SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.75 número2SALMONELOSIS ESPLÉNICA. CASO CLÍNICOCORRELACIÓN CLÍNICA, SISTEMAS TIRADS Y BETHESDA CON DIAGNÓSTICO HISTOPATOLÓGICO DE NÓDULOS TIROIDEOS. SERIE DE CASOS índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista Venezolana de Cirugía

versión impresa ISSN 0378-6420versión On-line ISSN 2665-0401

Resumen

LEVEL, Luis; JOSEPH, Sony; PINANGO, Silvia  y  INCHAUSTI, Cristina. COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION AS TREATMENT OF CHOLEDOCAL LITHIASIS: LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL APPROACH. PROSPECTIVE AND COMPARATIVE STUDY. RevVenezCir [online]. 2022, vol.75, n.2, pp.79-83.  Epub 16-Ago-2024. ISSN 0378-6420.  https://doi.org/10.48104/rvc.2022.75.2.7.

Common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis are an unusual complication associated to gallbladder stones. It can be resolved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or, alternatively, a CBD exploration by conventional (open surgery) or laparoscopic approach.

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic approach versus conventional approach in CBD exploration as a treatment for choledochal lithiasis.

Methods:

A prospective and comparative study was carried out with a non-random intentionally selected sample consisting of 31 patients with CBD stones.

Results:

Both groups had no statistical differences regarding age, sex, frequency of gallbladder stones, and preoperatory ERCP. The average surgical time was 4.52 versus 3.49 hours for the laparoscopic and conventional approaches, respectively. In laparoscopic group, Kehr tube was used in 21% of patients and primary closure in 79%. In conventional group, Kehr tube was used in 29% of patients versus 71% of patients with primary closure. Biliary leak was the most frequent complication. Hospital stay was 3.14 days in the laparoscopic group versus 5.23 days in the conventional group, with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion:

It was not possible to demonstrate an evident superiority of any of the groups studied, however our patients could benefit from the advantages of the laparoscopic approach in terms of less postoperative pain and faster return to their usual activities. Similar and larger studies are necessary to achieve stronger and conclusive data.

Palabras clave : Gallstones; biliary tract exploration; laparoscopic approach; conventional approach.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )