SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número1Quiste dentígero asociado a una transmigración mandibular y presencia de un diente supernumerario. Presentación de un caso clínicoImpacto del uso de tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TICs) en la formación de competencias clínicas en estudiantes de enfermería: una revisión sistemática. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Más Vita. Revista de Ciencias de la Salud

versión On-line ISSN 2665-0150

Resumen

PALENCIA, Esperanza et al. The Gap Between the Norm and Patient Care: Challenges to the Bioethical Principle of Justice in Ecuador. MasVita [online]. 2026, vol.8, n.1, pp.87-97.  Epub 10-Abr-2026. ISSN 2665-0150.  https://doi.org/10.47606/acven/mv0314.

Introduction:

The allocation of critical healthcare resources represents one of the most complex dilemmas in contemporary bioethics, particularly in contexts marked by structural limitations such as Ecuador. The bioethical principle of justice plays a central role in guiding clinical decisions related to the equitable distribution of scarce resources, including intensive care unit (ICU) beds, from ethical, legal, and deontological perspectives.

Objective:

To analyze the application of the bioethical principle of justice in the allocation of critical healthcare resources through the examination of a clinical case, integrating a hermeneutic, ethical, and legal approach within the Ecuadorian context.

Materials and Methods:

An argumentative hermeneutic essay was developed using a qualitative and reflective approach, structured according to the hermeneutic cycle in three phases: (1) pre-understanding, focused on the ethical dilemma “Ethical decision-making in ICU allocation for critically ill patients”; (2) micro-hermeneutic analysis of the case components; and (3) macro-hermeneutic argumentation aimed at achieving a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon and its ethical and legal foundations.

Results:

The analysis demonstrated that the application of the principle of justice requires distribution criteria grounded in equity, proportionality, and non-discrimination, moving beyond purely utilitarian or administrative approaches. It also highlighted the need to integrate deontological principles and national regulatory frameworks to strengthen clinical decision-making in situations of resource scarcity.

Conclusions:

The bioethical principle of justice constitutes a fundamental ethical pillar that compels healthcare systems to ensure equitable resource distribution, guaranteeing access to care with respect, equality, and human dignity, regardless of age, gender, or clinical condition. Its proper application requires solid ethical training and clear normative criteria to guide responsible decision-making in critical contexts.

Palabras clave : Bioethics; Health; Care; Hermeneutics; Social Justice.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )