SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue3Citizen participation and public value creation in Latin American local governments: A systematic reviewProtective factors for reducing premalignant cervical lesions in women: systematic review for public management author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista InveCom

On-line version ISSN 2739-0063

Abstract

SUAREZ PENA, Hilter et al. Ex ante reading and ex post motivation: The questioned deferred reading of sentences in the Peruvian criminal process. Revista InveCom [online]. 2026, vol.6, n.3, e603102.  Epub Dec 15, 2025. ISSN 2739-0063.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17706156.

This study explores the practice of delayed reading of criminal sentences in the Peruvian judicial system, focusing on emblematic cases where the verdict was announced before its reasoning was made public. Although this practice is contemplated in Article 396.2 of the New Criminal Procedure Code (NCPP), it is criticized for violating the right to immediate judicial justification and, therefore, affecting due process. The objective, aligned with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), was to analyze how delayed reading impacts the procedural and constitutional guarantees of those subject to the law. A qualitative methodology based on literature review and case analysis was employed. The results reveal an epistemic gap and deficiencies in legal representation that weaken judicial transparency and favor the media's influence on the ruling. Furthermore, the discussion highlights a tension between procedural efficiency and constitutional guarantees, jeopardizing the legitimacy of the judicial act. It is concluded that the Peruvian justice system must reform its procedural framework to restore the unity of the jurisdictional act, ensuring that every judgment is pronounced and justified in a single public act, a vital condition for strengthening public trust and the legitimacy of the judicial system. Thus, this research provides a critical perspective on how delayed judgments can affect fundamental rights and offers a basis for promoting procedural reforms that harmonize efficiency with full respect for due process and judicial justification.

Keywords : administration of justice; human rights; procedural guarantees; judicial reasoning; institutional transparency.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )