SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número3Estudio por manometría esofágica de pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico, en CubaRespuesta a la terapia combinada vs monoterapia con betabloqueantes en profilaxis primaria de sangrado variceal en pacientes con cirrosis hepática índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Gen

versión impresa ISSN 0016-3503versión On-line ISSN 2477-975X

Resumen

CASTILLO, R et al. Helicobacter pylori: Efectividad del tratamiento secuencial vs tratamiento convencional. Gen [online]. 2011, vol.65, n.3, pp.183-186. ISSN 0016-3503.

Helicobacter pylori (Helicobacter p. ) Its a bacteria that lives in the gastric mucosa and its prevalence is variable and it is associated to the development of peptic ulcer, lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Approximately 40% of individuals in developed countries are affected and 85% in undeveloped countries in which are related to low socioeconomics level. Recently its been proposed the use of a sequential therapy to eradicate the infection by Helicobacter p. The objective of this study consist in to compare the effectiveness between both treatments (Sequential and conventional) in the consult from the Gastroenterology Service of the Carlos J. Bello Hospital in a period of time between February 2008 to October 2009 in a total of 83 patients, 77,1% feminine, 22,9% masculine. The group that received conventional treatment represented 57,83% and sequential 42,17%. In regard to the effectiveness the conventional group presented 46, 99% and sequential group 32, 53%. The X2 test it didn’t present significative difference of effectiveness between both treatments.

Palabras clave : Helicobacter pylori; Conventional; Treatments; Sequential Treatments.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons