SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.85 número3Síntomas de disfunción del piso pélvico en mujeres practicantes de CrossFit®Parche endocervical autólogo a base de plasma rico en plaquetas como soporte alternativo en pacientes con rotura prematura de membranas. Serie de casos. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela

versión impresa ISSN 0048-7732

Resumen

NASTASI BASILE, María Inés; CALDERARO DI RUGGIERO, Franco  y  GONZALEZ BLANCO, Mireya. Stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer: primary debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez [online]. 2025, vol.85, n.3, pp.338-351.  Epub 23-Oct-2025. ISSN 0048-7732.  https://doi.org/10.51288/00850306.

Objective:

To compare survival of patients with stage III-IV ovarian epithelial cancer treated with primary debulking surgery with those treated with interval debulking surgery.

Methods:

Observational, retrospective, cohort study, which included 83 patients with ovarian epithelial cancer diagnosed and treated between 2012 - 2022, in the gynecology oncology consultation of the National Specialized Hospital of the Hospital Oncology Service of the Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, in two cohorts: 54 patients treated with primary debulking surgery and 29 patients with interval debulking surgery. A review of medical records was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and application of survival models (Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression).

Results:

73.5 % of the patients were in the 40 - 59 years old group. The most common histotype was high-grade papillary serous with 77.1%. Optimal debulking occurred in 79.6% of cases with primary debulking surgery and in 86.2% with interval debulking surgery. Progression-free survival in primary debulking surgery had a mean of 100.7 months with a probability of 88.6% at 5 years, and interval debulking surgery had a mean of 69.8 months with a probability of 52.9% (p = 0.139). The mean 5-year overall survival with primary debulking surgery was 85.6% and with interval debulking surgery was 70.1% (p = 0.095).

Conclusion:

Both treatments are comparable and effective, but more studies are needed to reach statistical significance between the groups.

Palabras clave : Epithelial ovarian cancer; primary debulking surgery; interval debulking surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Adjuvant chemotherapy.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )