SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número2Revisión sistemática de la competencia comunicativa en educación: estrategias, factores limitantes y el rol de la tecnologíaAnálisis de los procesos de adquisición de medicamentos en la administración pública de salud: una revisión sistemática índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista InveCom

versión On-line ISSN 2739-0063

Resumen

CONDESO CAMIZAN, Selman Dennis; CASTILLO PALACIOS, Freddy William  y  VILLANUEVA BUTRON, Groover Valenty. Impact of bibliographic managers on the research training of university students: A systematic review. Revista InveCom [online]. 2026, vol.6, n.2, e602076.  Epub 30-Sep-2025. ISSN 2739-0063.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16899559.

The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the impact of bibliographic managers on the research training of university students, highlighting their relevance in improving the quality and integrity of academic work. Twenty-five studies published between 2015 and 2025, in Spanish and English, were reviewed, selected from high-impact databases such as Scopus, SciELO, Dialnet, Redalyc, PubMed, and institutional repositories. To ensure a rigorous and transparent selection process, the PRISMA methodology was applied. The inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies related to the use of bibliographic managers in university-level education and research. The results show that managers such as Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, and RefWorks are essential tools for organizing, storing, and citing academic sources. However, several studies point to a lack of training and limited adoption by students and teachers, which affects the quality and efficiency of research work. Quantitative and descriptive studies indicate that these tools improve citation accuracy, prevent plagiarism, and strengthen information literacy skills. Comparative studies highlight differences in functionality, ease of use, and platform compatibility, while theoretical reviews emphasize the need to implement institutional policies that promote their systematic use.

Palabras clave : bibliographic managers; research training; university students.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )