análisis sísmicos. El modelado se realizó con Robot Structural Analysis 2024, optimizando perfiles estructurales y verificando su cumplimiento normativo. Uno de los principales hallazgos fue la detección de varios perfiles W que no cumplían con las exigencias de la AISC 341-22. También se destacó la importancia de la verificación temprana de la esbeltez para evitar reprocesos y ajustes en la selección de perfiles. Además de un no cumplimiento con las deformaciones límites impuestas por la NCh2369 producto de la diferencia de demandas sísmicas entre normas.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT The study reviews the ANSI/AISC 341-22 standard for the seismic design of industrial structures in Chile, comparing it with the Chilean standard NCh2369. Since Chile is a high seismicity zone, strict regulations are required to ensure structural safety. While NCh2369 emphasizes stiffness and energy dissipation through anchoring, AISC 341-22 prioritizes ductility through the formation of plastic hinges in beams. The seismic design of industrial structures is regulated by NCh2369, which recommends AISC as a complementary standard. However, both standards have different approaches to energy dissipation. AISC classifies structural elements as moderately or highly ductile to maximize their inelastic capacity. To evaluate the application of AISC 341-22, a rack-type structure was designed using this standard, applying NCh2369 for loads and seismic analysis. The modeling was done using Robot Structural Analysis 2024, optimizing structural profiles and verifying their compliance with regulations. One of the main findings was the detection of several W profiles that did not meet the requirements of AISC 341-22. The importance of early verification of slenderness was also highlighted to avoid reprocessing and adjustments in profile selection. Additionally, there was non-compliance with the displacement limits imposed by NCh2369 due to the difference in seismic demands between standards.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ANSI/AISC 341-22]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[NCh2369]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Robot Structural Analysis 2024]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estructuras industriales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[marcos de momento]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ANSI/AISC 341-22]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[NCh2369]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Robot Structural Analysis 2024]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[industrial structures]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[moment frames]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>[1]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>INN (Instituto Nacional de Normalización), Chile</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño sísmico de estructuras e instalaciones industriales]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago, Chile ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Consejo del Instituto Nacional de Normalización]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>[2]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>AISC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Specification for Structural Steel Buildings]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<page-range>341-22</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[American Institute of Steel Construction]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>[3]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saragoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El mega terremoto del Maule de 2010: una lección de buena ingeniería, pero con sorpresas y nuevos desafíos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anales de la Universidad de Chile]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>35-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>[4]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medalla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bravo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hidalgo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Disposiciones Nch2369 Vs Asce7 -Aplicación a Marcos de Momento]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ XICongreso Chileno de Sismología e Ingeniería Sísmica ACHISINA]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Chile </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>[5]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The 2010 AISC seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ 9thUS National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th International Tsunami Sysposium]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Toronto, Ontario, Canada </conf-loc>
<page-range>3406-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>[6]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shakeri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akrami]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shokrgozar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparing responses of special and intermediate moment frames under repeated earthquakes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>175</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>847-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>[7]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Han]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Seismic performance evaluation of steel ordinary moment frames]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Earthquake Spectra]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>55-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>[8]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mulas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A structural model for panel zones in non linear seismic analysis of steel moment-resisting frames]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<page-range>1-18</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano, IT ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>[9]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elghazouli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Izzuddin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Modelling of the panel zone in steel and composite moment frames]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>1-16</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[UK ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>[10]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>INN (Instituto Nacional de Normalización), Chile</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño estructural - Cargas permanentes y cargas de uso]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago, Chile ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>[11]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>INN (Instituto Nacional de Normalización), Chile</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño estructural - Disposiciones generales y combinaciones de cargas]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>[12]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>American Society of Civil Engineers</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<page-range>7-22</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Reston, VA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ASCE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>[13]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Autodesk</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Autodesk Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>[14]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>AISC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[American Institute of Steel Construction]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
