SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1Modificación química de almidón de yuca nativo mediante la reacción de carboximetilación en medio acuosoDiseño y construcción de un sistema automatizado para la elaboración de películas delgadas, por el método de inmersión índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad Central de Venezuela

versión impresa ISSN 0798-4065

Resumen

PITTOL VERA, José A; LLATAS, Isabel  y  DER JANI-BAYEH, Sylvana. TATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PORE DISTRIBUTION MODELS OBTAINED FROM REJECTION PROFILE OF ULTRAFITRATION MEMBRANES. Rev. Fac. Ing. UCV [online]. 2011, vol.26, n.1, pp.129-141. ISSN 0798-4065.

The effective pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes’ is obtained from the experimental rejection profile of different types of membranes and solutes. For this, the hydrodynamic transport model is assumed and different standards probability density functions are compared to describe the effective pore size distribution. The chosen probabilistic models are the gamma, log-normal and Weibull, because they are skewed to the right. The robust Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for non-linear regression as implemented in Matlab® lsqcurvefit subroutine is used to provide the optimized parameters. The 95% confidence intervals for the optimized parameters are obtained from nlparci subroutine in Matlab®. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to test the effects of the probability distribution model in the prediction of the central moments, the average sieving coefficient and the average water flux. With statistical significant differences between 5 and 10%, the two-way and one-way (ANOVA) analysis, indicated that the chosen probabilistic model introduced a significant difference in the predictions of the effective average pore size, and the average sieving coefficient

Palabras clave : Ultrafiltration; Rejection profile; Effective pores size distribution; Average effective pore size; Average sieving coefficients.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español