Abstract

HENRIQUEZ-PEREZ, Gladys  and  RACHED-PAOLI, Ingrid. Mid-Arm Circumference Effectiveness for the Nutritional Screening of Children in Primary Care. An Venez Nutr [online]. 2011, vol.24, n.1, pp.005-012. ISSN 0798-0752.

In order to assess the impact of using different reference values and cut-off points on the effectiveness of mid-arm circumference measurements in malnutrition screening for deficit and excess, 148 children under 5 years, without prematurity backgrounds or chronic pathologies, were studied. The nutritional status was evaluated using 2 methods: 1.- Arm circumference measurement, applying different reference values and cut-off points; 2.-An integral clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Descriptive statistics, concordances, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the Youden index were applied. The WHO 2006 p90 (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 92.1%; positive likelihood ratio: 12.67 and negative likelihood ratio: 0.00; Youden index: 0.92) resulted best for identifying excess risk in boys. In girls, only the WHO 2006 p85 resulted effective with the following values: 100%; 84.3%; 6.38; 0.00; and 0.84 for the previous statistics. As for deficit, the studied cut-off points resulted unacceptable. We recommend using percentiles 90 and 85 of the WHO 2006 reference for arm circumference effectiveness in identifying excess risk in boys and girls, respectively, but we do not recommend using the traditional percentiles to identify the risk of deficit in the same age group. The latter requires percentiles 16 to 20 to analyze its effectiveness, and the study must be validated at a population level.

Keywords : mid-arm circumference; screening; child; primary health care; validation studies; nutrition disorders in children.